On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics

NanoEthics

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 185-210

  Allhoff, Fritz ^a,b  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Nanoethics; Nanothechnology; Revolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249051818     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-007-0018-3     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Allhoff F (ed) (2008) Physicians at war: The dual-loyalties challenge. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
2. Allhoff F (2005a) Germ-line genetic enhancements and Rawlsian primary goods. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 15.1:39-56
3. Allhoff F (2005b) On economic justifications of bioterrorism defense spending. American Journal of Bioethics 5.4:52-54
4. Allhoff F (2006) Physician involvement in hostile interrogations. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 15:392-402
5. Allhoff F, Lin P (2006) What's so special about nanotechnology and nanoethics? Int J Appl Philos 20.2:179-190
6. Allhoff F, Vaidya AJ (eds) (2008a) Business ethics. Broadview Press, Calgary (in press)
7. Allhoff F, Vaidya AJ (eds) (2008b) Professional ethics. Broadview Press, Calgary (in press)
8. Allhoff F, Lin P, Moore D (2009) Nanotechnology: What it is and why it matters. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA (forthcoming)
9. Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, Weckert J (eds) (2007) Nanoethics: The social and ethical implications of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
10. American Bar Association (2006) Tort law: Asbestos litigation. Retrieved August 13, 2007, from http://www.abanet.org/poladv/priorities/ asbestos.html
11. Baird D, Vogt T (2004) Societal and ethical interactions with nanotechnology ("SEIN"): An introduction. Nanotechnology Law & Business 1.4:391-396
12. Bascomb N (2004) The perfect mile: Three athletes, one goal, and less than four minutes to achieve it. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
13. Bawa R, Johnson S (2008) Emerging issues in nanomedicine and ethics. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanoethics: Emerging debates. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
14. Berube DM (2007) Intuitive toxicology: The public perception of nanoscience. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanoethics: Emerging debates. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
15. Bodansky D (1991) Scientific uncertainty and the precautionary principle. Environment 33.7:4-5; 43-44
16. Bostrom, N. (n.d.) Transhumanist values. Retrieved August 23, 2007, from http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/values.html
17. Brandt E, Otter CL (2005) Preserving the foundation of liberty. Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy 19.1:261-276
18. Buford C, Allhoff F (2005) Neuroscience and metaphysics. American Journal of Bioethics 5.2:34-36
19. Buford C, Allhoff F (2007) Neuroscience and metaphysics (redux). American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB-Neuroscience) 7.1:58-60
20. Cantrell MK (1998-1999) International response to Dolly: Will scientific freedom get sheared? J Law Health 13:69-102
21. Chicken JC, Telford T, Posner T (1998) The philosophy of risk. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA
22. Cross FB (1996) Paradoxical perils of the precautionary principle. Wash Lee Law Rev 53:851-921
23. de Gonzalez AB, Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363.906:345 (January 31)
24. DeCew JW (1997) In pursuit of privacy: Law, ethics, and the rise of technology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
25. Ebbesen M, Jensen TG (2006) Nanomedicine: Techniques, potentials, and ethical implications. J Biomed Biotechnol 2006:1-11
26. Edwards J, Cheney D (2004) Comments during the 2004 (US) vice presidential debate. Retrieved August 22, 2007 from http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2004b.html
27. El-Sayed I, Huang X, El-Sayed MA (2005) Surface plasmon resonance scattering and absorption of anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnostics: Applications in oral cancer. Nano Lett 5.5:829-834
28. El-Sayed I, Huang X, El-Sayed MA (2006) Selective laser photo-thermal therapy of epithelial carcinoma using anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles. Cancer Lett 239.1:129-135
29. Environmental Working Group (2007) The asbestos epidemic in America. Retrieved August 13, 2007 from http://reports.ewg.org/reports/asbestos/ facts/fact1.php
