Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion: A systematic review

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 22, 2012, Pages

  Lawrence, Brandon D ^a   Wang, Jeff ^b   Arnold, Paul M ^c   Hermsmeyer, Jeff ^d   Norvell, Daniel C ^d   Brodke, Darrel S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Spectrum Research Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

adjacent segment degeneration; adjacent segment disease; adjacent segment pathology; degenerative disc disease; interbody fusion; lumbar spondylosis; posterior fusion

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTHRODESIS; CLINICAL ADJACENT SEGMENT PATHOLOGY; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONSENSUS; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR SPINE; MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

AGED; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; RISK; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867743881     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d60d8     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott's disease: A preliminary report 1911. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 460: 14-6.
2. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: The consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 2004; 4 (suppl) : 190S-4S. (Pubitemid 39497304)
3. Aiki H, Ohwada O, Kobayashi H, et al. Adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion requiring second operation. J Orthop Sci 2005; 10: 490-5. (Pubitemid 41414157)
4. Bae JS, Lee SH, Kim JS, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fi xation for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: Minimum 3 years of follow-up. Neurosurgery 2010; 67: 1600-7; discussion 1607-8.
5. Brantigan JW, Neidre A, Toohey JS. The lumbar I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the variable screw placement system: 10-year results of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Spine J 2004; 4: 681-8. (Pubitemid 39497289)
6. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: A minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2007; 32: 2253-7. (Pubitemid 47415109)
7. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine 2007; 32: 2232-7.
8. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 650-6.
9. Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 39-43.
10. Disch AC, Schmoelz W, Matziolis G, et al. Higher risk of adjacent segment degeneration after fl oating fusions: Long-term outcome after low lumbar spine fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 79-85. (Pubitemid 351507594)
11. Djurasovic MO, Carreon LY, Glassman SD, et al. Sagittal alignment as a risk factor for adjacent level degeneration: A case-control study. Orthopedics 2008; 31: 546.
12. Ha KY, Lee JS, Kim KW. Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: A prospective cohort study over fi ve-year follow-up. Spine 2008; 33: 1192-8.
13. Hayashi T, Arizono T, Fujimoto T, et al. Degenerative change in the adjacent segments to the fusion site after posterolateral lumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation -a minimum 4-year follow-up. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 2008; 99: 107-13.
14. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 314-9. (Pubitemid 32762776)
15. Lee DY, Jung TG, Lee SH. Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9: 137-44.
16. Liao JC, Chen WJ, Chen LH, Niu CC, Keorochana G, et al. Surgical outcomes of degenerative spondylolisthesis with L5-S1 disc degeneration: Comparison between lumbar fl oating fusion and lumbosacral fusion at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2011; 36: 1600-7.
17. Lund T, Oxland TR. Adjacent level disk disease -is it really a fusion disease? Orthop Clin North Am 2011; 42: 529-41.
18. Min JH, Jang JS, Jung B, et al. The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 305-9.
19. Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine 2004; 29: 1535-40. (Pubitemid 38943837)
20. Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A, et al. Lamina horizontalization and facet tropism as the risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine 2008; 33: 2754-8.
21. Park JY, Cho YE, Kuh SU, et al. New prognostic factors for adjacent-segment degeneration after one-stage 360 degrees fi xation for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: Special reference to the usefulness of pelvic incidence angle. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7: 139-44.
22. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: Review of the literature. Spine 2004; 29: 1938-44. (Pubitemid 39181056)
23. Pellise F, Hernandez A, Vidal X, et al. Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine 2007; 32: 574-9. (Pubitemid 46398925)
24. Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: A retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 1996; 9: 392-400. (Pubitemid 26423733)
25. Schoenfeld AJ. Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion: Risk factors and implications for clinical practice. Spine J 2011; 11: 21-3.
26. Schulte TL, Leistra F, Bullmann V, et al. Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 2152-8. (Pubitemid 350276100)
27. Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 2008; 33: 503-7. (Pubitemid 351644453)
28. Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Skelly AC, et al. Methodology for the systematic reviews on adjacent segment pathology. Spine 2012; 37: S10-7.
29. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 1-3. (Pubitemid 36537965)
30. Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG, et al. Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence based approach for the management of chronic LBP. Spine 2011; 36: S10-8.
31. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490.
32. West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientifi c Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47. Prepared by the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, Contract No. 290-97-0011). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.
33. Ahn DK, Park HS, Choi DJ, et al. Survival and prognostic analysis of adjacent segments after spinal fusion. Clin Orthop Surg 2010; 2: 140-7.
34. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A: 1497 -503. (Pubitemid 38886539)
35. Kaito T, Hosono N, Mukai Y, et al. Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 671-9.
36. Sears WR, Sergides IG, Kazemi N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis. Spine J 2011; 11: 11-20.
37. Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee SW, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 1637-43.