A simple model for the spin singlet: Mathematical equivalence of non-locality, slave will and conspiracy

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Volumn 45, Issue 26, 2012, Pages

  Di Lorenzo, Antonio ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867633369     PISSN: 17518113     EISSN: 17518121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/45/26/265302     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bayes T 1763 An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 53 370418
2. Bohm D 1952 A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables: I Phys. Rev. 85 166179
3. Bohm D 1952 A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables: II Phys. Rev. 85 180193
4. Bell J S 1964 On the EinsteinPodolskyRosen paradox Physics 1 195200
5. Rowe M A, Kielpinski D, Meyer V, Sackett C A, Itano W M, Monroe C and Wineland D J 2001 Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection Nature 409 7914 (and references therein) (Pubitemid 32165319)
6. Leggett A J 2003 Nonlocal hidden-variable theories and quantum mechanics: an incompatibility theorem Found. Phys. 33 146993
7. Lee C W, Paternostro M and Jeong H 2011 Faithful test of nonlocal realism with entangled coherent states Phys. Rev. A 83 022102 and references therein
8. Shimony A, Horne M A and Clauser J F 1985 An exchange on local beables: comment on the theory of local beables Dialectica 39 97102
9. Brans C H 1988 Bell's theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variables Int. J. Theor. Phys. 27 21926
10. Hall M J W 2010 Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 250404
11. Barrett J and Gisin N 2011 How much measurement independence is needed to demonstrate nonlocality? Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 100406
12. Gröblacher S, Paterek T, Kaltenbaek R, Brukner Č, Zukowski M, Aspelmeyer M and Zeilinger A 2007 Supplementary information to an experimental test of non-local realism http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7138/ suppinfo/nature05677.html
13. Cerf N J, Gisin N, Massar S and Popescu S 2005 Simulating maximal quantum entanglement without communication Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 220403 (Pubitemid 41636594)
14. Toner B F and Bacon D 2003 Communication cost of simulating Bell correlations Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 187904
15. De Zela F 2008 A non-local hidden-variable model that violates Leggett-type inequalities J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 505301
16. Di Lorenzo A 2012 Comment on A non-local hidden-variable model that violates Leggett-type inequalities J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. at press
17. Clauser J F, Horne M A, Shimony A and Holt R A 1969 Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 8804
18. Bell J S 1971 49th Int. School of Physics Enrico Fermi: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Varenna, Italy,) ed B D'Espagnat (New York: Academic) pp 17181
19. Clauser J F and Horne M A 1974 Experimental consequences of objective local theories Phys. Rev. D 10 52635
20. Shimony A 1990 Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics ed A I Miller (New York: Plenum) pp 3343
21. Jarrett J 1984 On the physical significance of the locality conditions in the Bell arguments Noûs 18 56989
22. Bell J S 1990 Between Science and Technology ed A Sarlemijn and P Kroes (North-Holland: Elsevier) pp 97115
23. Hall M J W 2011 Relaxed Bell inequalities and KochenSpecker theorems Phys. Rev. A 84 022102
24. Branciard C, Brunner N, Gisin N, Kurtsiefer C, Lamas-Linares A, Ling A and Scarani V 2008 Testing quantum correlations versus single-particle properties within Leggett's model and beyond Nature Phys. 4 6815