Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 86-95

  Ferri, Rita Borromeo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867424919     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02655883     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Blum, W. & Niss, M. (1991). Applied Mathematical Problem Solving, Modelling, Applications and Links to other Subjects - State, Trends and Issues in Mathematics Instruction. In Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, No. 1, 37-68.
3. Blum, W. (1996). Anwendungsbezüge im Mathematik-unterricht - Trends und Perspektiven. In Kadunz, G. et al. (Eds.), Trends und Perspektiven. Schriftenreihe Didaktik der Mathematik, Vol. 23., Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 15-38.
4. Blum, W. & Leiss, D. (2005). "Filling Up" - the problem of independence-preserving teacher interventions in lessons with demanding modelling tasks. Paper for the CERME4 2005, WG 13 Modelling and Applications.
5. Blum, W. & Leiss D. (in press). How do students and teachers deal with mathematical modelling problems? The example "Filling up". In Haines et al. (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics. Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
6. Borromeo Ferri, R. (2004a). Mathematische Denkstile. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
7. Borromeo Ferri, R. (2004b). Mathematical Thinking Styles and Word Problems. In Henn, Hans-Wolfgang & Blum, Werner (Eds.), Pre-Conference Proceedings of the ICMI Study 14, Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education (pp. 47-52), Dortmund.
8. Borromeo Ferri, R. (2004c). Vom Realmodell zum mathematischen Modell - Übersetzungsprozesse aus der Perspektive mathematischer Denkstile. In Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht (p. 109-112), Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
9. Borromeo Ferri, R. (in press). Individual modelling routes of pupils - Analysis of modelling problems in mathematical lessons from a cognitive perspective. In Haines et al. (Eds.,) Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics. Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
10. DeCorte, E, & Verschaffel, L (1981). Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analysis and imptovement. In Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 6, p. 765-779.
11. Hayes, J.R. & Simon, H. (1974). Understanding written problem instructions. In L.W. Gregg (Ed.). Knowledge and cognition (pp. 167-200), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Kaiser, G. (1995). Realitätsbezüge im Mathematikunterricht - Ein Überblick über die aktuelle und historische Diskussion. In Graumann, G. et al. (Eds.) Materialien für einen realitätsbezogenen Mathematikunterricht, (pp. 66-84) Bad Salzdetfurth: Franzbecker.
13. Kaiser, G. (2005). Mathematical Modelling in School - Examples and Experiences. In Kaiser, G. & Henn, H.-W. (Eds.), Mathematikunterricht im Spannungsfeld von Evaluation und Evolution (pp. 99-108) Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
14. Kaiser, G. et al. (in press). Mathematische Modellierung in der Schule. In Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
15. Kintsch, W. & Greeno, J. (1985). Understanding word arithmetic problems. In Psychological Review, vol. 92, No. 1, p. 109-129.
16. Lesh, R. & Doerr, H. (Eds.) (2003). Beyond Constructivismen - Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning and Teaching. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Lesh, R. & Sriraman, B. (2005). Mathematics Education as Design Science. In Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol. 37 (6), p. 490-505.
18. Nesher, P. (1982). Levels of description in the analysis of addition and subtraction. In Carpenter, T.P. & Moser, J.M. & Romberg, T. (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 25-38) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Nesher, P & Hershkowitz, S. & Novotna, J. (2003). Situation model, text base and what else? Factors affecting problem solving. In Educational Studies in Mathematics. An International Journal, vol. 52 (2), p. 151-176.
20. Newell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Maaß, K. (2004). Mathematisches Modellieren im Unterricht. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.
22. Ortlieb, C.P. (2004). Mathematische Modelle und Naturerkenntnis. In mathematica didactica, 27, 2004, 1, p. 23-40.
23. Pollak, H. (1979). The interaction between mathematics and other school subjects. In UNESCO (Eds.), New trends in mathematics teaching IV (pp. 232-248), Paris.
24. Schupp (1989). Mit oder ohne Computer? Computergraphische Hilfen beim Konstruieren von Kegelschnitten. In Mathematiklehren 1989, vol. 37, p. 49.
25. Sriraman, B., & Kaiser, G. (2006). Theory usage and theoretical trends in Europe: A survey and preliminary analysis of CERME4 research reports. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, vol, 38, no. 1, pp. 22-51.
26. Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet (1996). Grounded Theory, Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz.
27. Reusser, K. (1997). Erwerb mathematischer Kompetenzen. In: Weinert/Helmke (Eds.,) Entwicklung im Grundschulalter. (pp. 141-155) Weinheim: Beltz.