Ultrasonography of the cervix

Ultrasonography in Reproductive Medicine and Infertility

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 103-112

  Aboulghar, Mona ^a   Rizk, Botros ^b  

^a CAIRO UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867606824     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511776854.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Sladkevicius P, Campbell S. Advanced ultrasound examination in the management of subfertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 12(3):221-5.
2. Kagan K, To M, Tsoi E, et al.Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length. BJOG 2006;113(s3): 5-56.
3. Di Saia PJ. Disorders of uterine cervix. In: Scott JR, DiSaia P, Hammond CB, et al., eds. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7th ed.Philadephia, PA: JB Lippincott,1994.
4. Sekyia T, Yoshimatsu K, et al.Detection rate of the cervical gland area during pregnancy by transvaginal sonography in the assessment of cervical maturation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 328.
5. Yoshimatsu K, Sekiya T, Ishihara K, Fukami T, Otabe T, Araki T. Detection of the cervical gland area in threatened preterm labor using transvaginal sonography in the assessment of cervical maturation and the outcome of pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 53(3): 149-56.
6. Pires CR, Moron AF, Mattar R, et al. Cervical gland area as an ultrasonographic marker for preterm delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 93(3): 214-19.
7. Rizk B, Steer C, Tan SL, Mason BA. Vaginal versus abdominal ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval in IVF. Br J Radiol 1990; 63: 638.
8. Steer C, Rizk B Tan SL, Mason BA. Vaginal versus abdominal ultrasound for obtaining uterine artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms. Br J Radiol 1990; 63: 398-9.
9. Steer C, Rizk, B. Tan, SL. Mason BA, Campbell S. Vaginal colour Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance in subfertile population. Br J Radiol 1990; 63: 638.
10. Qureshi IA, Ullah H, Akram MH, et al. Transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography in the evaluation of pelvic pathology. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2004; 14(7): 390-3.
11. To MS, Skentou C, Cicero S, et al. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks’ scan: problems with transabdominal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15(4): 292-6.
12. Andersen HF. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1991; 19(2): 77-83.
13. Raungrongmorakot K, Tanmoun N, Ruangvutilert P, et al. Correlation of uterine cervical length measurement from transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal ultrasonography. J Med Assoc Thai 2004; 87(3): 326-32.
14. Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, To MS, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17(4): 335-40.
15. Kurtzman JT, Goldsmith LJ, Gall SA, Spinnato JA.Transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179(4): 852-7
16. Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45(3): 191-4.
17. Carr DB, Smith K, Parsons L, et al. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96(4): 554-8.
18. Carlan SJ, Richmond LB, O’Brien WF. Randomized trial of endovaginal ultrasound in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89 (3): 458-61.
19. Timor-Tritsch IR, Yunis RA. Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patients suspected of placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol, 1993; 81: 742.
20. Bajo J, Moreno-Calvo FJ, Uguet-de-Resayre C, et al. Contribution of transvaginal sonography to the evaluation of benign cervical conditions. J Clin Ultrasound 1999; 27(2): 61-4.
21. Mansour R. T, Aboulghar MA. Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod 2002; 17(5): 1149-53.
22. Wongsawaeng W. Transvaginal ultrasonography, sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for intrauterine pathology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88(Suppl. 3): S77-81.
23. Leone FP, Lanzani C, Ferrazzi E. Use of strict sonohysterographic methods for preoperative assessment of submucous myomas. Fertil Steril 2003; 79(4): 998-1002.
24. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Clinical implication of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7(2) 161-74.
25. Valdes C, Malini S, Malikanak LR. Ultrasound evaluation of female genital tract anomalies: a review of cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 47: 89-93.
26. Nicolini U, Bellotti M, Bonazzi B, et al. Can ultrasound be used to screen uterine malformations? Fertil Steril 1987; 47: 89-93
27. Reuter KL, Daly DC, Cohen SM. Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 1989; 172: 749-52.
28. Randoph JF Jr, Ying YK, Maier DB, et al. Comparison of real time ultrasonography, hysterosalpingopraphy, and laparoscopy/hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine abnormalities and tubal patency. Fertil Steril 1986; 5: 828-32.
29. Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, et al. Congenital mullerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of threedimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 523-8.
30. Wu MH, Hsu CC Huang KE. Detection of congenital mullerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 1997; 25: 487-92.
31. Airoldi J, Berghella V, Sehdev H, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(3): 553-6.
32. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(3): 551-63.
33. Pinborg A, Loft A, Nyboe Andersen A. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 8602 children born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the role of twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83(11): 1071-8.
34. Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28(3): 220-50.
