Cod catches taken by the German recreational fishery in the western Baltic Sea, 2005-2010: Implications for stock assessment and management

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 69, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1769-1780

  Strehlow, Harry V ^a   Schultz, Norbert ^a   Zimmermann, Christopher ^a   Hammer, Cornelius ^a  

^a THÜNEN INSTITUTE OF BALTIC SEA FISHERIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

access point survey; angling; effort; harvest; recreational fishery management; recreational fishing; release; resource allocation; stock assessment

Indexed keywords

ANGLING; BIOMASS; CATCH PER UNIT EFFORT; COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY; FISHERY MODELING; FISHERY SURVEY; FISHING EFFORT; GADOID FISHERY; HARVESTING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SAMPLING; STOCK ASSESSMENT; VESSEL;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

EID: 84867493156     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fss152     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BMELV. 2012. Die deutsche Fischereiflotte nach Bundeslandern (Stand: 1. Januar 2011). Bundesministerium fur Ernahrung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Bonn, Germany. www bmelv.de (last accessed 26 March 2012).
2. Borch, T. 2009. Contested coastal commercialisation: marine fishing tourism in Norway. MAST Maritime Studies, 8: 33-51.
3. Bramick, U. 2010. Jahresbericht zur Deutschen Binnenfischerei 2010. Bundesministerium fur Ernahrung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Bonn, Germany. 50 pp. www.portal-fischerei de (last accessed 6 August 2012)
4. CEC. 2001. Commission Regulation (EC) 1639/2001 of 25 July 2001 establishing the minimum and extended Community programmes for the collection of data in the fisheries sector and laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) 1543/2000.
5. CEC. 2004. Commission Regulation (EC) 1581/2004 of 27 August 2004 amending Regulation (EC) 1639/2001 establishing the minimum and extended Community programmes for the collection of data in the fisheries sector and laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) 1543/2000.
6. CEC. 2007. Council Regulation (EC) 1098/2007 of 18 September 2007 establishing a multiannual plan for the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks, amending Regulation (EEC) 2847/93 and repealing Regulation (EC) 779/97.
7. CEC. 2011. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual plan for the Baltic salmon stock and the fisheries exploiting that stock. COM (2011) 470 final - 2011/0206 COD.
8. Coleman, F. C., Figueira, W. F., Ueland, J. S., and Crowder, L. B. 2004. The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations. Science, 305: 1958-1960. (Pubitemid 39287994)
9. Connelly, N. A., Brown, T. L., and Knuth, B. A. 2000. Assessing the relative importance of recall bias and nonresponse bias and adjusting for those biases in statewide angler surveys. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5: 19-29.
10. Cook, M. F., Goeman, T. J., Radomski, P. J., Younk, J. A., and Jacobson, P. C. 2001. Creel limits in Minnesota: a proposal for change. Fisheries, 26: 19-26.
11. Cooke, S. J., and Cowx, I. G. 2004. The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. Bioscience, 54: 857-859.
12. Cox, S. P., Beard, T. D., andWalters, C. 2002. Harvest control in openaccess sport fisheries: hot rod or asleep at the reel? Bulletin of Marine Science, 70: 749-761. (Pubitemid 34923280)
13. Cox, S. P., Walters, C. J., and Post, J. R. 2003. A model-based evaluation of active management of recreational fishing effort. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23: 1294-1302. (Pubitemid 37546016)
14. Dorow, M., and Arlinghaus, R. 2011. A telephone-diary-mail approach to survey recreational fisheries on large geographic scales, with a note on annual landings estimates by anglers in northern Germany. In The Angler in the Environment: Social, Economic, Biological, and Ethical Dimensions. Proceedings of the 5th World Recreational Fishing Conference. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 75, pp. 319-344. Ed. by T. D. Beard, Jr., R. Arlinghaus, and S. G. Sutton. Bethesda, MD.
15. Gigliotti, L. M., and Taylor,W.W. 1990. The effect of illegal harvest on recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 10: 106-110.
16. Groves, R. M. 2006. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70: 646-675.
17. Hussain, A. M. T., and Tschirhart, J. 2010. Optimal harvest licensing when harvest success is uncertain. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92: 125-140.
18. Hussy, K. 2011. Review of western Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) recruitment dynamics. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 1459-1471.
19. ICES. 2006. Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS), 18-27 April 2006, Rostock, Germany. ICES Document CM 2006/ACFM: 24. 640 pp.
20. ICES. 2011. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, 2011. ICES Advice, 2011. Book 8. 135 pp.
21. Lehtonen, R., and Pahkinen, E. 2004. Practical Methods for Design and Analysis of Complex Surveys, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex. 349 pp.
22. Pawson, M. G., Glenn, H., and Padda, G. 2008. The definition of marine recreational fishing in Europe. Marine Policy, 32: 339-350. (Pubitemid 351470852)
23. Pereira, D. L., and Hansen, M. J. 2003. A perspective on challenges to recreational fisheries management: summary of the symposium on active management of recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23: 1276-1282. (Pubitemid 37546014)
24. Pollock, K. H., Hoenig, J. M., Jones, C. M., Robson, D. S., and Greene, C. J. 1997. Catch rate estimation for roving and access point surveys. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17: 11-19. (Pubitemid 27169878)
25. Pollock, K. H., Jones, C. M., and Brown, T. L. 1994. Angler survey methods and their applications in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 25, Bethesda, MD.
26. Post, J. R., and Parkinson, E. A. 2012. Temporal and spatial patterns of angler effort across lake districts and policy options to sustain recreational fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 69: 321-329.
27. Radomski, P. 2003. Initial attempts to actively manage recreational fishery harvest in Minnesota. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23: 1329-1342. (Pubitemid 37546019)
28. Radomski, P. J., Grant, G. C., Jacobson, P. C., and Cook, M. F. 2001. Visions for recreational fishing regulations. Fisheries, 26: 7-18. (Pubitemid 33571242)
29. Shao, J., and Tu, D. 1996. The Jackknife and Bootstrap. Corr. 2nd printing. Springer, New York. 516 pp.
30. Sparrevohn, C. R., and Storr-Paulsen, M. 2012. Using interview-based recall surveys to estimate cod Gadus morhua and eel Anguilla anguilla harvest in Danish recreational fishing. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: 323-330.
31. Sullivan, M. G. 2002. Illegal angling harvest of walleyes protected by length limits in Alberta. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 22: 1053-1063. (Pubitemid 34915297)
32. Sullivan, M. G. 2003. Active management of walleye fisheries in Alberta: dilemmas of managing recovering fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23: 1343-1358. (Pubitemid 37546020)
33. Vølstad, J. H., Korsbrekke, K., Nedreaas, K. H., Nilsen, M., Nilsson, G. N., Pennington, M., Subbey, S., et al. 2011. Probability-based surveying using self-sampling to estimate catch and effort in Norway's coastal tourist fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 1785-1791.
34. Weltersbach, M. S., and Strehlow, H. V. 2011. Comparison of seabased recreational and commercial cod catches in the German Baltic Sea. Poster presentation at the 6th World Recreational Fishing Conference, 1-4 August 2011, Berlin.