Constructively Responding to Requests for Paraprofessionals: We Keep Asking the Wrong Questions

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 362-373

  Giangreco, Michael F ^a   Doyle, Mary Beth ^b   Suter, Jesse C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b SAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

decision making; inclusive practices; paraprofessionals; reform; service delivery

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867358615     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932511413472     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Causton-Theoharis J.,Giangreco M. F.,Doyle M. B.,Vadasy P. F.Paraprofessionals: The "sous chefs" of literacy instruction.Teaching Exceptional Children. 2007;40 (1): 57-62.
2. Davern L.,Sapon-Shevin M.,D'Aquanni M.,Fisher M.,Larson M.,Black J.,Minondo S.Drawing distinctions between coherent and fragmented efforts at building inclusive schools.Equity and Excellence in Education. 1997;30 (3): 31-39.
3. Doyle M. B.The paraprofessional guide to the inclusive classroom: Working as a team. 2008). The paraprofessional guide to the inclusive classroom: Working as a team (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2008:.
4. Dymond S. K.,Renzaglia A.,Gilson C. L.,Slagor M. T.Defining access to the general curriculum for high school students with significant cognitive disabilities.Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities. 2007;32:1-15.
5. Etscheidt S.Paraprofessional services for students with disabilities: A legal analysis of issues.Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities. 2005;30:60-80.
6. Feldman K.,Denti L.High access instruction: Practical strategies increase active learning in diverse classrooms.Focus on Exceptional Children. 2004;36 (7): 1-12.
7. French N. K.Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices.Journal of Special Education. 2001;35:41-53.
8. Ghere G.,York-Barr J.Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs: Hidden costs and promising practices.Remedial and Special Education. 2007;28:21-32.
9. GiangrecoM. F. (1996). Vermont interdependent services team approach: A guide to coordinating educational support services. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. (Supplement of updated forms and directions available at http://www.uvm.edu/~cdci/rsrp/rsrpvista.html).
10. Giangreco M. F.One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong?.Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities. 2010;48:1-13.
11. Giangreco M. F.Instruction of students with severe disabilities. 2011). Educating students with severe disabilities: Foundational concepts and practices. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed., pp. 1-30). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Prentice Hall.Snell M. E.Brown F., ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education/Prentice Hall; 2011:1-30.
12. GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2003). Guidelines for selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals. Burlington: University of Vermont, Center on Disability and Community Inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.uvm.edu/~cdci/evolve/gsa.html.
13. Giangreco M. F.,Broer S. M.Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?.Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 2005;20:10-26.
14. Giangreco M. F.,Broer S. M.,Edelman S. W.The tip of the iceberg: Determining whether paraprofessional support is needed for students with disabilities in general education settings.Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps. 1999;24:281-291.
15. Giangreco M. F.,Broer S. M.,Suter J. C.Guidelines for selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals: Field-testing in inclusion-oriented schools.Remedial and Special Education. 2011;32:22-38.
16. Giangreco M. F.,Edelman S.,Luiselli T. E.,MacFarland S. Z.Support service decision-making for students with multiple service needs: Evaluation data.Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps. 1996;21:135-144.
17. Giangreco M. F.,Edelman S. W.,Luiselli T. E.,MacFarland S. Z.Reaching consensus about educationally necessary support services: A qualitative evaluation of VISTA.Special Services in the Schools. 1998;13:1-32.
18. Giangreco M. F.,Edelman S.,Nelson C.,Young M. R.,Kiefer-O'Donnell R.Improving support service decision-making: Consumer feedback regarding updates to VISTA.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 1999;46:463-473.
19. Giangreco M. F.,Halvorsen A. T.,Doyle M. B.,Broer S. M.Alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals in inclusive schools.Journal of Special Education Leadership. 2004;17:82-90.
20. Giangreco M. F.,Suter J. C.,Doyle M. B.Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research.Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 2010;20:41-57.
21. Giangreco M. F.,Suter J. C.,Graf V.Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to educational planning for students with disabilities. 2011). Roles of team members supporting students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. In GiangrecoM. F.CloningerC. J.IversonV. S. (Eds.), Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to educational planning for students with disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 197-204). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Giangreco M. F.Cloninger C. J.Iverson V. S., ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2011:197-204.
22. et seq. 2004;:.
23. Jorgensen C. M.,McSheehan M.,Sonnenmeier R.The beyond access model: Promoting membership, participation, and learning for students with disabilities in the general education classroom. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2009:.
24. Malmgren K. W.,Causton-Theoharis J. N.Boy in the bubble: Effects of paraprofessional proximity and other pedagogical decisions on the interactions of a student with behavior disorders.Journal of Research in Childhood Education. 2006;20:301-312.
25. Mueller P. H.,Murphy F. V.Determining when a student requires paraeducator support.Teaching Exceptional Children. 2001;33 (6): 22-27.
26. 20 U.S.C. 70 §§ 6301.et seq. 2001;:.
27. Ouchi W. G.The secret of TSL (total student load): The revolutionary discovery that raises school performance. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2009:.
28. Rea P. J.,McLaughlin V. L.,Walther-Thomas C.Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs.Exceptional Children. 2002;68:203-223.
29. Riggs C. G.,Mueller P. H.Employment and utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings.Journal of Special Education. 2001;35:54-62.
30. RebhornT.SmithA. (2008, April). LRE decision making (Module 15). In Building the legacy: IDEA 2004 training curriculum. Washington, DC: National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.nichcy.org/Laws/IDEA/Pages/BuildingTheLegacy.aspx.
31. Rubie-Davies C. M.,Blatchford P.,Webster R.,Koutsoubou M.,Bassett P.Enhancing learning? A comparison of teacher and teaching assistant interactions with pupils.School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2010;:.
32. Stainback W.,Stainback S.A rationale for the merger of special and regular education.Exceptional Children. 1984;51:102-111.
33. Suter J. C.,Giangreco M. F.Numbers that count: Exploring special education and paraprofessional service delivery in inclusion-oriented schools.Journal of Special Education. 2009;43:81-93.
34. Udvari-Solner A.,Kluth P.Joyful learning: Active and collaborative learning in inclusive classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2007:.
35. Wallace T.,Shin J.,Bartholomay T.,Stahl B.Knowledge and skills for teachers supervising the work of paraprofessionals.Exceptional Children. 2001;67:520-533.
36. Webster R.,Blatchford P.,Bassett P.,Brown P.,Martin C.,Russell A.Double standards and first principles: Framing teaching assistant support for pupils with special educational needs.European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2010;25:319-336.
37. WestEd (n.d.). Least Restrictive Environment Resources Project. Retrieved from http://www.wested.org/cs/we/view/pj/204.
38. Wright's Law (n.d.). Questions and answers about the least restrictive environment requirements of the IDEA. Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/lre.osers.memo.idea.htm.