Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 137-144

  Dong, Yeob Lee ^a   Jung, Tag Geun ^a   Lee, Sang Ho ^a  

^a Gimpo Airport Wooridul Spine Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Elderly patient; Instrumentation; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEGENERATION; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; LORDOSIS; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINGLE LEVEL INSTRUMENTED MINI OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE INSTABILITY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STENOSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; CASE REPORT; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 52449127200     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/8/137     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, et al: Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28:1560-1566, 2003 (Pubitemid 36877091)
2. Benz RJ, Ibrahim ZG, Afshar P, Garfin SR: Predicting complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:116-121, 2001 (Pubitemid 33599774)
3. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus CR, Blanke KM: Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 24:1712-1720, 1999
4. Brantigan JW, Neidre A: Achievement of normal sagittal plane alignment using a wedged carbon fiber reinforced polymer fusion cage in treatment of spondylolisthesis. Spine J 3:186-196, 2003
5. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, Quinn LM, Persenaire JM: Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 25: 1437-1446, 2000
6. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR II, Glassman SD, Johnson JR: Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2089-2092, 2003
7. Cassinelli EH, Eubanks J, Vogt M, Furey C, Yoo J, Bohlman HH: Risk factors for the development of perioperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and arthrodesis for spinal stenosis: an analysis of 166 patients. Spine 32:230-235, 2007 (Pubitemid 46105810)
8. Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ: Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine 18:1463-1470, 1993
9. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP: The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271-273, 1980 (Pubitemid 11234479)
10. Goldstein JA, Macenski MJ, Griffith SL, McAfee PC: Lumbar sagittal alignment after fusion with a threaded interbody cage. Spine 26:1137-1142, 2001
11. Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, Vieth V, Schneider M, Liljenqvist U: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J 14: 551-558, 2005 (Pubitemid 41159462)
12. Harms JG, Jeszenszky D: The unilateral transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Traumatol 6:88-99, 1998
13. Jang JS, Lee SH: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 3:218-223, 2005
14. Kai Y, Oyama M, Morooka M: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using local facet joint autograft and pedicle screw fixation. Spine 29:41-46, 2004 (Pubitemid 38040971)
15. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Yoshida M: Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after decompression and posterolateral spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine 27:59-64, 2002 (Pubitemid 34219527)
16. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG: Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 51 (5 Suppl):S166-S181, 2002
17. Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Bae SC: The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion. Spine 31: 712-716, 2006
18. Kwon BK, Berta S, Daffner SD, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Grauer JN, et al: Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:469-476, 2003 (Pubitemid 37509265)
19. Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH: Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 7:21-26, 2007
20. Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, Okuyama K, Suzuki T, Sato K: Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 25:1837-1842, 2000 (Pubitemid 30469663)
21. Mummaneni PV, Rodts GE Jr: The mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 57 (4 Suppl):256-261, 2005
22. Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M: Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2714-2720, 2006
23. Park JY, Cho YE, Kuh SU, Cho JH, Chin DK, Jin BH, et al: New prognostic factors for adjacent-segment degeneration after one-stage 360 degrees fixation for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: special reference to the usefulness of pelvic incidence angle. J Neurosurg Spine 7:139-144, 2007
24. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE: Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938-1944, 2004 (Pubitemid 39181056)
25. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, Hall JM, Polly DW Jr, Kuklo TR: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:337-346, 2005
26. Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, LaMarca F, Liu JC, Ondra SL: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery 54:368-374, 2004 (Pubitemid 38209405)
27. Scheufler KM, Dohmen H, Vougioukas VI: Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Neurosurgery 60 (4 Suppl):203-213, 2007
28. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 Suppl:S1-S6, 2005
29. Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD, Kang HS, Choi WC, Jung B, et al: CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3- year follow-up. Spine 32:1012-1018, 2007 (Pubitemid 46642559)
30. Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Vrbos LA, Knight GW, et al: The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25:1617-1624, 2000 (Pubitemid 30460462)
31. Voor MJ, Mehta S, Wang M, Zhang YM, Mahan J, Johnson JR: Biomechanical evaluation of posterior and anterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques. J Spinal Disord 11:328-334, 1998 (Pubitemid 28380893)
32. Wiltse LL, Spencer CW: New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 13:696-706, 1988