A bad Hempel day: The decoupling of explanation and prediction in computational cognitive modeling

Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 177-183

  Warwick, Walter ^a   Fleetwood, Michael ^b  

^a ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Adaptive Cognitive Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive modeling; Explanation; Prediction

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE MODELING; COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; COGNITIVE PROCESS; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; COMPUTATIONAL COGNITIVE MODELING; END OF THE DAYS; EXPLANATION; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; LOGICAL STRUCTURE; MODELING APPROACH;

FORECASTING; INTEROPERABILITY; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84867539541     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Smith, J. D. and Minda, J. P. (2000). Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 3-27.
2. Roberts, S. and H. Pashler (2000). "How Persuasive Is a Good Fit? A Comment on Theory testing." Psychological Review 107(2): pp358-367.
3. Gluck, K. A., Staszewski, J. J., Richman, H. Simon, H. A., and Delahanty, P. (2001). The right tool for the job: Information-processing analysis in categorization. Proceedings for the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland.
4. Warwick, W., Brockett, C., McIlwaine, S., Hutton, R., & Hahn, B. (2002). Incorporating Models of Recognition-Primed Decision Making in Computer Generated Forces. Paper presented at the Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL.
5. Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 16, 96-101.
6. Hintzman, D. L. (1986a). Judgments of Frequency and Recognition Memory in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model. Eugene, OR: Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences.
7. Hintzman, D. L. (1986b). "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model. Psychological Review, 93(4), 411-428.
8. Anderson, J. & Lebiere, C. The Atomic Components of Thought. (1998). Lawrence Erlbaum. Mahwah, NJ.
9. Best, B. (2006). Using the EPAM Theory to Guide Cognitive Model Rule Induction. Proceedings for the 2006 Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation. SISO. Baltimore, MD.