35. Aboulghar MM, Aboulghar MA, Mourad L, Serour GI. Ultrasound cervical measurement and prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in ICSI pregnancies: a prospective controlled study. Reprod Biomed Online February 2009; 18(2): 296-300.
36. Matijevic R, Grgic O, Vasilj O. Is sonographic assessment of cervical length better than digital examination in screening for preterm delivery in a low- risk population? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85(11): 1342-7.
37. Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, et al. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18(3): 204-10.
38. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 2(5): 312-17.
39. Leung TN, Pang MW, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK. Cervical length at 18-22 weeks of gestatio Cook CM, Ellwood DA. The cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery in’at-risk’ women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15(2): 109-13.
40. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. NEngl J Med 1996; 334(9): 567-72.
41. Kikuchi A, Kozuma S, Marumo G, et al. Local dynamic changes of the cervix associated with incomptent cervix before and after Shirodkar’s operation. J Clin Ultrasound 1998; 26: 371.
42. Parulekar SG, Kiwi R. Dynamic incompetent cervix uteri: sonographic observations. J Ultrasound Med 1988; 7(9): 481-5.
43. Rust OA, Atlas RO, Kimmel S, et al. Does the presence of a funnel increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in a patient with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192(4): 1060-6.
44. Vayssiere C, Favre R, Audibert F, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 22 and 27 weeks to predict spontaneous birth before 32 weeks in twin pregnancies: a French prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187(6): 1596-604.
45. Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, et al. Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10(3): 161-6.
46. To MS, Skentou C, Liao AW, et al. Cervical length and funneling at 23 weeks of gestation in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18(3): 200-3.
47. Bergelin I, Valentin L. Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21(6): 556-63.
48. Bergelin I, Valentin L. Normal cervical changes in parous women during the second half of pregnancy - a prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81(1): 31-8.
49. TsoiE, Akmal S, Rane S, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21(6): 552-5.
50. Fuchs IB, Henrich W, Osthues K, Dudenhausen JW. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24(5): 554-7.
51. Conoscenti G, Meir YJ, D’Ottavio G, et al. Does cervical length at 13-15 weeks’ gestation predict preterm delivery in an unselected population? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21(2): 128-34.
52. Carvalho MH, Bittar RE, Brizot ML, et al. Cervical length at 11-14 weeks’ and 22-24 weeks’ gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21(2): 135-9.
53. Coroleu B, Carreras O, Veiga A, et al. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization.Hum Reprod 2000; 15(3): 616-20.
54. Matorras R, Urquijo E, Mendoza R, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers. Hum Reprod 2002; 17(7): 1762-6.
55. Flisser E, Grifo JA, Krey LC. Transabdominal ultrasound- assisted embryo transfer and pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2006; 85(2): 353-7.
56. Abousetta A, Mansour RT, El Inany H, et al. Among women undergoing embryo transfer is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guided over clinical touch alone? A systematic review of metaanalysis of prospective randomized trials. Fertil Steril 2007; 88(2): 333-41
57. Brown JA, Buckingham K, Abou-setta A, et al. Ultrasound versus clinical touch for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women (Review). Cochrane Library 2007; issue 1.
58. Lorusso F, Depalo R, Bettocchi S, et al. Outcome of in vitro fertilization after transabdominal ultrasound- assisted embryo transfer with a full or empty bladder. Fertil Steril 2005; 84(4): 1046-8.
59. Sallam HN, Agameya AF, Rahman AF, et al. Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17(7): 1767-72.
60. Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother.Hum Reprod 2006; 21(9): 2353-8.
61. Chama CM, Wanonyi IK, Usman JD. From low-lying implantation to placenta praevia: a longitudinal ultrasonic assessment. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24(5): 516-18.
62. Smith RS, Lauria MR, Comstock CH, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography for all placentas that appear to be low-lying or over the internal cervical os.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9(1): 22-4.
63. Ghorab S. Third-trimester transvaginalultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18(2): 103-8.
64. Heer IM, Muller-Egloff S, Strauss A. Placenta praevia - comparison of four sonographic modalities. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27(4): 355-9.
65. Tan NH, Abu M, Woo JL, Tahir HM. The role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of placenta praevia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35(1): 42-5.
66. Sunna E, Ziadeh S. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound for the diagnosis of placenta praevia. J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 19(2):152-4.
67. Chen JM, Zhou QC, Wang RR. Value of transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of placenta previa. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2001; 26(3): 289-90.
68. Bhide A, Prefumo F, Moore J, et al. Placental edge to internal os distance in the late third trimester and mode of delivery in placenta praevia. BJOG. 2003; 110(9): 860-4.
