Effect of contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs)

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 5527-5535

  Abdullah, Siti N ^a,b,c   Aldahlawi, Nada ^a,d   Rosli, Yanti ^e   Vaegan, ^a   Boon, Mei Ying ^a   Maddess, Ted ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b RIPAS HOSPITAL   (Brunei Darussalam)

^c Australian National University   (Australia)

^d KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^e UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STEADY STATE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; VISION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; ELECTRODES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867909542     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-9325     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baseler HA, Sutter EE. M and P components of the VEP and their VF contribution. Vis Res. 1997;37:675-690.
2. Abdullah SN, Vaegan, Boon MY, Maddess T. Contrast-response functions of the multifocal steady-state VEP (MSV) [published online ahead of print March 21, 2012]. Clin Neurophysiol. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.02.067.
3. Rosli Y, Maddess T, Dawel A, James AC. Multifocal frequencydoubling pattern visual evoked responses to dichoptic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:2100-2108.
4. Maddess T, James AC, Goldberg I, Wine S, Dobinson J. Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency doubling thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3827-3832.
5. Maddess T, James AC, Goldberg I, Wine S, Dobinson J. A spatial frequency doubling illusion-based pattern electroretinogram for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3818-3826.
6. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Amer. 1966;56:1628-1632.
7. Jeffreys D. Cortical source locations of pattern-related visual evoked potentials recorded from the human scalp. Nature. 1971;229:502-504.
8. Di Russo F, Martinez A, Sereno MI, Pitzalis S, Hillyard SA. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001;15:95-111.
9. Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Spitoni G, et al. Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP. Neuroimage. 2005; 24:874-886.
10. James A. The pattern pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:879-890.
11. Carney T, Ales J, Klein SA. Combining MRI and VEP imaging to isolate the temporal response of visual cortical areas. SPIE. 2008;6806:680808-1-680808-28.
12. Daniel PM, Whitteridge D. The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J Physiol. 1961;159: 203-221.
13. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962;160:106-154.
14. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1966;29:1115-1156.
15. Wassle H, Grunert U, Rohrenbeck J, Boycott BB. Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion-cell density of the primate retina. Nature. 1989;341:643-646.
16. Tootell RB, Switkes E, Silverman MS, Hamilton SL. Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. II. Retinotopic organization. J Neurosci. 1988;8:1531-1568.
17. Azzopardi P, Cowey A. The overrepresentation of the fovea and adjacent retina in the striate cortex and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque monkey. Neuroscience. 1996;72:627-639.
18. Schwartz EL. Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: a spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding. Vision Res. 1980;20:645-669.
19. Adams DL, Horton JC. A precise retinoscopic map of primate striate cortex generated from the representation of angioscotomas. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3771-3789.
20. Zemon V, Ratliff F. Visual evoked potentials: evidence for lateral interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79:5723-5726.
21. Maddess T, Hemmi JM, James AC. Evidence for spatial aliasing effects in the Y-like cells of the magnocellular visual pathway. Vision Res. 1998;38:1843-1859.
22. Rosli Y, Maddess T, Bedford SM. Low spatial frequency channels and the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:1956-1963.
23. Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, Chen CS. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol. 2002;104:303-320.
24. Klistorner A, Graham SL. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2283-2299.
25. Hoffmann MB, Bach M. The distinction between eye and object motion is reflected by the motion-onset visual evoked potential. Exp Brain Res. 2002;144:141-151.
26. Maddess T, James AC, Bowman EA. Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22:153-162.
27. Baseler HA, Sutter EE. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field contribution. Vis Res. 1997;37:675-690.
28. Klistorner A, Crewther DP, Crewther SG. Separate magnocellular and parvocellular contributions from temporal analysis of the multifocal VEP. Vision Res. 1997;37:2161-2169.
29. Bagolini B, Porciatti V, Falsini B. Binocular interaction and steady-state visual evoked potentials. I. A study in normal subjects and in subjects with defective binocular vision. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:401.
30. Kaplan E. The M, P, and K pathways of the primate visual system. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS, ed. The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004:481-493.
31. Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42: 2145-2152.
32. Mitchell KW, Howe JW, Spencer SR. Visual evoked-potentials in the older population-age and gender effects. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1987;8:317-324.
33. Hood DC, Ghadiali Q, Zhang JC, Graham NV, Wolfson SS, Zhang X. Contrast-response functions for multifocal visual evoked potentials: a test of a model relating V1 activity to multifocal visual evoked potentials activity. J Vis. 2006;6:580-593.
34. Vaegan, Rahman AMA, Sanderson GF. Glaucoma affects steady state VEP contrast thresholds before psychophysics. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:547-558.
35. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:371-383.
36. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH, Lee BB. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2002;43:3590-3599.
37. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Mechanism isolated by frequencydoubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:398-401.
38. Morgan JE. Selective cell death in glaucoma: does it really occur? Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:875-879. discussion 879-880.
39. Dacey DM. Morphology of a small-field bistratified ganglion cell type in the macaque and human retina. Vis Neurosci. 1993;10:1081-1098.
40. Crook JD, Peterson BB, Packer OS, et al. The smooth monostratified ganglion cell: evidence for spatial diversity in the Y-cell pathway to the lateral geniculate nucleus and superior colliculus in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 2008; 28:12654-12671.
41. Petrusca D, Grivich MI, Sher A, et al. Identification and characterization of a Y-like primate retinal ganglion cell type. J Neurosci. 2007;27:11019-11027.