Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Evolution and review

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 383-386

  Schumer, Erin ^a,b   Perry, Kyle ^a   Melvin, William Scott ^a,c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^c Department of Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

esophageal cancer; esophagectomy; laparoscopic esophagectomy; minimally invasive esophagectomy

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; BLEEDING; CANCER SURVIVAL; DYSPHAGIA; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LENGTH OF STAY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SATIETY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY;

EID: 84867882440     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826295a4     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Schucert MJ, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ. Management of esophageal cancer. Curr Probl Surg. 2010;47:845-946.
2. Rindani R, Martin CJ, Cox MR. Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference? Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:187-194.
3. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5:1-5.
4. Luketich JD, Nguyen NT, Weigel T, et al. Minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy. JSLS. 1998;2:243-247.
5. Watson DI, Davies N, Jamieson GG. Totally endoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:293-297.
6. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1790-1792.
7. Berger AC, Bloomenthal A, Weksler B, et al. Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:560-566.
8. Singh RK, Pham TH, Diggs BS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2011;146:711-714.
9. Gao YS, Wang Y, Chen LQ, et al. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:366-369.
10. Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg. 2010;252:292-298.
11. Pham TH, Perry KA, Dolan JP, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparo-scopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2010;199:594-598.
12. Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, et al. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1845-1853.
13. Willer BL, Mittal SK, Worrell SG, et al. Applicability and feasibility of incorporating minimally invasive esophagectomy at a high volume center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1201-1206.
14. Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1868-1875.
15. Perry KA, Enestvedt CK, Diggs BS, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably to those of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2147-2154.
16. Perry KA, Enestvedt CK, Pham T, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma. Arch Surg. 2009;144:679-684.
17. Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044-3053.
18. Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esoph-ageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:911-919.
19. Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital's first year experience. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:220-225.
20. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, et al. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagec-tomy. Ann Surg. 2007;245:232-240.
21. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920-925.
22. Donington JS. Functional conduit disorders after esophagec-tomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006;16:53-62.
23. Headrick JR, Nichols FC, Miller DL, et al. High-grade esophageal dysplasia: long-term survival and quality of life after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1697-1702.
24. Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, et al. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1781-1787.
25. Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, et al. The "best operation" for esophageal cancer? Ann Thor Surg. 2010;89:S2163-S2167.
26. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Auenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486-494; discussion 494-495.
27. Thomson IG, Amithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence. Annals of Surgery. 2010;252:281-291.
28. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1081-1091.