30. European Commission Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2007) Opinion on the ethical aspects of nanomedicine (Opinion no. 21). Retrieved August 3, 2007 from http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/ activities/docs/opinion_21_nano_en.pdf
31. Florida State University (2005) FSU researcher's 'buckypaper" is stronger than steel. FSU News, October. Retrieved August 23, 2007 from http://www.fsu.edu/news/2005/10/20/steel.paper/
32. Freedman MH (1966) Professional responsibility of the criminal defense lawyer: The three hardest questions. Mich Law Rev 27:1469-1484
33. Freeman A, Sutherland K, Libet B (eds) (2000) The volitional brain: toward a neuroscience of free will. Imprint Academic, Exeter
34. Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory. Bus Ethics Q 4.4:409-421 (October)
35. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing, London
36. Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, SM17
37. Grunwald A (2005) Nanotechnology - a new field of ethical inquiry? Sci Eng Ethics 11:187-201
38. Gutierrez E (2004) Privacy implications of nanotechnology. Electronic Privacy Information Center. Retrieved August 15, 2007 from http://www.epic.org/privacy/nano
39. Hansson SO (1996) What is philosophy of risk? Theoria 62:169-186
40. Hansson SO (1999a) A philosophical perspective on risk. Ambio 28:539-542
41. Hansson SO (1999b) Adjusting scientific practices to the precautionary principle. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:909-921
42. Harris DL (2008) Carbon nanotube patent thickets. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanoethics: Emerging debates. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
43. Hughes J (2004) Citizen cyborg: Why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
44. Illes J, Racine EJ (2005) Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by genetics. American Journal of Bioethics 5.2:5-18
45. Institute for Food and Agricultural Standards, Michigan State University (2007) An issues landscape for nanotechnology standards: Report of a workshop. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from http://ifas.msu.edu/ NSWorkshopReport.pdf
46. Intel Museum (2007) The Intel 4004 processor. Retrieved August 17, 2007 from http://www.intel.com/museum/archives/4004facts.htm
47. Jiang Y, Emau P, Cairns JS, Flanary L, Morton WR, McCarthy TD, Tsai C (2005) SPL7013 gel as topical microbicide for prevention of vaginal transmission of SHIV 89.6P in macaques. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 21.3:207-213
48. Johnson RC (2005) Carbon nanotube "paper" stronger than steel. EE Times, November 21. Retrieved August 23, 2007 from http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=173603144
49. Jules A, Syverson P, Bailey D (2005) High-power proxies for enhancing RFID privacy and utility. Retrieved August 3, 2007 from http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/staff/bios/ajuels/publications/pdfs/ RFIDREP2.pdf
50. Kardasiadou Z, Talidou Z (2006) Legal issues of RFID technology. Legal Issues for the Advancement of Information Society Technologies (Legal-IST) Consortium, IST-2-004252-SSA
51. Keal EE (1960) Asbestosis and abdominal neoplasm. Lancet 2:1211-1216
52. Keiper A (2007) Nanoethics as a discipline? The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology and Society 60:55-67 (Spring)
53. Kereiakes JG, Rosenstein M (1980) Handbook of radiation doses in nuclear medicine and diagnostic X-ray. CRC, Boca Raton, FL
54. Khushf G (2004) Systems theory and the ethics of monitoring and surveillance: A framework for NBI convergence. Ann NY Acad Sci 1013:124-149
55. Kurzweil R (2006) The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin, New York
56. Lam C, James JT, McCluskey R, Hunter RL (2004) Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol Sci 77:126-134
57. Lewenstein BV (2005) What counts as a "social and ethical issue" in nanotechnology? HYLE: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 5:5-18
58. Lin P (2007) Nanotechnology bound: Evaluating the case for more regulation. Nanoethics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale 1:105-122
59. Litton P (2007) Nanoethics: What's new? Hastings Cent Rep 37:22-25
60. Locke J (1994) An essay concerning human understanding, 2nd edn. Prometheus Books, New York [1694]
61. Luban D (1983) The adversary excuse. In: Luban D (ed) The good lawyer: lawyers' roles and lawyers' ethics. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ, pp 83-122
62. Martin PH (1997) If you don't know how to fix it, please stop breaking it. Found Sci 2:263-292
63. May T (2005) Funding agendas: Has bioterror defense been over-prioritized? American Journal of Bioethics 5.4:34-44
