Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BJU International

Volumn 110, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1244-1250

  Aboumarzouk, Omar M ^a   Stein, Robert J ^b   Haber, Georges Pascal ^b   Kaouk, Jihad ^b   Chlosta, Piotr L ^c   Somani, Bhaskar K ^d  

^a POOLE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c JAN KOCHANOWSKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

laparoscopy; meta analysis; obesity; partial nephrectomy; renal cell carcinoma; systematic review

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CLAVIEN CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; META ANALYSIS; OBESITY; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; WARM ISCHEMIC TIME;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; OBESITY; OPERATIVE TIME;

EID: 84867743570     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11094.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Calvert RC, Burgess NA,. Urolithiasis and obesity: metabolic and technical considerations. Curr Opin Urol 2005; 15: 113-7
2. Anast JW, Stoller ML, Meng MV, et al,. Differences in complications and outcomes for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical, partial or simple nephrectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 2287-91
3. Colombo JR Jr, Haber GP, Aron M, Xu M, Gill IS,. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese patients. Urology 2007; 69: 44-8
4. Romero FR, Rais-Bahrami S, Muntener M, Brito FA, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR,. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese and non-obese patients: comparison with open surgery. Urology 2008; 71: 806-9
5. Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Lyon MB, Lucioni A, Gerber GS, Shalhav AL,. Analysis of impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic renal surgery. Urology 2007; 69: 38-43
6. Eaton SH, Thirumavalaven N, Katz MH, Babayan RK, Wang DS,. Effect of body mass index on perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1447-50
7. Naeem N, Petros F, Sukumar S, et al,. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in obese patients. J Endourol 2011; 25: 101-5
8. Cha EK, Lee DJ, Del Pizzo JJ,. Current status of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). BJU Int 2011; 108: 935-41
9. Gautam G, Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Zorn KC,. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current perspectives and future prospects. Urology 2009; 74: 735-40
10. Benway BM, Bhayani SB,. Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108: 955-61
11. Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME,. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 2011; 78: 813-9
12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al,. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700
13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13
14. Higgins JPT, Green S,. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011
15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG,. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-60
16. Casp-uk.net. National Health Service's Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). CASP International Network (CASPin) 2010. Available at: http://www.casp-uk.net/. Accessed December 2011
17. Pai M,. Systematic reviews of non-experimental (observational) studies. Cochrane Collaborative Review Group on HIV Infection and AIDS; 2010. Available at: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:mfnDMNN7ynsJ:www.medepi.net/ meta/lectures/Systematic-Reviews-Observational-Studies. ppt+Systematic+reviews+of+non-experimental+(observational)+studies&hl= en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjBih5IarC19T3FQjAyTf1- RN7jDWCHwtNBdhgDf4fYWXCpKgPxlJVFwJFeFK2jh83ESNaFahrtV27xiWfYaavrK2dtvtwsO5YtC6e RZB6n-S8J-BESnmV0syT3GubRRGmmvDGW&sig=AHIEtbTvPKNSLXxLq2Vz5KSvSq0rqWO5eQ. Accessed December 2011
18. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al,. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Ottawa, ON: Ontario Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 2010. [updated 2010; cited 2011]; Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed December 2011
19. Bergstrom A, Hsieh CC, Lindblad P, Lu CM, Cook NR, Wolk A,. Obesity and renal cell cancer-a quantitative review. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 984-90
20. Matin SF, Abreu S, Ramani A, et al,. Evaluation of age and comorbidity as risk factors after laparoscopic urological surgery. J Urol 2003; 170: 1115-20
21. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Bartlett ST, Flowers JL, Jarrell B,. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in the markedly obese living renal donor. Urology 2000; 56: 926-9