Validity and reliability of self-reported diabetes in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 176, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 738-743

  Schneider, Andrea L C ^a,b   Pankow, James S ^c   Heiss, Gerardo ^d   Selvin, Elizabeth ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d IL   (United States)

Author keywords

diabetes; validation study

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; DATA SET; DIABETES; DISEASE INCIDENCE; DISEASE PREVALENCE; DISEASE TREATMENT; GLUCOSE; HEALTH RISK; MEDICINE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIET RESTRICTION; DRUG USE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDITY;

ALGORITHMS; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BLOOD GLUCOSE; COHORT STUDIES; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FASTING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84867735533     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws156     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brancati FL, Wang NY, Mead LA, et al. Body weight patterns from 20 to 49 years of age and subsequent risk for diabetes mellitus: the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(9):957-963.
2. Rimm EB, Chan J, Stampfer MJ, et al. Prospective study of cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and the risk of diabetes in men. BMJ. 1995;310(6979):555- 559.
3. Folsom AR, Kushi LH, Anderson KE, et al. Associations of general and abdominal obesity with multiple health outcomes in older women: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(14):2117-2128.
4. Okura Y, Urban LH, Mahoney DW, et al. Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(10):1096-1103.
5. Kriegsman DM, Penninx BW, van Eijk JT, et al. Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients' self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1407-1417.
6. Kehoe R, Wu SY, Leske MC, et al. Comparing self-reported and physician-reported medical history. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139(8):813-818.
7. Haapanen N, Miilunpalo S, Pasanen M, et al. Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records of chronic diseases in middle-aged and elderly Finnish men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(8):762-769.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
9. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(suppl 1): S62-S69.
10. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(4):687-702.
11. Wagenknecht L, Wasserman B, Chambless L, et al. Correlates of carotid plaque presence and composition as measured by MRI: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(4):314-322.
12. American Diabetes Association: clinical practice recommendations 1996. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(suppl 1): S1-S118.
13. US Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of diabetes mellitus. Version 4. Washington, DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense;(http://www.healthquality.va.gov/diabetes/DM2010-SUM-v4.pdf). (Accessed November 11, 2011).
14. Huerta JM, Tormo MJ, Egea-Caparrós JM, et al. Accuracy of self-reported diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia in the adult Spanish population. DINO study findings. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(2):143-152.
15. Lima-Costa MF, Peixoto SV, Firmo JO, et al. Validity of self-reported diabetes and its determinants: evidence from the Bambuí study. (In Portuguese). Rev Saude Publica. 2007; 41(6):947-953.
16. Goldman N, Lin IF, Weinstein M, et al. Evaluating the quality of self-reports of hypertension and diabetes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(2):148-154.
17. Bielinski SJ, Pankow JS, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, et al. Strength of association for incident diabetes risk factors according to diabetes case definitions: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(5): 466-472.