Perceived information after surgery for colorectal cancer - an explorative study

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1340-1350

  Lithner, M ^a   Johansson, J ^b   Andersson, E ^a   Jakobsson, U ^a   Palmquist, I ^c   Klefsgard, R ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Discharge; HRQOL; Information need; Postoperative

Indexed keywords

ABSCESS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; FEMORAL HERNIA; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART INFARCTION; HEMICOLECTOMY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTESTINAL BLEEDING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; PNEUMONIA; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; REOPERATION; SIGMOIDECTOMY; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGNOSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84867360168     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02982.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Suhonen R, Nenonen H, Laukka A, Valimaki M. Patients' informational needs and information received do not correspond in hospital. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 1167-76.
2. Makaryus AN, Friedman EA. Patients' understanding of their treatment plans and diagnosis at discharge. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 991-4.
3. Williams B. Supporting self-care of patients following general abdominal surgery. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 584-92.
4. WHO. Global cancer rates could increase by 50% to 15 million by 2020. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2003/pr27/en/
5. NBHW. The National Board of Health and Welfare. Cancer statistics colorectal cancer + anus 2009; http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik/statistikdatabas
6. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 2009; 15: 355-8.
7. Cohen F, Lazarus RS. Active coping processes, coping dispositions, and recovery from surgery. Psychosom Med 1973; 35: 375-89.
8. Wennstrom B, Stomberg MW, Modin M, Skullman S. Patient symptoms after colonic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery - a long-term follow-up. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 666-72.
9. Clark PA, Drain M, Gesell SB, Mylod DM, Kaldenberg DO, Hamilton J. Patient perceptions of quality in discharge instruction. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 59: 56-68.
10. Phillips CO, Wright SM, Kern DE, Singa RM, Shepperd S, Rubin HR. Comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 291: 1358-67.
11. McDonald S, Hetrick S, Green S. Pre-operative education for hip or knee replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD003526.
12. Walker JA. What is the effect of preoperative information on patient satisfaction? Br J Nurs 2007; 16: 27-32.
13. Sahay TB, Gray RE, Fitch M. A qualitative study of patient perspectives on colorectal cancer. Cancer Pract 2000; 8: 38-44.
14. Nagler RH, Gray SW, Romantan A et al. Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based survey. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 81(Suppl): 54-62.
15. Ayotte BJ, Allaire JC, Bosworth H. The associations of patient demographic characteristics and health information recall: the mediating role of health literacy. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2009; 16: 419-32.
16. Michelson H, Bolund C, Nilsson B, Brandberg Y. Health-related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 - reference values from a large sample of Swedish population. Acta Oncol 2000; 39: 477-84.
17. Arraras JI, Greimel E, Sezer O et al. An international validation study of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: an instrument to assess the information given to cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2726-38.
18. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365-76.
19. Arraras JI, Wright S, Greimel E et al. Development of a questionnaire to evaluate the information needs of cancer patients: the EORTC questionnaire. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 54: 235-41.
20. Arraras JI, Kuljanic-Vlasic K, Bjordal K et al. EORTC QLQ-INFO26: a questionnaire to assess information given to cancer patients a preliminary analysis in eight countries. Psychooncology 2007; 16: 249-54.
21. Adler J, Paelecke-Habermann Y, Jahn P, Landenberger M, Leplow B, Vordermark D. Patient information in radiation oncology: a cross-sectional pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-INFO26 module. Radiat Oncol 2009; 4: 40.
22. Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38) European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 238-47.
23. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 239-43.
24. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 649-55.
25. ILO. International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-88). http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/isco88/major.htm (accessed 1 July 2010).
26. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 725-33.
27. Olsson M, Gassne J, Hansson K. Do different scales measure the same construct? Three sense of coherence scales J Epidemiol Community Health 2009; 63: 166-7.
28. Berg BL. (2004 5th edition). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
29. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277-88.
30. Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications J Appl Psychol 1993; 78: 98-104.
31. Bubela N, Galloway S, McCay E et al. Factors influencing patients' informational needs at time of hospital discharge. Patient Educ Couns 1990; 16: 21-8.
32. Hendrikx T, Nilsson M, Westman G. Sense of coherence in three cross-sectional studies in Northern Sweden 1994, 1999 and 2004 - patterns among men and women. Scand J Public Health 2008; 36: 340-5.
33. Ptacek JT, Ptacek JJ. Patients' perceptions of receiving bad news about cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 4160-4.
34. Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA. The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology 2005; 14: 831-45; discussion 846-7.