64. Mesothelioma Resource Center (2007) History of asbestos. Retrieved August 13, 2007, from http://www.mesothelioma-center.com/information/ asbestos/history-of-asbestos.html
65. Miller S, Weckert J (2000) Privacy, the workplace, and the Internet. J Bus Ethics 28:255-265
66. Moore GE (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, 38.8, 56-59. Retrieved August 17, 2007 from http://www.intel.com/technology/mooreslaw/
67. Myhr A, Dalmo R (2007) Nanotechnology and risk: What are the issues? In: Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, Weckert J (eds) Nanoethics: The social and ethical implications of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 149-159
68. National Cancer Institute (2005a) Gold nanoparticles show potential for noninvasive cancer treatment. Nanotech News, October 17. Retrived August 7, 2007 from http://nano.cancer.gov/news_center/ nanotech_news_2005-10-17b.asp
69. National Cancer Institute (2005b) Targeted gold nanoparticles detect oral cancer cells. Nanotech News, April 25. Retrieved August 7, 2007 from http://nano.cancer.gov/news_center/nanotech_news_2005-04-25b.asp
70. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2007) Retrieved July 16, 2007 from http://www.nano.gov/html/facts/whatIsNano.html
71. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2007) Research and development funding in the president's 2006 budget. Retrieved August 3, 2007 from http://64.225.252.6/html/budget/2006/One-Pagers/ FY06NationalNanotechnologyInitiative1-pager.pdf
72. National Research Council (1990) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
73. National Science and Technology Council's Committee on Technology (2000) National Nanotechnology Initiative: Leading to the Next Industrial Revolution. February
74. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books, New York
75. O'Riordon T, Cameron J (eds) (1994) Interpreting the precautionary principle. Earthscan Publications, London
76. Obataya I, Nakamura C, Han S, Nakamura N, Miyake J (2005) Nanoscale operation of a living cell using an atomic force microscope with a nanoneedle. Nano Lett 5.1:27-30
77. 60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environ Health Perspect 112.10:1058-1062
78. Office of the US President (2007) Office management and budget. Retrieved August 3, 2007, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/ fy2007/defense.html
79. Olson E (1997) The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
80. Parfit D (1984) Reasons and persons. Clarendon, Oxford
81. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC (1993) The virtues in medical practice. Oxford University Press, New York
82. Pellegrino ED (1985) The virtuous physician, and the ethics of medicine. In: Shelp (ed) Virtue and Eedicine: explorations in the character of medicine. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 237-255
83. Perrine JB (2005) The USA patriot act: Big brother or business as usual? Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy 19.1:163-195
84. Philipkowski K (1999) Another change for gene therapy. Wired, October 1. Retrieved August 16, 2007 from http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/ news/1999/10/31613
85. Phoenix C, Treder M (2004) Applying the precautionary principle to nanotechnology. Retrieved August 14, 2007 from http://www.crnano.org/ precautionary.htm
86. Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice, rev. edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
87. Rescher N (1983) Risk: A philosophical introduction to the theory of risk evaluation and management. University Press of America, Lanham, MD
88. Roessler B (2005) The value of privacy. Polity Press, Oxford
89. Robert JS (2007) Nanoscience, nanoscientists, and controversy. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanoethics: Emerging debates. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
90. Roco MC (n.d.) Nanotechnology funding: An international outlook. Retrieved August 3, 2007 from http://www.nano.gov/html/res/ IntlFundingRoco.htm
91. Royal Society of Chemistry (2006) Washing machine triggers nanoparticle regulation. Chemistry News, November 24. Retrieved July 27, 2007 from http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2006/November/24110602.asp
92. Sagoff M (1981) At the shrine of our Lady of Fatima; or, why political questions are not all economic. Ariz Law Rev 23:1283-1298
93. Sethe S (2007) Nanotechnology and life extension. In: Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, Weckert J (eds) Nanoethics: The social and ethical implications of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 353-365
