Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 2468-2477

  Behroozmand, Roozbeh ^a   Korzyukov, Oleg ^a   Sattler, Lindsey ^a   Larson, Charles R ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY FEEDBACK; DIFFERENT MECHANISMS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; VOICE PITCH;

ACOUSTICS; PHYSICS;

EXPERIMENTS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TIME; VOICE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; TIME FACTORS; VOICE QUALITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867377480     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.4746984     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bauer, J. J., and Larson, C. R. (2003). Audio-vocal responses to repetitive pitch-shift stimulation during a sustained vocalization: Improvements in methodology for the pitch-shifting technique., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1048-1054. 10.1121/1.1592161
2. Bauer, J. J., Mittal, J., Larson, C. R., and Hain, T. C. (2006). Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: An automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2363-2371. 10.1121/1.2173513
3. Behroozmand, R., Karvelis, L., Liu, H., and Larson, C. (2009). Vocalization-induced enhancement of the auditory cortex responsiveness during voice F0 feedback perturbation., Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 1303-1312. 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.04.022
4. Burnett, T. A., Freedland, M. B., Larson, C. R., and Hain, T. C. (1998). Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3153-3161. 10.1121/1.423073
5. Chen, S. H., Liu, H., Xu, Y., and Larson, C. R. (2007). Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1157-1163. 10.1121/1.2404624
6. Davis, P. J., Zhang, S. P., and Bandler, R. (1993). Pulmonary and upper airway afferent influences on the motor pattern of vocalization evoked by excitation of the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the cat., Brain Res. 607, 61-80. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91490-J
7. 0 contours in syllables., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 357-366. 10.1121/1.1424870
8. Greenlee, J., Jackson, A. W., Chen, F., Larson, C. R., Oya, H., Hiroto, K., Chen, H., and Howard, M. A., 3rd (2011). Human auditory cortical activation during self-vocalization., PLOS One 6, 1-15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014744
9. Hain, T. C., Burnett, T. A., Kiran, S., Larson, C. R., Singh, S., and Kenney, M. K. (2000). Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex., Exp. Brain Res. 130, 133-141. 10.1007/s002219900237
10. Houde, J. F., and Jordan, M. I. (1998). Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production., Science 279, 1213-1216. 10.1126/science.279.5354.1213
11. Jones, J. A., and Munhall, K. G. (2000). Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1246-1251. 10.1121/1.1288414
12. Larson, C. R., Sun, J., and Hain, T. C. (2007). Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2862-2872. 10.1121/1.2715657
13. Liu, H., Behroozmand, R., Bove, M., and Larson, C. R. (2011a). Laryngeal electromyographic responses to perturbations in voice pitch auditory feedback., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 3946-3954. 10.1121/1.3575593
14. Liu, H., and Larson, C. R. (2007). Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 3671-3677. 10.1121/1.2800254
15. Liu, H., Meshman, M., Behroozmand, R., and Larson, C. R. (2011b). Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback., Clin. Neurophysiol. 122, 951-957. 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.010
16. Matthews, P. B. C. (1972). Mammalian Muscle Receptors and Their Central Actions (Williams Wilkins, Baltimore), pp. 1-630.
17. Munhall, K. G., MacDonald, E. N., Byrne, S. K., and Johnsrude, I. S. (2009). Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not do compehsate., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 384-390. 10.1121/1.3035829
18. Natke, U., Grosser, J., Sandrieser, P., and Kalveram, K. T. (2002). The duration component of the stress effect in stuttering., J. Fluency Disord. 27, 305-317. 10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00163-8
19. Purcell, D. W., and Munhall, K. G. (2006). Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2288-2297. 10.1121/1.2173514
20. Sapir, S., McClean, M. D., and Larson, C. R. (1983). Human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 315-321. 10.1121/1.388812
21. Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control., Trends Cogn. Sci. 1, 209-216. 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01070-X
22. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration., Science 269, 1880-1882. 10.1126/science.7569931
23. Xu, Y., Larson, C., Bauer, J., and Hain, T. (2004). Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1168-1178. 10.1121/1.1763952