Repositories in Google Scholar Metrics or what is this document type doing in a place as such?

Cybermetrics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  López Cózar, Emilio Delgado ^a   Robinson García, Nicolás ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Evaluation; Google scholar; Google scholar metrics; H index; Ranking; Repositories; Scientific journals

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867710737     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11375019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aguillo, I (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2): 343-351.
2. Albert, KM (2006). Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(3): 253-262.
3. Arlitsch, K.; O'Brien, P (2012). Invisible institutional repositories: Addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google Scholar. Library Hi Tech 30; 1: 60-81
4. Beel, J. and Gipp, B. (2010). Academic search engine spam and Google Scholar's resilience against it. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 13(3).
5. Bollen, J.; Van de Sompel, H.; Hagberg, A. & Chute, R. (2009). A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures. PLOS One 4(6): e6022.
6. Cabezas Clavijo, Á & Delgado López-Cózar, E (2012). Scholar Metrics: the impact of journals according to Google, just an amusement or a valid scientific tool? EC3 Working Papers, 1. Accessible at: http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/16836.
7. Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-Garcia, N. & Torres-Salinas, D. (2012). Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting. EC3 Working Papers, 6. Accessible at: http://hdl.handle.net/10481/20469.
8. Harzing, A-W (2012a). Document Categories in the ISI Web of Knowledge: Misunderstanding the Social Sciences? Scientometrics, accepted for publication. Accessible at: http://www.harzing.com/download/isi.pdf.
9. Harzing A-W (2012b). A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: A longitudinal study of Nobel Prize winners. Scientometrics, accepted for publication. Accessible at: http://www.harzing.com/download/nobelists.pdf.
10. Jacsó, P (2010). Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: is it too little, too late? Online Information Review, 36(1): 126-141.
11. Jacsó, P (2012). Google Scholar Metrics for Publications - The software and content feature of a new open access bibliometric service. Online Information Review, 36(4): 604-619.
12. Krichel, T (2000). Working towards an Open Library for Economics: The RePEc project. PEAK, Conference Arbor, 23-24 March 2000. Accessible at: http://openlib.org/home/krichel/myers.html.
13. Lozano, GA, Larivière, V. & Gingras, Y. (2012). The weakening relationship between the Impact Factor and papers' citations in the digital age. ARXIV, arXiv:1205.4328v1
14. Moed, HF (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer.
15. Priem, J, Parra, C, Piwowar, H, Groth, P and Waagmeester, A (2012). Uncovering impacts: a case study in using altmetrics tools. Second International Conference on the Future of Scholarly Communication and Scientific Publishing (Sepublica2012), Heraklion, Greece, May 27.
16. Sugimoto, CR (2012). Talking the Measure of Metrics: Interviews with Four ASIS&T Members. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(6): 33-38.
17. Torres-Salinas, D.; Ruiz-Pérez, R. & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2009). Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluación científica. El profesional de la información, 18(5): 501-510.
18. Van Leeuwen, TN, Moed, HF, Tijssen, RJW, Visser, MS & van Raan, AFJ (2001). Language biases coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1): 335-346.