Sources of non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines in trauma triage: a decision science study

Implementation Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Mohan, Deepika ^a,b   Rosengart, Matthew R ^a,b   Farris, Coreen ^c   Fischhoff, Baruch ^d   Angus, Derek C ^a   Barnato, Amber E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^d CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical guidelines; Compliance; Heuristics; Perceptual sensitivity; Physician decision making; Signal detection theory; Trauma; Triage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT TRANSFER; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TRIAGE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84867741461     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-103     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. NEJM 2006, 354(4):366-378. 10.1056/NEJMsa052049, 16436768.
2. Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma 2006, 60(2):371-378. 10.1097/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb, 16508498.
3. Demetriades D, Martin M, Salim A, et al. The effect of trauma center designation and trauma voume on outcome in specific severe injuries. Ann Surg 2005, 242(4):512-517. 1402347, 16192811.
4. Mann NC. Assessing the effectiveness and optimal structure of trauma systems: a consensus among experts. J Trauma 1999, 47(3S):S69-S74.
5. Mullins RJ, Mann NC. Population based research assessing the effectiveness of trauma systems. J Trauma 1999, 47(3S):S59-S66.
6. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. The impact of trauma-center care on functional outcomes following major lower-limb trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(1):101-109. 10.2106/JBJS.F.01225, 18171963.
7. Committee on Trauma - American College of Surgeons Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2006, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Committee on Trauma - American College of Surgeons.
8. Macias CA, Rosengart MR, Puyana JC, et al. The effects of trauma center care, admission volume, and surgical volume on paralysis after traumatic spinal cord injury. Ann Surg 2009, 249(1):10-17. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818a1505, 19106669.
9. Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP. A resource-based assessment of trauma care in the United States. J Trauma 2004, 56(1):173-178. 10.1097/01.TA.0000056159.65396.7C, 14749585.
10. Chang DC, Bass RR, Cornwell EE, MacKenzie EJ. Undertriage of elderly trauma patients to state-designated trauma centers. Arch Surg 2008, 143(8):776-781. 10.1001/archsurg.143.8.776, 18711038.
11. Mohan D, Rosengart MR, Farris C, et al. Are the American College of Surgeons' guidelines for the transfer of trauma patients feasible?. Arch Surg 2011, 146:786-792. 10.1001/archsurg.2011.43, 21422329.
12. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?. JAMA 1999, 282(15):1458-1465. 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458, 10535437.
13. US Department of Health and Human Services Model Trauma System Planning and Evaluation https://www.socialtext.net/acs-demo-wiki/index.cgi?regional_trauma_systems_optimal_elements_integration_and_assessment_systems_consultation_guide. Published February 2006. Accessed November 21, 2010, US Department of Health and Human Services.
14. McFall RM, Treat TA. Quantifying the information value of clinical assessments with signal detection theory. Annu Rev Psych 1999, 50:215-241.
15. Swets JA, Dawes RM, Monahan J. Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2000, 1(1):1-26.
16. Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: a power primer. Psych Bull 1992, 112(1):155-159.
17. McGinn T, Wyer PC, Newman TB, et al. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic). CMAJ 2004, 171:1369-1373. 10.1503/cmaj.1031981, 527344, 15557592.
18. Yonelinas AP, Colleen CM. Receiver operating characteristics in recognition memory: a review. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:800-832.
19. Yeater EA, Treat TA, Viken RJ, et al. Cognitive processes underlying women's risk judgment: associations with genderual victimization history and rape myth acceptance. J Consult Clin Psych 2010, 78(3):375-386.
20. DeCarlo TL. Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychol Methods 1998, 3(2):186-205.
21. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection Theory: A User's Guide 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.
22. Thompson C, Dalgleish L, Bucknell T, et al. The effects of time pressure and experience on nurses' risk assessment decisions: a signal detection analysis. Nurs Res 2008, 57(5):302-311. 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313504.37970.f9, 18794714.
23. Shafir E, Tversky A. Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cogn Psychol 1992, 24:449-474. 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90015-T, 1473331.
24. Bastardi A, Shafir E. On the pursuit and misuse of useless information. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 75(1):19-32.
25. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases 2003, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, Daniel K, Paul S, Amos T.
26. Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS, Van Wert MJ, et al. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. J Exp Psychol 2007, 136:623-638.
27. Shah R, Edgar DF, Evans BJW. A comparison of standardized patients, record abstraction and clinical vignettes for the purpose of measuring clinical practice. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2010, 30:209-224.
28. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000, 283(13):1715-1722. 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715, 10755498.
29. Institute of Medicine Clinical guidelines we can trust 2011, National Academies Press, Washington D.C, Institute of Medicine.
30. Birnbaum MH. Base rates in bayesian inference: signal detection analysis of the cab problem. Am J Psychol 1983, 96:85-94.