Efficiency and effectiveness between open and closed innovation: Empirical evidence in South Korean manufacturers

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 967-980

  Bae, Youngim ^a   Chang, Hyunjoon ^b  

^a The Korea Small Business Institute   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

data envelopment analysis; effectiveness; efficiency; fuzzy set theory; Korea Innovation Survey; open innovation

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; MANUFACTURING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

KOREA;

EID: 84867524543     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2012.724164     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Amara, N. and Landry, R. 2005. Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation, 25: 245-59.
2. Aigner, D. and Chu, S. F. 1968. On estimating the industry production function. American Economic Review, 58: 826-39.
3. Becker, W. and Dietz, J. 2004. R&D co-operation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33: 209-23.
4. Bonano, E. J. and Apostolakis, G. E. 1991. Theoretical foundations and practical issues for using expert judgments in uncertainty analysis of high level radioactive waste disposal. Radioactive Waste Management and the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, 16: 137-59.
5. Burgelman, R., Maidique, M. A. and Wheelwright, S. C. 2001. Strategic management of technology and innovation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I. and Tsakanikas, A. 2004. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation, 24: 29-39.
7. Chesbrough, H. 2003. The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44: 35-41.
8. Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm,: 1-12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Chesbrough, H. and Crowther, A. K. 2006. Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36: 229-36.
10. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. and Seiford, L. M. 1994. Data envelopment analysis: Theory, method, and applications, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429-44.
12. Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P. and Voss, C. A. 1998. Development of a technical innovation audit. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 26: 64-91.
13. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Zhu, J. 2000. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Cordero, R. 1990. The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview. Research Policy, 19: 185-92.
15. Debreu, G. 1951. The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica, 19: 273-92.
16. Enkel, E. 2010. Attributes required for profiting from open innovation in networks. International Journal of Technology Management, 52: 344-71.
17. Enkel, E. and Lenz, A. Open innovation metrics system. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference. June21-24. in Vienna, Austria.
18. Enkel, E. and Gassmann, O. Driving open innovation in the front end: The IBM case. Paper presented at the EURAM Conference. May16-19, Paris, France.
19. European Industrial Research Management Association (EIRMA). 2003. Innovation through spinning in and out. Working Group Report WG60, Paris.
20. Faems, D., Looy, B. V. and Debackere, K. 2005. Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22: 238-50.
21. Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120: 253-90.
22. Fey, C. F. and Birkinshaw, J. 2005. External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management, 31: 597-621.
23. Fink, S. L., Jenks, R. S. and Willets, R. D. 1983. Designing and managing organizations, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
24. Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. 2004. "Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes". Paper presented at the Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, July 6-9, in Lisbon, Portugal.
25. Golany, B. and Roll, Y. 1989. An application procedure for DEA. OMEGA, 17: 237-50.
26. Gregoriou, G. N. and Zhu, J. 2005. Evaluating hedge funds and CTA performance: Data envelopment analysis approach, New York: John Wiley.
27. Guan, J. and Ma, N. 2003. Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23: 737-47.
28. Hansen, J. A. 2001. "Technology innovation indicators, a survey of historical development and current practice". In Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Edited by: Feldman, M. P. and Link, A. N. 73-103. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Hoffman, W. and Schlosser, R. 2001. Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium sized enterprises-An empirical survey. Long Range Planning, 34: 357-81.
30. Ili, S., Albers, A. and Miller, S. 2010. Open innovation in the automotive industry. R&D Management, 40: 246-55.
31. Jacobs, D. and Waalkens, J. 2001. Innovatie 2, Vernieuwingen in de innovatiefunctie van ondernemingen, Deventer: Kluwer.
32. Keeney, R. L. 1992. Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Kleinknecht, A., van Montfort, K. and Brouwer, E. 2002. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11: 109-21.
34. Koopmans, T. C. 1951. Efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica, 19: 455-65.
35. Lakhani, K. R. 2008. InnoCentive.com (A). Harvard Business School Case: 608-170, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
36. Laursen, A. and Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 131-50.
37. Leiponen, A. and Helfat, C. E. 2010. Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 224-36.
38. Lichtenthaler, U. 2008. Open innovation in practice: An analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55: 148-57.
39. Lichtenthaler, U. 2009. Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: Examining environmental influences. R&D Management, 39: 317-30.
40. Liou, T. S. and Wang, M. J.J. 1992. Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50: 247-55.
41. Lovell, C. A.K. and Pastor, J. T. 1995. Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Operations Research Letters, 18: 147-51.
42. Mandl, U., A. Dierx, and F. Ilzkovitz. 2008. The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending. Economic Papers 301, European Commission: Brussels.
43. Manoochehri, G. 2010. Measuring innovation: Challenges and best practices. California Journal of Operations Management, 8: 67-73.
44. Mouzas, S. 2006. Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 59: 1124-32.
45. Nieto, M. J. and Santamaria, L. 2007. The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27: 367-77.
46. OECD. 2005. The Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, Paris: OECD.
47. Piller, F. The future of open innovation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference. June21-24. in Vienna, Austria.
48. Reed, R. 1991. An efficiency and effectiveness rationale. Managerial and Decision Economics, 12: 57-66.
49. Rogers, M. 1998. The definition and measurement of innovation. Melbourne Institute Working Paper 10/98.
50. Science and Technology Policy Institute (STEPI). 2008. Korea innovation survey: Manufacturing firms database.
51. Shan, W., Walker, G. and Kogut, B. 1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 387-94.
52. Sohn, K. Y., Yang, J. W. and Kang, C. S. 2001. Assimilation of public opinions in nuclear decision-making using risk perception. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 28: 553-63.
53. Souitaris, V. 2001. External communication determinants of innovation in the context of a newly industrialised country: A comparison of objective and perceptual results from Greece. Technovation, 21: 25-34.
54. Smith, K. 2005. "Measuring innovation". In Understanding innovation-Oxford handbook of innovation, Edited by: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. 148-79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G. and Noorderhaven, N. 2002. External technology sourcing through alliances or acquisitions: An analysis of the application-specific integrated circuits industry. Organization Science, 13: 714-33.
56. Wang, C. K., Wang, K. and Lu, Q. 2003. Effect of venture capitalists' participation in listed companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27 2015-34
57. Wheeler, T.A., S.C. Hora, W.R. Cramond, and S.D. Unwin. 1989. Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events: Expert judgment elicitation. NUREG/CR-4550, Sandia National Laboratories, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
58. Wheelwright, S. C. and Clark, K. B. 1992. Revolutionizing product development-quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality, New York: The Free Press.
59. Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8: 338-53.
60. Zio, E. 1996. On the use of the analytic hierarchy process in the aggregation of expert judgments. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 53: 127-38.