Validity of self-reported diabetes and its determinants: Evidences from the Bambuí study;Validade do diabetes auto-referido e seus determinantes: Evidências do projeto Bambuí

Revista de Saude Publica

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 947-953

  Lima Costa, Maria Fernanda ^a,b   Peixoto, Sérgio Viana ^a   Firmo, Josélia Oliveira Araújo ^a   Uchoa, Elizabeth ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Health of the elderly; Questionnaires; Sensitivity and specificity; Validation studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049098443     PISSN: 00348910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102007000600009     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bittencourt RJ, Chaves SR, Amado RC, Mendonça VF, Oliveira FJ, Antunes CM. Validação de inquérito de risco referido para vigilância em saúde de fatores de risco de doença arterial coronariana em servidores públicos estaduais de Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20(3):761-70.
2. Goldman N, Lin I-F, Weinstein M, Lin Y-H. Evaluating the quality of self-reports of hypertension and diabetes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(2):148-54.
3. Lima-Costa MF, Peixoto SV, Firmo JO. Validade da hipertensão arterial auto-referída e seus determinantes (Projeto Bambuí). Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38(5):637-42.
4. Costa MF, Uchoa E, Guerra HL, Firmo JO, Vidigal PG, Barreto SM. The Bambuí Health and Ageing Study (BHAS): Methodological approach and preliminary results of a population-based cohort study of the elderly in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2000;34(2):126-35.
5. Loyola Filho Al, Uchoa E, Firmo JOA, Lima-Costa MF. Estudo de base populacional sobre o consumo de medicamentos entre idosos: Projeto Bambuí. Cad Saude Publica. 2005;21(2):545-53.
6. Malerbi DA, Franco LJ. Multicenter study of the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in the urban Brazilian population aged 30-69 yr. The Brazilian Cooperative Group on the Study of Diabetes Prevalence. Diabetes Care. 1992;15(11):1509-16.
7. Molenaar EA, Van Ameijden EJ, Grobbee DE, Numans ME. Comparison of routine care self-reported and biometrical data on hypertension and diabetes: results of the Utrecht Health Project. Eur J Public Health [periódico na internet]. 2007 [acesso em 15/6/20071; 17(2):199-205. Disponível em: http://eurpub.oxfordjournals.org/ cgi/rapidpdf/ckl113v18.
8. Okura Y, Urban LH, Mahoney DW, Jacobsen SJ, Rodeheffer RJ. Agreement between self-reported questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(10):1096-103.
9. Passos VM, Barreto SM, Diniz LM, Lima-Costa MF. Type 2 diabetes: prevalence and associated factors in a Brazilian community - the Bambuí health and aging study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2005;123(2):66-71.
10. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R,. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabeles Care. 2003;26(11):3160-7.
11. Vargas CM, BurtVL, Gillum R, Pamuk ER. Validity of self-reported hypertension in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988-1991. Prev Med. 1997;26(5 Pt 1):678-85.
12. Wu SC, Li CY, Ke DS. The agreement between self-reporting and clinical diagnosis for selected medical conditions among the elderly in Taiwan. Public Health. 2000;114(2):137-42.
13. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;59(7):702-6.