94. Schoeman DF (ed) (1984) Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
95. Schmid G et al. (2006) Nanotechnology: Assessments and perspectives. Springer, Berlin
96. Schummer J (2008) Cultural diversity in nanotechnology. In: Allhoff F, Lin P (eds) Nanoethics: Emerging debates. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
97. Schummer J (2007a) Identifying ethical issues in nanotechnology. In: Ten Have H (ed) Science ethics and policy issues. UNESCO Publishing, Paris, pp 79-98
98. Schummer J (2007b) The impact of nanotechnologies on developing countries. In: Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, WeckertTJ (eds) Nanoethics: the social and ethical implications of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 291-307
99. Shew A (2007) Nanotechnology's future: Considerations for the professional. In: Allhoff F, Ein P (eds) Nanoethics: emerging debates. Springer, Dordrecht (in press)
100. Shiveley R (2006) Dual-core Intel Itanium 2 processors deliver unbeatable flexibility and performance to the enterprise. Technology@Intel Magazine, August. Retrieved August 17, 2007 from http://www.intel.com/technology/magazine/computing/ dual-core-itanium-0806.pdf
101. Shrader-Frechette K (1998) A defense of risk-cost-benefit analysis. In: Pojman LP (ed) Environmental ethics: Readings in theory and application, 3rd edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp 507-514
102. Silver Institute (2003) Samsung washing machine disinfects with silver - no hot water needed. Retrieved July 16, 2007 from http://www.silverinstitute.org/news/2b03.html
103. Sunstein CR (2005) Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Ethics 115:351-385 (January)
104. Swartz JS (2002) The human cloning act of 2001: Vagueness and federalism. Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology 43:79-90
105. Thompson PB (1986) The philosophical foundations of risk. South J Philos 24:273-286
106. Tirlapur UK, König K (2003) Femptosecond near-infrared laser pulses as a versatile non-invasive tool for intra-tissue nanoprocessing in plants without compromising viability. Plant J 31.2:365-374
107. Toth-Fejel T, Dodsworth C (2007) Nanoethics and the high frontier. In: Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, Weckert J (eds) Nanoethics: The social and ethical implications of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 323-337
108. UN Ad Hoc Committee (2007) Retrieved August 23, 2007 from http://www.un.org/law/cloning/
109. UNAIDS (2006) Report on the global AIDS epidemic. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://www.unaids.org/en/HIV_data/2006GlobalReport/ default.asp
110. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2001) ToxFAQs for asbestos. Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, September. Retrieved August 13, 2007 from http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts61.html
111. US Patent Act-35 USCS Sects. 1-376 (2007) Retrieved July 27, 2007 from http://www.law.cornell.edu/patent/patent.overview.html
112. van den Hoven J (2006) Nanotechnology and privacy: The instructive case of RFID. Int J Appl Philos 20:215-228
113. Weckert J (2005) On-line trust. In: Cavalier R (ed) The impact of the Internet on our moral lives. SUNY Press, Albany, NY, pp 95-117
114. Weckert J (2002) Trust, corruption, and surveillance in the electronic workplace. In: Brunnstein K, Berleur J (eds) Human choice and computers: issues of choice and quality of life in the information society. Kluwer, Boston, pp 109-120
115. Weckert J, Moor J (2007) The precautionary principle in nanotechnology. In: Allhoff F, Lin P, Moor J, Weckert J (eds) NaToethics: the social and ethical implications of nanotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ pp 133-46. Originally published under the same title in (2006). Int J Appl Philos 2.2:191-402
116. Weldon C (2005) Liberty's duty to defend itself. Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy 19.1:277-288
117. Wikipedia (2007) World record progression for the mile run. Retrieved August 20, 2007 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ World_record_progression_for_the_mile_run
118. World Health Organization (2004) Water, sanitation, and hygiene links to health: Facts and figures. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://www.who.int/entity/water_sanitation_health/factsfigures2005.pdf
119. World Transhumanist Association (2002) The transhumanist declaration. Retrieved August 20, 2007 from http://www.transhumanism.org/index.php/ WTA/declaration/
120. 60) in two aquatic species, daphnia and fathead minnow. Mar Environ Res 62(Suppl 1):S5-S9