메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 65, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1296-1299

Survey finds that most meta-analysts do not attempt to collect individual patient data

Author keywords

Effect modification; Individual patient data; Meta analysis; Meta regression; Randomized controlled trial; Subgroup analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; E-MAIL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

EID: 84867852307     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.010     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (10)

References (20)
  • 1
    • 36348939350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistics in medicine - Reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials
    • R. Wang, S.W. Lagakos, J.H. Ware, D.J. Hunter, and J.M. Drazen Statistics in medicine - reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials N Engl J Med 357 2007 2189 2194
    • (2007) N Engl J Med , vol.357 , pp. 2189-2194
    • Wang, R.1    Lagakos, S.W.2    Ware, J.H.3    Hunter, D.J.4    Drazen, J.M.5
  • 2
    • 11844302840 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Subgroup analysis in randomized controlled trials: Importance, indications, and interpretation
    • P.M. Rothwell Subgroup analysis in randomized controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation Lancet 365 2005 176 186
    • (2005) Lancet , vol.365 , pp. 176-186
    • Rothwell, P.M.1
  • 3
    • 79960838960 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners
    • D.J. Fisher, A.J. Copas, J.F. Tierney, and M.K. Parmar A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 949 976
    • (2011) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.64 , pp. 949-976
    • Fisher, D.J.1    Copas, A.J.2    Tierney, J.F.3    Parmar, M.K.4
  • 4
    • 34250620135 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data
    • M.C. Simmonds, and J.P.T. Higgins Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data Stat Med 26 2007 2982 2999
    • (2007) Stat Med , vol.26 , pp. 2982-2999
    • Simmonds, M.C.1    Higgins, J.P.T.2
  • 5
    • 0037083255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: Ecological bias rears its ugly head
    • J.A. Berlin, J. Santanna, C.H. Schmid, L.A. Szczech, and H.I. Feldman Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head Stat Med 21 2002 371 387
    • (2002) Stat Med , vol.21 , pp. 371-387
    • Berlin, J.A.1    Santanna, J.2    Schmid, C.H.3    Szczech, L.A.4    Feldman, H.I.5
  • 6
    • 0036139582 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis
    • P.C. Lambert, A.J. Sutton, K.R. Abrams, and D.R. Jones A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis J Clin Epidemiol 55 2002 86 94
    • (2002) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.55 , pp. 86-94
    • Lambert, P.C.1    Sutton, A.J.2    Abrams, K.R.3    Jones, D.R.4
  • 7
    • 75749150931 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Individual patient meta-analysis - Rewards and challenges
    • C. van Walraven Individual patient meta-analysis - rewards and challenges J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 235 237
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 235-237
    • Van Walraven, C.1
  • 8
    • 33745699139 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials
    • A.J. Vickers Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials Trials 7 2006 15
    • (2006) Trials , vol.7 , pp. 15
    • Vickers, A.J.1
  • 9
    • 21444454737 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data
    • G.H. Lyman, and N.M. Kuderer The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data BMC Med Res Methodol 5 2005 14
    • (2005) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.5 , pp. 14
    • Lyman, G.H.1    Kuderer, N.M.2
  • 10
    • 0036167948 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data
    • L.A. Stewart, and J.F. Tierney To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data Eval Health Prof 25 2002 76 97
    • (2002) Eval Health Prof , vol.25 , pp. 76-97
    • Stewart, L.A.1    Tierney, J.F.2
  • 14
  • 15
    • 34047170379 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence synthesis combining individual patient data and aggregate data: A systematic review identified current practice and possible methods
    • R.D. Riley, M.C. Simmonds, and M.P. Look Evidence synthesis combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a systematic review identified current practice and possible methods J Clin Epidemiol 60 2007 431 439
    • (2007) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.60 , pp. 431-439
    • Riley, R.D.1    Simmonds, M.C.2    Look, M.P.3
  • 16
    • 77749306261 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meta-analysis of individual participant data: Rationale, conduct, and reporting
    • R.D. Riley, and P.C. Lambert Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting BMJ 340 2010 c221
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340 , pp. 221
    • Riley, R.D.1    Lambert, P.C.2
  • 17
    • 4444333174 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level factors
    • C.H. Schmid, P.C. Stark, J.A. Berlin, P. Landais, and J. Lau Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level factors J Clin Epidemiol 57 2004 683 697
    • (2004) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.57 , pp. 683-697
    • Schmid, C.H.1    Stark, P.C.2    Berlin, J.A.3    Landais, P.4    Lau, J.5
  • 18
    • 70349464471 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PloS journals
    • C.J. Savage, and A.J. Vickers Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PloS journals PloS One 4 9 2009 e7078
    • (2009) PloS One , vol.4 , Issue.9 , pp. 7078
    • Savage, C.J.1    Vickers, A.J.2
  • 19
    • 0027478423 scopus 로고
    • Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: Is there a difference?
    • L.A. Stewart, and M.K. Parmar Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? Lancet 341 1993 418 422
    • (1993) Lancet , vol.341 , pp. 418-422
    • Stewart, L.A.1    Parmar, M.K.2
  • 20
    • 0031196782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Meta-analyses using individual patient data
    • M.J. Clarke, and L.A. Stewart Meta-analyses using individual patient data J Eval Clin Pract 3 1997 207 212
    • (1997) J Eval Clin Pract , vol.3 , pp. 207-212
    • Clarke, M.J.1    Stewart, L.A.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.