RelEx: Visualization for actively changing overlay network specifications

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2729-2738

  Sedlmair, Michael ^a   Frank, Annika ^b   Munzner, Tamara ^a   Butz, Andreas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Bertrand AG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

automotive; change management; design study; Network visualization; traffic optimization; traffic routing

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; DATA VISUALIZATION; OVERLAY NETWORKS; SPECIFICATIONS; VISUALIZATION;

AUTOMOTIVE; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; DESIGN STUDIES; NETWORK VISUALIZATION; TRAFFIC OPTIMIZATION; TRAFFIC ROUTING;

USER CENTERED DESIGN;

EID: 84867650813     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.255     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. D. L. Alderson and J. C. Doyle. Catching the "network science" bug: Insight and opportunity for the operations researcher. Operations Research, 56(5):1047-1065, 2008.
2. A. Barsky, T. Munzner, J. Gardy, and R. Kincaid. Cerebral: visualizing multiple experimental conditions on a graph with biological context. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2008), 14(6):1253-60, 2008.
3. S. Borgatti. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1):55-71, 2005. (Pubitemid 40272649)
4. R. Bosch GmbH. Autoelektrik/Autoelektronik, 5. Auflage. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig, Germany, 2007.
5. R. Bosch GmbH. Kraftfahrzeugtechnisches Taschenbuch. 26. Auflage. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig, Germany, 2007.
6. B. Brown, S. Reeves, and S. Sherwood. Into the wild: Challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), p1657-1666. ACM, 2011.
7. M. Broy. Challenges in automotive software engineering. In Proc. ACM Intl. Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE), p33-42, 2006.
8. S. Card, J. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman. Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
9. A. Dix and G. Ellis. Starting simple - adding value to static visualisation through simple interaction. In Proc. Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI), p124-134, 1998.
10. S. P. Dow, A. Glassco, J. Kass, M. Schwarz, D. L. Schwartz, and S. R. Klemmer. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI), 17(4):1-24, 2010.
11. Eclipse Foundation. Eclipse. http://www.eclipse.org/, last visited: 03/12.
12. F. Fischer, F. Mansmann, D. Keim, and S. Pietzko. Large-scale network monitoring for visual analysis of attacks. In Proc. Intl. Workshop Visualization for Computer Security (VizSec), p111-118, 2008.
13. M. Ghoniem, J. Fekete, and P. Castagliola. On the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations: a controlled experiment and statistical analysis. Information Visualization, 4(2):114, 2005.
14. K. Grimm. Software technology in an automotive company: major challenges. In Proc. Intl. Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE), p498-503, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
15. G. Hayes. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI), 18(3):15, 2011.
16. C. Healey, K. Booth, and J. Enns. Harnessing Preattentive Processes for Multivariate Data Visualization. In Proc. Graphics Interface (GI), p107-117, 1993.
17. J. Heer and d. boyd. Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (InfoVis), p32-39, 2005.
18. H. Heinecke. Automotive System Design - Challenges and Potential. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE), p656-657, 2005.
19. N. Henry, A. Bezerianos, and J. Fekete. Improving the Readability of Clustered Social Networks using Node Duplication. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2008), 14(6):1317-1324, 2008.
20. N. Henry and J. Fekete. MatrixExplorer: a dual-representation system to explore social networks. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2006), 12(5):677-684, 2006. (Pubitemid 44955591)
21. N. Henry, J. Fekete, and M. McGuffin. NodeTrix: a hybrid visualization of social networks. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2007), 13(6):1302-1309, 2007. (Pubitemid 350076603)
22. K. Holtzblatt and S. Jones. Contextual inquiry: A participatory technique for system design. In D. Schuler, A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, p177-210. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
23. M. J. Intons-Peterson. Imagery paradigms: How vulnerable are they to experimenters' expectations? Journ. Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance, 9:394-412, 1983.
