Civilian-military co-operation strategies in developing new technologies

Research Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 955-970

  Kulve, Haico Te ^a   Smit, Wim A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Civilian military integration; Dual use technology; Socio technical network

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867930533     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00105-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alic et al.; 1992. Beyond Spinoff. Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
2. Altmann, J.; Liebert, W.; Neuneck, G.; Scheffran, J.; 1998. Dual-use and conversion of military related R&D in Germany, In: Reppy, J. (Ed.), Conversion of Military R&D. Macmillan, London.
3. Bertsch, G.K. (Ed.), 1988, Controlling East West Trade and Technology Transfer. Duke University Press, Durham.
4. R Cagliano, V Manzini, and R Chiesa Differences and similarities in managing technological collaborations in research Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17 2000 193 224
5. V Chiesa, R Manzini, and F Tecilla Selecting sourcing strategies for technological innovation: an empirical case study International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20 9 2000 1017 1037
6. R Cowan, and D Foray Quandaries in the economics of dual technologies and spillovers from military to civilian research and development Research Policy 24 1995 851 868
7. B Elzen, B Enserink, and W.A Smit Socio-technical networks: how a technology studies approach may help to solve problems related to technical change Social Studies of Science 26 1 1996 95 141
8. Davies, D.; 1979. Peaceful application of nuclear explosion. In: Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Taylor & Francis Ltd.; London, pp. 293-305.
9. Enserink, B.; 1993. Influencing military technological innovation. Socio-technical networks and the development of the supersonic bomber. Eburon, Delft.
10. Goldblat, J.; 1982. Agreements for Arms Control: A Critical Survey. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Taylor & Francis Ltd.; London.
11. Gummett, P.; (Ed.), 1991. Future Relations Between Defence and Civil Science and Technology, SPSG Review Paper no. 2. A report prepared for the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, prepared by ESCR/SPSG Defence Science and Technology Policy team, London.
12. Gummett, P.; Reppy, J. (Eds.), 1988. The Relations Between Defence and Civil Technologies. In: NATO ASI Series. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
13. Gummett, P.; Stein, J.A.; (Eds.), 1997. European Defence Technology in Transition. Harwood, Amsterdam.
14. Hansen, C.; 1988. US nuclear weapons: the secret history. Aerofax Inc.; Arlington, TX and Orion Books, New York.
15. H Klein Technology push-over: defence downturns and civilian technology policy Research Policy 30 2001 937 951
16. W.J Kolkert The pulse physics research programme of The Netherlands Organisation for applied research TNO IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 25 1 1989 306 308
17. MacKenzie, D.; 1990. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Markusen, A.R.; Costigan, S.S.; 1999. Arming the Future. A Defence Industry for the 21st Century. Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York.
19. Milne, T.; 1998. Conversion of R&D: the UK case. In: Reppy, J. (Ed.), Conversion of Military R&D. Macmillan, London.
20. J Molas-Gallart Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of dual-use technology transfer Research Policy 26 1997 367 385
21. OTA, US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1992a. After the Cold War: living with lower defence spending, OTA-ITE-524. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
22. OTA, US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1992b. Building future security: strategies for restructuring the defence technology and industrial base, OTA-ISG-530. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
23. OTA, US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1993. Defence conversion: redirecting R&D, OTA-ITE-552. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
24. OTA, US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1994. Assessing the potential for civil military integration: technologies, processes and practices, OTA-ISS-611. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
25. OTA, US Congress Office of Technology Assessment, 1995. Assessing the potential for civil-military integration: selected case studies, OTA-BP-ISS-158. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
26. Pinsky, N.; Grosvenor, V.L.; 2000. Bipolar lead-acid battery plates and method of making same. US Patent US6077623.
27. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 1999. A Review of the Technological Reinvestment Project, PIPS-99-1. Arlington, VA.
28. Reppy, J. (Ed.) 1998. Conversion of Military R&D. Macmillan, London.
29. Reppy, J.; 1999. Dual-use technology: back to the future? In: Markusen, A.R.; Costigan, S.S. (Eds.), Arming the Future: A Defence Industry for the 21st Century. Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York, pp. 269-284.
30. Saakes, M.; Schellevis, D.; van Trier, D.; Wollersheim, M.; 1996. Performance and use of composite-substrate-based bipolar lead/acid batteries for pulsed-power publications. In: Proceedings of the Paper Presentation at the 5th European Lead Battery Conference, Barcelona, 30 September-4 October.
31. M Saakes, D Schellevis, D van Trier, and M Wollersheim Performance and use of composite-substrate-based bipolar lead/acid batteries for pulsed power applications Journal of Power Sources 67 1997 33 41
32. M Saakes, E Kluiters, D Schmal, S Mourad, and P.T.J.H ten Have Development and testing of a bipolar lead-acid battery for hybrid electric vehicles Journal of Power Sources 78 1999 199 203
33. Serfati, C.; 1997. France. In: Gummett, P.; Stein, J.A. (Eds.), European Defence Technology in Transition. Harwood, Amsterdam.
34. Smit, W.A.; 1995. Science, technology and the military: relations in transition. In: Jasanoff, S.; Markle, G.E.; Peterson, J.C.; et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage, London, pp. 598-626.
35. Smit, W.A.; Elzen, B.; Enserink, B.; 1998. Coordination in military socio-technical networks: military needs, requirements and guiding principles. In: Disco, C.; van der Meulen, B. (Eds.), Getting New Technologies Together. Studies in Making Socio-technical Order. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 71-105.