Measuring future vehicle preferences

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2285, 2012, Pages 100-109

  Maness, Michael ^a   Cirillo, Cinzia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; SURVEYS; TAXATION;

CHANGING MARKETPLACES; ENERGY MARKETS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PERSONAL VEHICLES; PURCHASING BEHAVIORS; PURCHASING DECISIONS; STATED PREFERENCE SURVEYS; STATED PREFERENCES; SURVEY DESIGN; VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY;

VEHICLES;

EID: 84867835693     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2285-12     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bunch, D., M. Bradley, T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and G. Occhiuzzo. Demand for Clean-fuel Vehicles in California: A Discrete Choice Stated Preference Pilot Project. Transportation Research, Vol. 27A, 1993, pp. 237-253.
2. Kurani, K. S., T. Turrentine, and D. Sperling. Testing Electric Vehicle Demand in "Hybrid Households" Using a Reflexive Survey. Transportation Research, Vol. 1D, 1996, pp. 131-150.
3. Ewing, G., and E. Sarigöllü. Assessing Consumer Preferences for Clean-Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2000, pp. 106-118.
4. Bolduc, D., N. Boucher, and R. Alvarez-Daziano. Hybrid Choice Modeling of New Technologies for Car Choice in Canada. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2082, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2008, pp. 63-71.
5. Mau, P., J. Eyzaguirre, M. Jaccard, C. Collins-Dodd, and K. Tiedemann. The 'Neighbor Effect': Simulating Dynamics in Consumer Preferences for New Vehicle Technologies. Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 1-2, 2008, pp. 504-516.
6. Gaker, D., Y. Zheng, and J. Walker. Experimental Economics in Transportation: Focus on Social Influences and Provision of Information. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2156, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2010, pp. 47-55.
7. Eggers, F., and F. Eggers. Where Have All the Flowers Gone? Forecasting Green Trends in the Automobile Industry with a Choice-based Conjoint Adoption Model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2011, pp. 51-62.
8. Beck, M., J. M. Rose, and D. A. Hensher. Identifying Response Bias in Stated Preference Surveys: Attitudinal Influences in Emissions Charging and Vehicle Selection. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2011.
9. Beck, M. J., J. M. Rose, and D. A. Hensher. Behavioural Responses to Vehicle Emissions Charging. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2011, pp. 445-463.
10. Ahn, J., G. Jeong, and Y. Kim. A Forecast of Household Ownership and Use of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Choice Approach. Energy Economics, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2008, pp. 2091-2104.
11. Axsen, J., D. C. Mountain, and M. Jaccard. Combining Stated and Revealed Choice Research to Simulate the Neighbor Effect: The Case of Hybrid-electric Vehicles. Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2009, pp. 221-238.
12. Musti, S., and K. Kockelman. Evolution of the Household Vehicle Fleet: Anticipating Fleet Composition, PHEV Adoption and GHG Emissions in Austin, Texas. Transportation Research, Vol. 45A, No. 8, 2011, pp. 707-720.
13. Hess, S., M. Fowler, T. Adler, and A. Bahreinian. The Use of Cross-nested Logit Models for Multi-dimensional Choice Processes: The Case of the Demand for Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Transportation, to be published.
14. Axsen, J., and K. S. Kurani. Early U. S. Market for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Anticipating Consumer Recharge Potential and Design Priorities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2139, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2009, pp. 64-72.
15. Brownstone, D., and K. Train. Forecasting New Product Penetration with Flexible Substitution Patterns. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 89, No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 109-129.
16. Brownstone, D., D. S. Bunch, and K. Train. Joint Mixed Logit Models of Stated and Revealed Preferences for Alternative-fuel Vehicles. Transportation Research, Vol. 34B, No. 5, 2000, pp. 315-338.
17. Bierlaire, M. BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models. Proc., Third Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2003.
18. Walker, J. Mixed Logit (or Logit Kernel) Model: Dispelling Misconceptions of Identification. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2002, pp. 86-98.