Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluación científica

Profesional de la Informacion

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 501-510

  Torres Salinas, Daniel ^a   Ruiz Pérez, Rafael ^b   Delgado López Cózar, Emilio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b Campus Cartuja   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Bibliometrics indicators; Citations; Google Acad mico; Google Scholar; Scientific publications; Scopus; Web of Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349653930     PISSN: 13866710     EISSN: 16992407     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3145/epi.2009.sep.03     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bakkalbasi, Nisa; Bauer, Kathleen; Glover, Janis; Wang, Lei. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical digital libraries 2006, v. 3, n. 7. http://www.bio-diglib.com/ content/3/1/7 http://www.bio-diglib.com/content/3/1/7
2. Bauer, Kathleen; Bakkalbasi, Nisa. An examination of citation counts in a new scholarly communication environment. D-Lib magazine 2005, v. 11, n. 9. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/september05/bauer/09bauer.html
3. Bornmann, Lutz; Marx, Werner; Schier, Hermann; Rahm, Erhard; Thor, Andreas; Daniel, Hans-Dieter. Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry. Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus and Chemical Abstracts. Journal of informetrics 2009, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 27-35. http://lips.informatik.uni- leipzig.de/files/2009-0.pdf http://lips.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/files/2009-0. pdf
4. Friend, Frederick. Google Scholar: potentially good for users of academic information. Journal of electronic publishing 2006, v. 9, v. 1. http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/1771/1/JEP-OA-GS.pdf http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/1771/1/ JE-OA-GS.pdf
5. Hartman, Karen; Mullen, Laura-Bowering. Google Scholar and academic libraries: an update. New library world 2008, v. 109, n. 5-6, pp. 211-222.
6. http://eprints.rclis.org/13820/1/GSfinalupdate.pdf http://eprints.rclis. org/13820/1/GSfinalupdate.pdf
7. Harzing, Anne-Wil K.; Van-der-Wal, Ron. Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in science and environmental politics 2008, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 61-73. http://www.int-res.com/articles/esep2008/8/e008p061.pdf http://www.int-res.com/articles/esep2008/8/e008p061.pdf
8. Jacsó, Péter. As we may search - Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current science 2005a, v. 89, n. 9, pp. 1537-1547. http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/nov102005/1537.pdf http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/ nov102005/1537.pdf
9. Jacsó, Péter. Google Scholar: the pros and the cons. Online information review 2005b, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 208-214. http://www.jacso.info/PDFs/ jacso-google-scholar-pros-and-cons.pdf http://www.jacso.info/PDFs/jacso-google- scholar-pros-and-cons.pdf
10. Jacsó, Péter. Google Scholar revisited. Online information review 2008a, v. 32, n. 1, pp. 102-114. http://www.jacso.info/PDFs/jacso-GS- revisited-OIR-2008-32-1.pdf http://www.jacso.info/PDFs/jacso-GS-revisited-OIR- 2008-32-1.pdf
11. Jacsó, Péter. The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar. Online information review 2008b, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 437-452. http://www.jacso.info/PDFs/jacso-pros-and-cons-of-computing-the-h-index.pdf http://www.jacso.info/PDFs/jacso-pros-and-cons-of-computing-the-h-index.pdf
12. Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike. Google Scholar citations and Google web/url citations: a multi-discipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, v. 58, n. 7, pp. 1055-1065.
13. Kousha, Kayvan; Thelwall, Mike. Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: a comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics 2008, v. 74, n. 2, pp. 273-294.
14. Mayr, Philipp; Walter, Anne-Kathrin. An exploratory study of Google Scholar. Online information review 2007, v. 31, n. 6, pp. 814-830.
15. Meho, Lokman I.; Yang, Kiduk. Multi-faceted approach to citation-based quality assessment for knowledge management. En: World library and information congress: 72nd IFLA General conference and council, 2006.
16. Meho, Lokman I.; Yang, Kiduk. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, v. 58, n. 13, pp. 2105-2125.
17. Neuhaus, Chris; Neuhaus, Ellen; Asher, Alan; Wrede, Clint. The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: an empirical study. Libraries and the Academy 2006, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 127-141.
18. Noruzi, Alireza. Google Scholar: the new generation of citation indexes. Libri 2005, v. 55, n. 4, pp. 170-180.
19. http://www.librijournal.org/pdf/2005-4pp170-180.pdf http://www. librijournal.org/pdf/2005-4pp170-180.pdf
20. Price, Gary. Google Scholar documentation and large pdf files. 2004. http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/041201-105511 http://blog.searchenginewatch. com/041201-105511
21. Robinson, Mary L.; Wusteman, Judith. Putting Google Scholar to the test: a preliminary study. Program 2007, v. 41, n. 1, pp. 71-80. http://www.ucd.ie/ wusteman/articles/robinson-wusteman.pdf http://www.ucd.ie/wusteman/articles/ robinson-wusteman.pdf
22. Schroeder, Robert. Pointing users toward citation searching: using Google Scholar and Web of Science. Libraries and the academy 2007, v. 7, n. 2, pp. 243-248.
23. Shultz, Mary. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. Journal of the Medicl Library Association 2007, v. 95, n. 4, pp. 442-445. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgiartid=2000776 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgiartid=2000776