Field of dreams: A social history of neuroethics

Advances in Medical Sociology

Volumn 13, Issue , 2011, Pages 299-324

  Conrad, Erin C ^a   De Vries, Raymond ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867925745     PISSN: 10576290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013017     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Abi-Rached, J., & Rose, N. (2010). The birth of the neuromolecular gaze. History of the Human Sciences, 23, 11-36.
3. AAAS. (2011). About AAAS. AAAS. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/ aboutaaas/. Accessed on October 1, 2010.
4. About Us. Greenwall foundation. Retrieved from http://www.greenwall.org/ about.htm. Accessed on October 1, 2010.
5. Advisory board (2003-2008). Nanoethics Group. Available at http://www.nanoethics.org/advisoryboard.html. Accessed on December 23, 2010.
6. Allhoff, F. (2007). On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics. Nanoethics, 1, 185-210.
7. Andre, J. (2002). Bioethics as practice. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
8. Angier, N. (2000). Study finds region of brain may be key problem solver. The New York Times. New York.
9. Basl, J. (2010). State neutrality and the ethics of human enhancement technologies. AJOBNeuroscience, 1, 41-48.
10. Beecher, H. (1966). Consent in clinical experimentation: Myth and reality. Jama, 195, 34-35.
11. Ben-David, J., & Collins, R. (1966). Social factors in the origins of a new science: The case of psychology. American Sociological Review, 31, 451-465.
12. Berg, P. (2004). Asilomar and recombinant DNA. The Nobel Foundation, 26. Retrieved from http://nobelprize.org/nobel-prizes/chemistry/laureates/1980/berg- article.html.
13. Berg, P., & Singer, M. (1995). The recombinant DNA controversy: Twenty years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 9011-9013.
14. Blakeslee, S. (2000). Brain signals shown to move a Robot's arm. The New York Times. New York.
15. Brandt, A. (1978). Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Hastings Center Report, 8, 21-33.
16. Bucher, R., & Strauss, A. (1961). Professions in process. The American Journal of Sociology, 66, 325-334.
17. Bush, G. (1990) Presidential Proclamation 6158. In: J. T. Woolley & G. Peters (Eds.), The American Presidency Project [online]. Santa Barbara, CA. Retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=1869. Accessed on August 4, 2011.
18. Caplan, A. (2002). The brain revolution and ethics. Scientist- Philadelphia, 16, 12-13.
19. Chatterjee, A. (2006). The promise and predicament of cosmetic neurology. Journal of medical ethics, 32, 110-113. (Pubitemid 43230583)
20. Cheshire, W., Jr. (2008). The pharmacologically enhanced physician. Virtual Mentor, 10, 594-598.
21. Dana, C. (1915). Suffrage a cult of self and sex: The average zealot has the mental age of eleven and through a cranny sees the dazzling illusion of a New Heaven. The New York Times. New York.
22. Dana, N. T. (2011). Donor spotlight: A conversation. The Lyford Cay Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.lyfordcayfoundation.org/whatsnew.php?cmd1/ 4view&id1/431&pre1/4y. Accessed on October 23, 2010.
23. Dana Foundation. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.dana.org/Default.aspx. Accessed on October 2, 2010.
24. Davies, J. (2009). Psychotherapy and the third wave of professionalization. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counseling, 11, 192-202.
25. De Vries, R. (2007). Who will guard the guardians of neuroscience? European Molecular Biology Organization Reports, 8, S65-S69.
26. De Vries, R., Dingwall, R., & Orfali, K. (2009). The moral organization of the professions: Bioethics in the United States and France. Current Sociology, 57, 555-579.
27. De Vries, R., & Lemmens, T. (2006). The social and cultural shaping of medical evidence: Case studies from pharmaceutical research and obstetric science. Social science & medicine, 62, 2694-2706. (Pubitemid 44389402)
28. Doucet, H. (2005). Imagining a neuroethics which would go further than genethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 29-31. (Pubitemid 41673991)
29. Dr. Judy Illes. UBC neurology. Retrieved from http://www.ubcneurology. com/Staff%20- Web%20Pages/Staff-Web-Pages-JIlles.html. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
30. Dupuy, J. (2007). Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32, 237-261. (Pubitemid 47026937)
31. Eakin, E. (2000). Looking for that brain wave called love; humanities experts use M.R.I.'s to scan the mind for the locus of the finer feelings. The New York Times. New York.
