Sketchy rendering for information visualization

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2749-2758

  Wood, Jo ^a   Isenberg, Petra ^b   Isenberg, Tobias ^c,d   Dykes, Jason ^a   Boukhelifa, Nadia ^b   Slingsby, Aidan ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b INRIA   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d DIGITEO/CNRS/INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

hand drawn; non photorealistic rendering; NPR; sketch; uncertainty; visualization

Indexed keywords

HAND-DRAWN; NON-PHOTOREALISTIC RENDERING; NPR; SKETCH; UNCERTAINTY;

DATA VISUALIZATION; FLOW VISUALIZATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

DRAWING (GRAPHICS);

EID: 84867627433     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.262     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Z. AlMeraj, B. Wyvill, T. Isenberg, A. A. Gooch, and R. Guy. Automatically mimicking unique hand-drawn pencil lines. Computers & Graphics, 33(4):496-508, 2009. doi> 10.1016/j.cag.2009.04.004
2. J. Bertin. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. ESRI Press, Redlands, California, 2010.
3. N. Boukhelifa, A. Bezerianos, T. Isenberg, and J.-D. Fekete. Evaluating sketchiness as a visual variable for the depiction of qualitative uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2012. This issue.
4. J. Browne, B. Lee, S. Carpendale, N. Riche, and T. Sherwood. Data analysis on interactive whiteboards through sketch-based interaction. In Proceedings, Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 154-157. ACM, New York, 2011. doi> 10.1145/2076354.2076383
5. S. Carpendale. Considering visual variables as a basis for information visualisation. Technical Report #2001-693-16, University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science, 2003. doi> 1880/45758
6. W. Cleveland and R. McGill. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387):531-554, 1984. doi> 10. 1080/01621459.1984.10478080
7. F. Cole, A. Golovinskiy, A. Limpaecher, H. S. Barros, A. Finkelstein, T. Funkhouser, and S. Rusinkiewicz. Where do people draw lines? ACM Transactions on Graphics, 27(3):88:1-88:11, 2008. doi> 10.1145/ 1360612.1360687
8. C. Curtis. Loose and sketchy animation. In SIGGRAPH Technical Sketches, p. 317. ACM, New York, 1998. doi> 10.1145/281388.281913
9. D. J. Duke, P. J. Barnard, N. Halper, and M. Mellin. Rendering and affect. Computer Graphics Forum, 22(3):359-368, 2003. doi> 10.1111/ 1467-8659.00683
10. A. Finkelstein and D. H. Salesin. Multiresolution curves. In Proceedings, SIGGRAPH, pp. 261-268. ACM, New York, 1994. doi> 10.1145/192161. 192223
11. B. Gooch and A. A. Gooch. Non-hotorealistic Rendering. A K Peters, Ltd., Natick, 2001.
12. B. Gooch, E. Reinhard, and A. Gooch. Human facial illustrations: Creation and psychophysical evaluation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 23(1):27-44, 2004. doi> 10.1145/966131.966133 (Pubitemid 44743513)
13. N. G. Gradwohl. Simulation of hand drawn lines in processing. Blog entry: http://www.local-guru.net/blog/2010/4/23/simulation-ofhand- drawn-lines-in-rocessing, 2010.
14. S. Greenberg, S. Carpendale, N. Marquardt, and B. Buxton. Sketching User Experiences: The Workbook. Morgan Kaufmann, 2012.
15. M. D. Gross. Visual languages and visual thinking: Sketch based interaction and modeling. In Proceedings, Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, pp. 7-11. ACM, New York, 2009. doi> 10.1145/ 1572741.1572743
16. N. Halper, M. Mellin, C. Herrmann, V. Linneweber, and T. Strothotte. Psychology and non-hotorealistic rendering: The beginning of a beautiful relationship. In Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, pp. 277-286. Teubner Verlag, Stuttgart, 2003.
17. C. G. Healey and J. T. Enns. Perception and painting: A search for effective, engaging visualizations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22(2):10-15, 2002. doi> 10.1109/38.988741 (Pubitemid 34265885)
18. C. G. Healey, L. Tateosian, J. T. Enns, and M. Remple. Perceptuallybased brush strokes for nonphotorealistic visualization. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 23(1):64-96, 2004. doi> 10.1145/966131.966135 (Pubitemid 44743515)
19. J. Heer and M. Bostock. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using Mechanical Turk to assess visualization design. In Proceedings, CHI, pp. 203-212. ACM, New York, 2010. doi> 10.1145/1753326.1753357
20. P. Hendrikx. SAP BusinessObjects exploration views. Web page: http://www.pieterhendrikx.com/sap-businessobjects-explorationviews/, 2011.
21. J. Hullman, E. Adar, and P. Shah. Benefitting InfoVis with visual difficulties. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2213-2222, 2011. doi> 10.1109/TVCG.2011.175
22. J. Hullman and N. Diakopoulos. Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2231-2240, 2011. doi> 10.1109/TVCG.2011.255