69. Dawson WB, Dumas MD, Romano WM, et al: Translabial ultrasonography and placenta praevia: does measurement of the os- placenta distance predict outcome? J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 441.
70. Opeheimer LW, Farine D, Ritchie JW, et al. What is a low lying placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1036.
71. Fung TY, Lau TK. Poor perinatal outcome associated with vasa previa: Is it preventable? A report of three cases and review of literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12(6): 430-3.
72. Nomiyama M, Toyota Y, Kawano H. Antenatal diagnosis of velamentous umbilical cord insertion and vasa previa with color Doppler imaging.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 426-9
73. Pent D. Vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 151-5.
74. Antoine C, Youn BK, Silverman F, et al. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295-300.
75. Codero DR, Helgott AW, Landy HJ, et al. Non hemorrhagic manifestation of vasa previa. A clinicopathologic case.Obstet Gynecol 1993;: 689-701.
76. Young M, Yu N, Barham K. The role of light and soundand placenta praevia: does measurement of the os- placenta distance predict outcome? J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 441.
77. Opeheimer LW, Farine D, Ritchie JW, et al. What is a low lying placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1036.
78. Fung TY, Lau TK. Poor perinatal outcome associated with vasa previa: Is it preventable? A report of three cases and review of literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12(6): 430-3
79. Nomiyama M, Toyota Y, Kawano H. Antenatal diagnosis of velamentous umbilical cord insertion and vasa previa with color Doppler imaging.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 426-9
80. Pent D. Vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 151-5.
81. Antoine C, Youn BK, Silverman F, et al. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295-300
82. Codero DR, Helgott AW, Landy HJ, et al. Non hemorrhagic manifestation of vasa previa. A clinicopathologic case.Obstet Gynecol 1993;: 689-701.
83. Young M, Yu N, Barham K. The role of light and sound technologies in the detection of vasa previa. Reprod Fertil dev 1991; 3: 439-51
84. Catanzarite V, Maida C, Thomas W, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa: ultrasound findings and obstetric outcome in ten cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18(2): 109-15.
85. Baschat AA. Ante and intrapartum diagnosis of vasa praevia in singleton pregnancies by colour coded Doppler sonography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 79(1): 19-25.
86. Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103 (5 Pt 1): 937-42.
87. Burton G, Saunders DM. Vasa praevia: another cause for concern in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 28(3): 180-1.
88. Englert Y, Imbert MC, Van Rosendael E, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2(2): 155-7.
89. Pyrgiotis E, Sultan KM, Neal GS, Liu HC, Grifo JA, Rosenwaks Z. Ectopic pregnancies after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 1994; 11(2): 79-84.
90. Ginsburg ES, Frates MC, Rein MS, et al. Early diagnosis and treatment of cervical pregnancy in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1994; 61(5): 966-9.
91. Rizk B, Brindsen PR. Embryo migration responsible for ectopic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gyneciol 1990; 163(4): 1639.
92. Aboulghar M, Rizk B. Ultrasonography of the cervix. In: Rizk B, ed. Ultrasonography in Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, chapter 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008; 143-151.
93. Ushakov FB, Elchalal U, Aceman PJ, et al. Cervical pregnancy: past and future. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1997; 52(1): 45-59.
94. Kim TJ, Seong SJ, Lee KJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients treated for cervical pregnancy with or without methotrexate. J Korean Med Sci 2004; 19(6): 848-52.
95. Doekhie BM, Schats R, Hompes PG. Cervical pregnancy treated with local methotrexate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 122(1): 128-30.
96. Sherer DM, Lysikiewicz A, Abulafia O. Viable cervical pregnancy managed with systemic Methotrexate, uterine artery embolization, and local tamponade with inflated Foley catheter balloon. Am J Perinatol 2003; 20(5): 263-7.
97. Mitra AG, Harris-Owens M. Conservative medical management of advanced cervical ectopic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55(6): 385-9.
98. Pascual MA, Ruiz J, Tresserra F, et al. Cervical ectopic twin pregnancy: diagnosis and conservative treatment: case report.Hum Reprod 2001; 16(3): 584-6.
99. Hassiakos D, Bakas P, Creatsas G. Cervical pregnancy treated with transvaginal ultrasound- guided intra-amniotic instillation of methotrexate. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 271(1): 69-72
100. Yildizhan B. Diagnosis and treatment of early cervical pregnancy: a case report and literature review. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2005; 32 (4): 254-6.
101. Kirk E, Condous G, Haider Z, Syed A, Ojha K, Bourne T. The conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27(4): 430-7.