Differential effects of perturbation direction and magnitude on the neural processing of voice pitch feedback

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 951-957

  Liu, Hanjun ^a   Meshman, Michelle ^b   Behroozmand, Roozbeh ^b   Larson, Charles R ^b  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Event related potential (ERP); N1 P2 complex; Pitch feedback perturbation; Vocalization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VOCALIZATION; VOICE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79953028095     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Behroozmand R., Karvelis L., Liu H., Larson C.R. Vocalization-induced enhancement of the auditory cortex responsiveness during voice F0 feedback perturbation. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1303-1312.
2. Behroozmand R, Liu H, Larson CR. Time-dependent neural processing of the auditory feedback during voice pitch error perturbation. J Cogn Neurosci, in press, doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21447. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21447.
3. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int 2001, 5(9/10):341-345.
4. Burnett T.A., Freedland M.B., Larson C.R., Hain T.C. Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 103:3153-3161.
5. Chen S.H., Liu H., Xu Y., Larson C.R. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 121:1157-1163.
6. 0 contours in syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 2002, 111:357-366.
7. Elman J.L. Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions. J Acoust Soc Am 1981, 70:45-50.
8. Hain T.C., Burnett T.A., Kiran S., Larson C.R., Singh S., Kenney M.K. Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex. Exp Brain Res 2000, 130:133-141.
9. Hawco C.S., Jones J.A., Ferretti T.R., Keough D. ERP correlates of online monitoring of auditory feedback during vocalization. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:1216-1225.
10. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Mathalon D.H., Gray M., Ford J.M. Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:180-190.
11. Heinks-Maldonado T.H., Nagarajan S.S., Houde J.F. Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production. Neuroreport 2006, 17:1375-1379.
12. Houde J.F., Nagarajan S.S., Sekihara K., Merzenich M.M. Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study. J Cogn Neurosci 2002, 14:1125-1138.
13. Jones J.A., Munhall K.G. The role of auditory feedback during phonation: studies of Mandarin tone production. J Phon 2002, 30:303-320.
14. Kawahara H. Interactions between speech production and perception under auditory feedback perturbations on fundamental frequencies. J Acoust Soc Jpn 1994, 15:201-202.
15. Larson C.R. Cross-modality influences in speech motor control: the use of pitch shifting for the study of F0 control. J Commun Dirord 1998, 31:489-503.
16. Larson C.R., Burnett T.A., Kiran S., Hain T.C. Effects of pitch-shift onset velocity on voice F0 responses. J Acoust Soc Am 2000, 107:559-564.
17. 0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions. J Acoust Soc Am 2001, 110:2845-2848.
18. Larson C.R., Altman K.W., Liu H., Hain T.C. Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F (0) control. Exp Brain Res 2008, 187:613-621.
19. Liu H., Larson C.R. Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 122:3671-3677.
20. Liu H., Xu Y., Larson C.R. Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 125:2299-2306.
21. Natke U., Kalveram K.T. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001, 44:577-584.
22. Natke U., Donath T.M., Kalveram K.T. Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing. J Acoust Soc Am 2003, 113:1587-1593.
23. Xu Y., Larson C., Bauer J., Hain T. Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 2004, 116:1168-1178.