32. Farah, M. (2005). Neuroethics: The practical and the philosophical. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9, 34-40. (Pubitemid 40091931)
33. Fins, J. (2008). A leg to stand on: Sir William Osler and Wilder Penfield's Neuroethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 8, 37-46. (Pubitemid 351185583)
34. Freund, P. (1965). Ethical problems in human experimentation. New England Journal of Medicine, 273, 687-692.
35. Garland, B. (2003). Neuroscience and the law. Washington, DC: Dana Press.
36. Goldim, J. (2009). Revisiting the beginning of bioethics: The contribution of Fritz Jahr (1927). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52, 377-380.
37. Google News Archive Search. (2009). Google. Available at http://news.google.com/archivesearch. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
38. Google Scholar. (2010). Google. Available at http://scholar.google.com/. Accessed on August 30, 2010 Gordijn, B. (2005). Nanoethics: From utopian dreams and apocalyptic nightmares towards a more balanced view. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 521-533.
39. Greely, H. (2006). Neuroethics and ELSI: Similarities and differences. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 7, 599-637.
40. Greely, H. (2007). On neuroethics. Science, 318, 533. (Pubitemid 350014803)
41. Green, R. (2006). From genome to brainome: Charting the lessons learned. In: J. Illes (Ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42. Hall, Z. (2002). Welcome. In: S. Marcus (Ed.), Neuroethics: Mapping the field. New York, NY: Dana Press.
43. Harris, G. (2010). Diabetes drug maker hid test data, files indicate. The New York Times. New York.
44. History. (2011). Center for Neuroscience & Society. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.neuroethics.upenn.edu/ index.php/about-penn-cns/history. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
45. Home. The Oxford Centre for Neuroethics. Retrieved from http://www.neuroethics.ox.ac.uk/home. Accessed on October 1, 2010.
46. Hotz, R. L. (2000). Women use more of brain when listening, study says; science: They employ both sides, men just one. But who listens better? That remains a gray area. Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles.
47. Human Genome Project Budget. 2004). Human Genome Project Information. Retrieved from http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human-Genome/project/ budget.shtml. Accessed on August 30 2010.
48. Illes, J., & Bird, S. (2006). Neuroethics: A modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends in neurosciences, 29, 511-517. (Pubitemid 44291815)
49. Illes, J., Moser, M., Mccormick, J., Racine, E., Blakeslee, S., Caplan, A., y Mcknight, P. (2009). Neurotalk: Improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 61-69.
50. Illes, J., & Racine, E. (2005). Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 5-18. (Pubitemid 41679293)
51. Illes, J., & Raffin, T. (2002). Neuroethics: An emerging new discipline in the study of brain and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 50, 341-344. (Pubitemid 36042960)
52. Illes Helps Launch Neuroethics Society. 2006). Stanford report. Stanford University. Retrieved from http://news-service.stanford.edu. Accessed on August 30 2010.
53. Ingelfinger, F. (1973). Ethics of experiments on children. New England Journal of Medicine, 288, 791-792.
54. Jahr, F. (1927). Bio-ethik: eine umschau uber die ethischen beziehungen des menschen zu tier und pflanze. Kosmos. Handweiser fur Naturfreunde, 24, 2-4.
55. Jaroff, L. (1989) The gene hunt. Time. pp. 62-67.
56. Jonsen, A. (1998). The birth of bioethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57. Kanwisher, N. (2009). The use of fMRI in lie detection: What has been shown and what has not. In: Using imaging to identify deceit: Scientific and ethical questions. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
58. Keirns, C., Fetters, M.,& De Vries, R. (2009). Bioethics and medical education. In: C. Brosnan& B. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of medical education. London: Routledge.
