Rejection Thresholds in Solid Chocolate-Flavored Compound Coating

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Harwood, Meriel L ^a   Ziegler, Gregory R ^a   Hayes, John E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bitterness; Food preference; Methodology; Psychophysics; Rejection threshold

Indexed keywords

DRUG DERIVATIVE; SUCROSE; SUCROSE OCTAACETATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CACAO; CHEMISTRY; DECISION MAKING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILK; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TASTE; TASTE ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; CACAO; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILK; SUCROSE; TASTE; TASTE THRESHOLD; YOUNG ADULT;

THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 84867631730     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: 17503841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02889.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Afoakwa EO, Paterson A, Fowler M. 2007. Factors influencing rheological and textural qualities in chocolate: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 18(6):290-98.
2. ASTM. 2004. Standard E-2263: Paired preference test. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
3. Bartoshuk LM. 1978. The psychophysics of taste. Am J Clin Nutr 31(6):1068-77.
4. Carvalho-da-Silva AM, Van Damme I, Wolf B, Hort J. 2011. Characterisation of chocolate eating behaviour. Physiol Behav 104(5):929-33.
5. Duffy VB, Peterson JM, Bartoshuk LM. 2004. Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake. Physiol Behav 82(2-3):435-45.
6. Frijters JER. 1978. Critical analysis of odor unit number and its use. Chem Sense Flavour 3(2):227-33.
7. Harwood ML, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. 2012. Rejection thresholds in chocolate milk: evidence for segmentation. Food Quality Preference 26(1):128-33.
8. Lee YM, Prescott J, Kim KO. 2008. PROP taster status and the rejection of foods with added tastants. Food Sci Biotechnol 17(5):1066-73.
9. Lucas L, Riddell L, Liem G, Whitelock S, Keast R. 2011. The influence of sodium on liking and consumption of salty food. J Food Sci 76(1):S72-6.
10. Prescott J, Norris L, Kunst M, Kim S. 2005. Estimating a "consumer rejection threshold" for cork taint in white wine. Food Quality Preference 16(4):345-49.
11. Saliba AJ, Bullock J, Hardie WJ. 2009. Consumer rejection threshold for 1, 8-cineole (eucalyptol) in Australian red wine. Food Quality Preference 20(7):500-4.
12. Wilson CE, Brown WE. 1997. Influence of food matrix structure and oral breakdown during mastication on temporal perception of flavor. J Sens Stud 12(1):69-86.