24. H. Kang, C. Plaisant, B. Lee, and B. Bederson. NetLens: iterative exploration of content-actor network data. Information Visualization, 6(1):18- 31, 2007. (Pubitemid 46598305)
25. B. Lee, C. Plaisant, C. Parr, J. Fekete, and N. Henry. Task taxonomy for graph visualization. In Proc. AVI Workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization (BELIV). ACM, 2006. Article 14.
26. G. Leen, D. Heffernan, and A. Dunne. Digital networks in the automotive vehicle. Computing & Control Engineering Journ., 10(6):257-266, 1999. (Pubitemid 30546558)
27. T. Munzner. Process and pitfalls in writing information visualization research papers. In Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives, p134-153. Springer LNCS 4950, 2008.
28. T. Munzner. A nested model for visualization design and validation. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2009), 15(6):921-928, 2009.
29. T. Munzner, F. Guimbretiere, and G. Robertson. Constellation: a visualization tool for linguistic queries from MindNet. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (InfoVis), p132-135, 1999. (Pubitemid 32213893)
30. G. Namata, B. Staats, L. Getoor, and B. Shneiderman. A dual-view approach to interactive network visualization. In Proc. ACM Conf. Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), p939-942, 2007.
31. C. B. Nielsen, S. D. Jackman, I. Birol, and S. J. M. Jones. ABySSExplorer: visualizing genome sequence assemblies. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2009), 15(6):881-8, 2009.
32. D. A. Norman. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, 1988.
33. C. North and B. Shneiderman. Snap-together visualization: a user interface for coordinating visualizations via relational schemata. In Proc. ACM Conf. Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI), p128-135, 2000.
34. A. Perer, I. Guy, E. Uziel, I. Ronen, and M. Jacovi. Visual social network analytics for relationship discovery in the enterprise. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), p71-79, 2011.
35. A. Perer and B. Shneiderman. Integrating Statistics and Visualization: Case Studies of Gaining Clarity during Exploratory Data Analysis. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), p265-274, 2008.
36. A. Pretorius and J. Van Wijk. Visual inspection of multivariate graphs. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurovis 2008), 27(3):967-974, 2008.
37. A. Pretschner, M. Broy, I. Kruger, and T. Stauner. Software engineering for automotive systems: A roadmap. In Proc. ICSE Workshop on Future of Software Engineering (FOSE'07), p55-71. IEEE Computer Society, 2007. (Pubitemid 47484917)
38. M. Sedlmair. Visual Analysis of In-Car Communication Networks. PhD thesis, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, University of Munich, 2010.
39. M. Sedlmair, P. Isenberg, D. Baur, and A. Butz. Information Visualization Evaluation in Large Companies: Challenges, Experiences and Recommendations. Information Visualization, 10(3):248-266, 2011.
40. M. Sedlmair, P. Isenberg, D. Baur, M. Mauerer, C. Pigorsch, and A. Butz. Cardiogram: Visual analytics for automotive engineers. In Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2011.
41. M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks. IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2012), 2012. In press.
42. B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant. Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In Proc. AVI Workshop on BEyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualization (BELIV), 2006.
43. A. Treisman. Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31(2):156-177, 1985.
44. F. van Ham. Using multilevel call matrices in large software projects. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (InfoVis), p227-232, 2003.
45. F. van Ham, H. Schulz, and J. Dimicco. Honeycomb: Visual Analysis of Large Scale Social Networks. In Proc. Intl. Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), p420-442. Springer-Verlag, 2009.
46. T. von Landesberger, A. Kuijper, T. Schreck, J. Kohlhammer, J. J. van Wijk, J.-D. Fekete, and D. W. Fellner. Visual Analysis of Large Graphs. Proc. Eurographics, 2010.
47. C. Ware. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
48. C. Weaver. Building highly-coordinated visualizations in Improvise. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (InfoVis), p159-166, 2004. (Pubitemid 40449141)
49. W. Willinger, D. Alderson, and J. C. Doyle. Mathematics and the Internet: A source of enormous confusion and great potential. Notices of the American Mathemematical Society, 56(5):586-599, 2009.