59. Knoppers, B. (2005). Neuroethics, new ethics? The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 33.
60. Leshner, A. (2005). It's time to go public with neuroethics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 1-2. (Pubitemid 41673983)
61. Levy, N. (2008). Introducing neuroethics. Neuroethics, 1, 1-8.
62. Marks, J. H. (2010). A neuroskeptic's guide to neuroethics and national security. AJOBNeuroscience, 1, 4-12.
63. Martin, J. (2002). The integration of neurology, psychiatry, and neuroscience in the 21st century. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 695-704. (Pubitemid 34465040)
64. Moran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity. London: Routledge.
65. Moreno, J. (2003). Neuroethics: An agenda for neuroscience and society. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 149-153. (Pubitemid 37271384)
66. Neuroethics: Neuroscience for kids (1996-2011). Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/neuroe.html. Accessed on October 2, 2010.
67. Neuroethics Society Nominating Committee Election Survey. Retrieved from http://www. surveymonkey.com/s/5VFLCBN. Accessed on December 23, 2010.
68. Neuroethics: Mapping the Field Conference Reader. (2002) Stanford University. Available at http://bioethics.stanford.edu/conference/conference- reader.html. Accessed on August 30, 2010.
69. Nordmann, A. (2007). If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics, 1, 31-46.
70. Pappworth, M. (1967). Human guinea pigs: Experimentation on man. Boston: Beacon Press.
71. Parens, E., & Johnston, J. (2007). Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics? Three problems with keying ethics to hot new science and technology. EMBO reports, 8, S61-S64. (Pubitemid 47335501)
72. Pontius, A. (1973). Neuro-ethics of 'walking' in the newborn. Perceptual and motor skills, 37, 235-245.
73. Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
74. Robison, W. (2004). Nano-ethics. In: D. N. A. Baird & J. Schummer (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale. Amsterdam.
75. Roskies, A. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron, 35, 21-24.
76. Rothman, D. (1991). Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York, NY: Basic Books.
77. Shapin, S. (1982). History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of Science, 20, 157-211.
78. Shriver, A. (2009). Knocking out pain in livestock: Can technology succeed where morality has stalled? Neuroethics, 2, 115-124.
79. Singh, J., Hallmayer, J., & Illes, J. (2007). Interacting and paradoxical forces in neuroscience and society. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 153-160. (Pubitemid 46146952)
80. Steinfels, P. (1976). Against bioethicists. Hastings Center Report, 6, 18-19.
81. Stevens, M. L. T. (2000). Bioethics in America: Origins and cultural politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
82. Turner, L. (2003). The tyranny of 'genethics'. Nature biotechnology, 21, 1282.
83. Van Den Berg, J. (1969). Medische macht en medische ethiek. Nijkerk: Callenbach.
84. Vedder, A., & Klaming, L. (2010). Human enhancement for the common good-using neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memory. AJOB-Neuroscience, 1, 22-33.
85. Vergano, D. (2000). Brain chip offers blind another chance at 'sight': Computer-driven prototype creates 'tunnel vision' in single test subject. USA Today. McLean, VA.
86. Vernillo, A. (2008). Neuroethics is not hyperbole. The American journal of bioethics: AJOB, 8, 57-59. (Pubitemid 351185590)
87. Wade, N. (2010). A decade later, genetic map yields few new cures. The New York Times. New York.
88. Whitehouse, P. & George, D. (2008). Ethical issues in neurology. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 2737-2738.
89. Wilfond, B., & V. Ravitsky, V. (2005). On the proliferation of bioethics sub-disciplines: Do we really need "Genethics" and "Neuroethics"? The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 20-21. (Pubitemid 41673986)
90. Wolpe, P. (2002). Conference summary: Bioethics and the cognitive neuroscience revolution. Penn Bioethics. Philadelphia.
91. Wolpe, P. (2010). Welcome to the new, independent, AJOB Neuroscience. AJOB Neuroscience, 1, 1-20.
92. Wolpe, P., Foster, K., & Langleben, D. (2005). Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 39-49. (Pubitemid 41673996)