The Hogeye Clovis cache, Texas: Quantifying lithic reduction signatures

Journal of Archaeological Science

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 649-658

  Jennings, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biface production; Cache caching; Clovis; Lithic technology; Paleoindian

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; ARTIFACT; HOLOCENE; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; TECHNOLOGY;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84867905839     PISSN: 03054403     EISSN: 10959238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson D.G. Models of Paleoindian and Early Archaic settlement in the lower Southeast. The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast 1996, 29-57. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. D.G. Anderson, K. Sassaman (Eds.).
2. Bamforth D.B. Rethinking the role of bifacial technology in Paleoindian adaptations on the Great Plains. Multiple Approaches to the Study of Bifacial Technologies 2003, 209-228. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. M. Soressi, H.L. Dibble (Eds.).
3. Beck C., Jones G.T. Clovis and western stemmed: population migration and the meeting of two technologies in the intermountain west. American Antiquity 2010, 75:81-116.
4. Bever M.R., Meltzer D.J. Exploring variation in Paleoindian life ways: the third revised edition of the Texas Clovis fluted point survey. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 2007, 78:65-99.
5. Bradley B.A. Flaked stone technology and typology. The Agate Basin Site 1982, 181-208. Academic Press, New York. G.C. Frison, D.J. Stanford (Eds.).
6. Bradley B.A. Paleo-Indian flaked stone technology in the North American high plains. From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic-Paleo-Indian Adaptations 1993, 251-262. Plenum Press, New York. O. Soffer, N.D. Praslov (Eds.).
7. Bradley B.A., Collins M.B., Hemmings A. Clovis Technology. International Monographs in Prehistory 2010, Archaeological Series 17, Ann Arbor.
8. Buchanan B., Collard M. Investigating the people of North America through cladistic analyses of Early Paleoindian projectile points. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2007, 26:366-393.
9. Buchanan B., Kilby J.D., Huckell B.B., O'Brien M.J., Collard M. A morphometric assessment of the intended function of cached Clovis points. PLos One 2012, 7-2:1-13.
10. Callahan E. The basis of biface knapping in the Eastern fluted point tradition: a manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America 1979, 7:1-180.
11. Cannon M.D., Meltzer D.J. Explaining variability in early Paleoindian foraging. Quaternary International 2008, 191:5-17.
12. Collins M.B., Hemmings A.C. Lesser-known Clovis diagnostic artifacts I: the bifaces. La Tierra 2005, 32:9-20.
13. Collins M.B., Lohse J., Shoberg M. The deGraffenreid collection: a Clovis biface cache from the Gault site, central Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 2007, 78:101-123.
14. Dunnell R.C. Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity 1978, 43:192-202.
15. Ellis C. Understanding "Clovis" fluted point variability in the Northeast: a perspective from the Debert site, Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 2004, 28:205-253.
16. Ellis C. Measuring Paleoindian range mobility and land-use in the Great Lakes/Northeast. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2011, 30:385-401.
17. Eren M.I., Vanderlaan S., Holland J.D. Overshot flaking at the Arc Site, Genesee County, New York: examining the Clovis-Gainey connection. The Open Anthropology Journal 2011, 4:40-52.
18. Gingerich J.A.M. Down to seeds and stones: a new look at the subsistence remains from Shawnee-Minisink. American Antiquity 2011, 76:127-144.
19. Haynes C.V. Contributions of radiocarbon dating to the geochronology of the peopling of the new world. Radiocarbon After Four Decades 1992, 355-374. Springer-Verlag, New York. R.E. Taylor, A. Long, S. Kra (Eds.).
20. Haynes G. The Early Settlement of North America: the Clovis Era 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Hester J.J. Blackwater Locality No. 1: a Stratified, Early Man Site in Eastern New Mexico 1972, Fort Burgwin Research Center, Southern Methodist University, Rancho de Taos, New Mexico.
22. Howard E.B. Association of artifacts with mammoth and bison in eastern New Mexico. Science 1933, 78:524.
23. Huckell B.B. Clovis lithic technology: a view from the upper San Pedro Valley. Anthropological Papers No. 71 2007, 170-210. University of Arizona, Tucson. C.V. Haynes, B.B. Huckell (Eds.).
24. Huckell B.B., Kilby J.D., Boulanger M.T., Glascock M.D. Sentinel Butte: neutron activation analysis of White River Group Chert from a primary source and artifacts from a Clovis cache in North Dakota, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science 2011, 38:965-976.
25. Kelly R.L., Todd L.C. Coming into the country: early Paleoindian hunting and mobility. American Antiquity 1988, 53:231-244.
26. Kilby, J.D., 2008. An Investigation of Clovis Caches: Content, Function, and Technological Organization. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
27. Meltzer D.J. Late Pleistocene human adaptations in eastern North America. Journal of World Prehistory 1988, 2:1-52.
28. Meltzer D.J. First Peoples in a New World 2009, University of California Press, Berkeley.
29. Morrow J.E. Clovis projectile point manufacture: a perspective from the Ready/Lincoln hills site, 11JY46, Jersey County, Illinois. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 1995, 20:167-191.
30. Morrow J., Morrow T. Geographic variation in fluted projectile points: a hemispheric perspective. American Antiquity 1999, 62:215-231.
31. Morrow J.E., Morrow T.A. Exploring the Clovis-Gainey-Folsom continuum: technological and morphological variation in Midwestern fluted points. Lithic Technology Special Publication No. 4 1999, 141-157. J. Clark, M. Collins (Eds.).
32. Sackett J.R. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1982, 1:59-112.
33. Sellards E.H. Early Man in America 1952, University of Texas Press, Austin.
34. Smallwood A.M. Biface technology at the Topper site, South Carolina: evidence for variation and technological flexibility. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010, 37:2413-2425.
35. Smallwood, A.M. Clovis technology and settlement in the American Southeast: using biface analysis to evaluate dispersal models. American Antiquity, in press.
36. Smith, H.L., 2010. A Behavioral Analysis of Clovis Point Morphology Using Geometric Morphometrics. Unpublished thesis, Texas A&M University.
37. Surovell T.A., Waguespack N.M. How many elephant kills are 14? Clovis mammoth and mastodon kills in context. Quaternary International 2008, 191:82-97.
38. Waters M.R., Stafford T.W. Redefining the age of Clovis: implications for the peopling of the Americas. Science 2007, 315:1122-1126.
39. Waters M.R., Pevny C.D., Carlson D.L., Dickens W.A., Smallwood A.M., Minchak S.A., Bartelink E., Wiersema J.M., Wiederhold J.E., Luchsinger H.M., Alexander D.A., Jennings T.A. A Clovis Workshop in Central Texas: Archaeological Investigations of Excavation Area 8 at the Gault Site 2011, Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
40. Wiessner P. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 1983, 49:253-276.
41. Wormington H.M. Ancient Man in North America. Popular Series 4 1957, Peerless, Denver.