23. T. Isenberg. Evaluating and validating non-hotorealistic and illustrative rendering. In P. Rosin and J. Collomosse, editors, Image and Video based Artistic Stylisation, chapter 15. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2012. To appear.
24. T. Isenberg. Visual abstraction and stylisation of maps. The Cartographic Journal, 2012. To appear. doi> 10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000007
25. T. Isenberg, P. Neumann, S. Carpendale, M. C. Sousa, and J. A. Jorge. Non-hotorealistic rendering in context: An observational study. In Proceedings, Non-hotorealistic Animation and Rendering, pp. 115-126. ACM, New York, 2006. doi> 10.1145/1124728.1124747 (Pubitemid 44059879)
26. N. Kong, J. Heer, and M. Agrawala. Perceptual guidelines for creating rectangular treemaps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6):990-998, 2010. doi> 10.1109/TVCG.2010.186
27. D. Lloyd and J. Dykes. Human-centered approaches in geovisualization design: Investigating multiple methods through a long-term case study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2498-2507, 2011. doi> 10.1109/TVCG.2011.209
28. M. Luboschik, A. Radloff, and H. Schumann. Using NPR-rendering techniques for the visualization of uncertainty. In Posters of IEEE InfoVis. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2010.
29. A. MacEachren, A. Robinson, S. Hopper, S. Gardner, R. Murray, M. Gahegan, and E. Hetzler. Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: What we know and what we need to know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32(3):139-160, 2005. doi> 10.1559/ 1523040054738936 (Pubitemid 41300254)
30. D. Mould, R. L. Mandryk, and H. Li. Emotional response and visual attention to non-hotorealistic images. Computers & Graphics, 36(5), 2012. doi> 10.1016/j.cag.2012.03.039
31. M. Nienhaus and J. Döllner. Sketchy drawings. In Proc., AFRIGRAPH, pp. 73-81. ACM, New York, 2004. doi> 10.1145/1029949.1029963 (Pubitemid 41802509)
32. M. Nienhaus, F. Kirsch, and J. Döllner. Sketchy illustrations for presenting the design of interactive CSG. In Proceedings, Information Visualization, pp. 772-777. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2006. doi> 10.1109/IV.2006.97
33. D. A. Norman. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, Cambridge, 2004.
34. P. Rautek, S. Bruckner, E. Gröller, and I. Viola. Illustrative visualization: New technology or useless tautology? ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 42(3):4:1-4:8, 2008. doi> 10.1145/1408626.1408633
35. Royal Society for the encouragement of the Arts. RSA animate. Web page: http://comment.rsablogs.org.uk/videos/, 2012.
36. A. Santella and D. DeCarlo. Visual interest and NPR: An evaluation and manifesto. In Proceedings, Non-hotorealistic Animation and Rendering, pp. 71-150. ACM, New York, 2004. doi> 10.1145/987657.987669
37. S. Schlechtweg, B. Schönwälder, L. Schumann, and T. Strothotte. Surfaces to lines: Rendering rich line drawings. In Proceedings, WSCG, volume 2, pp. 354-361, 1998.
38. J. Schumann, T. Strothotte, S. Laser, and A. Raab. Assessing the effect of non-hotorealistic rendered images in CAD. In Proceedings, CHI, pp. 35-41. ACM, New York, 1996. doi> 10.1145/238386.238398
39. T. Strothotte, B. Preim, A. Raab, J. Schumann, and D. R. Forsey. How to render frames and influence people. Computer Graphics Forum, 13(3):455-466, 1994. doi> 10.1111/1467-8659.1330455
40. T. Strothotte and S. Schlechtweg. Non-hotorealistic Computer Graphics. Modeling, Animation, and Rendering. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
41. C. Tietjen, T. Isenberg, and B. Preim. Combining silhouettes, shading, and volume rendering for surgery education and planning. In Proceedings, EuroVis, pp. 303-310. Eurographics Association, Goslar, Germany, 2005. doi> 10.2312/VisSym/EuroVis05/303-310
42. E. Tufte. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, 1983.
43. B. Tversky. What do sketches say about thinking? In Proceedings, AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 2002.
44. C. VanLang. Project 5: Information visualization. Web page: http://chasenvanlang.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/project-5- informationvisualization/, 2010.
45. J. Walny, S. Carpendale, N. Riche, G. Venolia, and P. Fawcett. Visual thinking in action: Visualizations as used on whiteboards. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2508-2517, 2011. doi> 10.1109/TVCG.2011.251
46. G. A. Winkenbach and D. H. Salesin. Computer-generated pen-and-ink illustration. In Proceedings, SIGGRAPH, pp. 91-100. ACM, New York, 1994. doi> 10.1145/192161.192184
47. S. Zanola, S. Fabrikant, and A. Çöltekin. The effect of realism on the confidence in spatial data quality in 3D stereoscopic displays. Proceedings, 24th International Cartography Conference, ICC2009:15-21, 2009.