Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban planning implementation effectiveness: Evidence from five urban master plans of Beijing

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 108, Issue 2-4, 2012, Pages 103-111

  Long, Ying ^a   Gu, Yizhen ^b   Han, Haoying ^c  

^a Beijing Institute of City Planning   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Beijing; Conformity; Spatiotemporal heterogeneity; Urban expansion; Urban planning implementation

Indexed keywords

EXPANSION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION;

BEIJING; CONFORMITY; SPATIOTEMPORAL HETEROGENEITIES; URBAN EXPANSION; URBAN PLANNING IMPLEMENTATIONS;

URBAN PLANNING;

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GIS; HETEROGENEITY; INCENTIVE; LITERATURE REVIEW; METROPOLITAN AREA; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

EID: 84867491002     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Agarwal C., Green G.L., Grove J.M., Evans T., Schweik C. A review and assessment of land use change modelsDynamics of space, time, and human choice TR NE-297 2002, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Northeast Research Station, Newton Square, PA.
2. Alexander E.R., Faludi A. Planning and plan implementation - Notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 1989, 16:127-140.
3. Batty M., Couclelis H., Eichen M. Urban systems as cellular automata. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 1997, 24:159-164.
4. Beijing Municipal Planning Committee (2006). Beijing Institute of City Planning, Beijing Academy of Urban Planning. 2006 Beijing Urban Planning Atlas (1949-2005). Internal Publication of Beijing Academy of Urban Planning.
5. Beijing Planning Commission Beijing land resources 1988, Beijing SciTech Press, Beijing, (in Chinese).
6. Berke P., Backhurst M., Day M., Ericksen N., Laurian L., Crawford J., et al. What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 2006, 33:581-600.
7. Bourassa S.C., Cantoni E., Hoesh M. Spatial dependence, housing submarkets, and house price prediction. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2007, 35:143-160.
8. Brody S.D., Highfield W.E. Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association 2005, 71:159-175.
9. Brody S.D., Highfield W.E., Thornton S. Planning at the urban fringe: An examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in southern Florida. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 2006, 33:75-96.
10. Brown D.G., Page S., Riolo R., Zellner M., Rand W. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19:153-174.
11. Brueckner J.K., Fansler D.A. The economics of urban sprawl: Theory and evidence on the spatial sizes of cities. Review of Economics and Statistics 1983, 65:479-482.
12. Brueckner J.K. Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs 2001, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. W.G. Gale, J.R. Pack (Eds.).
13. Burchfield M., Overman H., Puga D., Turner M. Causes of sprawl: A portrait from space. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2006, 121:587-633.
14. Cheng J., Masser I. Urban growth modeling: A case study of Wuhan City, PR China. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 62:199-217.
15. Dietzel C., Clarke K. The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2006, 30:78-101.
16. Fang S., Gertner G.Z., Sun Z., Anderson A.A. The impact of interactions in spatial simulation of the dynamics of urban sprawl. Landscape and Urban Planning 2005, 73:294-306.
17. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., Charlton M. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships 2002, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
18. Goodman A.C., Thibodeau T.G. Housing market segmentation. Journal of Housing Economics 1998, 7:121-143.
19. Han H., Lai S., Dang A., Tan Z., Wu C. Effectiveness of urban construction boundaries in Beijing: An assessment. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A 2009, 10:1285-1295.
20. He Y. Planning in restrictions for Beijing urban and rural development. Proceedings of 44th ISOCARP congress 2008, Available online at, Accessed 02.04.12. http://www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/1185.pdf.
21. Hu Z., Lo C.P. Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2007, 31:667-688.
22. Jones C., Leishman C., Watkins C. Intra-urban migration and housing submarkets: Theory and evidence. Housing Studies 2004, 19:269-283.
23. Laurian L., Day M., Berke P., Ericksen N., Backhurst M., Crawford J., et al. Evaluating plan implementation - A conformance-based methodology. Journal of the American Planning Association 2004, 70:471-480.
24. Laurian L., Crawford J., Day M., Kouwenhoven P., Mason G., Ericksen N., et al. Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2010, 37:740-757.
25. Li X., Yang Q.S., Liu X.P. Discovering and evaluating urban signatures for simulating compact development using cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 86:177-186.
26. Li X., Yeh A.G. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002, 16:323-343.
27. Liu X.H., Wang J.F., Liu M.L., Meng B. Spatial heterogeneity of the driving forces of cropland change in China. Science in China Series D-Earth Sciences 2005, 48:2231-2240.
28. Long Y., Mao Q., Dang A. Beijing urban development model: Urban growth analysis and simulation. Tsinghua Science and Technology 2009, 14:787-794.
29. Lv X., Wu W. On the evaluation of urban plan implementation. City Planning Review 2006, 30:41-45. (in Chinese).
30. Mastop H., Faludi A. Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 1997, 24:815-832.
31. McGrath D.T. More evidence on the spatial scale of cities. Journal of Urban Economics 2005, 58:1-10.
32. McGuire T.J., Sjoquist D.L. Urban sprawl and the finances of state and local governments. State and local finances under pressure 2002, Edward Elgar, London. D.L. Sjoquist (Ed.).
33. Muller M.R., Middleton J. A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara region, Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology 1994, 9:151-157.
34. Pajanowski B.C., Brown D.G., Shellito B.A., Manik G.A. Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: A land transformation model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2002, 26:553-575.
35. Peking Municipal Engineering Bureau Peking Urban and Suburb Map 2007, SinoMaps Press, Beijing.
36. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 1974, 82:34-55.
37. Sanders L., Pumain D., Mathian H., Guerin-Pace F., Bura S. SIMPOP: A multiagent system for the study of urbanism. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1997, 24:287-305.
38. Stevenson S. New empirical evidence on heteroscedasticity in hedonic housing models. Journal of Housing Economics 2004, 13:136-153.
39. Sun S., Zhou Y. Evaluation research on urban planning implementation. Urban Planning Forum 2003, 2:15-20. (in Chinese).
40. Talen E. Do plans get implemented?. A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature 1996, 10:248-259.
41. Talen E. After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1996, 16:79-91.
42. Talen E. Success, failure, and conformance: An alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 1997, 24:573-587.
43. Tian L., Shen T. Evaluation of plan implementation in the transitional China: A case of Guangzhou city master plan. Cities 2011, 28:11-27.
44. Verburg P.H., Soepboer W., Veldkamp A., Limpiada R., Espaldon V., Mastura S. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management 2002, 30:391-405.
45. Watkins C.A. The definition and identification of housing submarkets. Environment and Planning A 2001, 33:2235-2253.
46. Wildavsky A. If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy Sciences 1973, 4:127-153.
47. White R., Engelen G. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modeling. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 1997, 24:235-246.
48. Wu F. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: The application to rural-urban land conversions. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002, 16:795-818.
49. Yeh A.G.O., Li X. A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms by using GIS. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 2001, 28:733-753.