Implications of energy return on energy invested on future total energy demand

Sustainability

Volumn 3, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2433-2442

  Deng, Shinuo ^a   Tynan, George R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy demand; Eroei; Total energy demand

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867341049     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su3122433     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Fisher, J.C.; Pry, R.H. Simple substittution model of technological change. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1971, 3, 75-88.
2. Marchetti, C. Primary energy substitution models-Interaction between energy and society. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1977, 10, 345-356.
3. Philipson, L.L. Market penetration models for energy-production devices and conservation techniques. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1978, 11, 223-236.
4. Warren, E.H. Solar-energy market penetration models-Science or number mysticism. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1980, 16, 105-118.
5. Bodger, P.S.; Tay, H.S. Logistic and energy substitution models for electricity forecasting-A comparison using New-Zealand consumption data. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1987, 31, 27-48.
6. Silvennoinen, P.; Vaananen, J. Forecasting technological substitution-The logistic model of energy-systems revisited. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1987, 32, 273-280.
7. Prai, L. Projections for energy mix in India. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1989, 48, 5-7.
8. Coppola, L.; Marschoff, C.M. Technology substitution in the energy market-A one-to-one competition approach. Energy 1993, 18, 273-280.
9. Reddy, A.K.N.; Reddy, B.S. Substitution of energy carriers for cooking in Bangalore. Energy 1994, 19, 561-571.
10. Reddy, B.S. A multilogit model for fuel, shifts in the domestic sector. Energy 1995, 20, 929-936.
11. Kwasnicki, W.; Kwasnicka, H. Long-term diffusion factors of technological development: An evolutionary model and case study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1996, 52, 31-57.
12. DeCanio, S.J.; Laitner, J.A. Modeling technological change in energy demand forecasting-A generalized approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1997, 55, 249-263.
13. Grubler, A.; Nakicenovic, N.; Victor, D.G. Modeling technological change: Implications for the global environment. Annu. Rev. Energ. Environ. 1999, 24, 545-569.
14. Grubler, A.; Nakicenovic, N.; Victor, D.G. Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 1999, 27, 247-280.
15. Knapp, K.E. Exploring energy technology substitution for reducing atmospheric carbon emissions. Energy J. 1999, 20, 121-143.
16. Masini, A.; Frankl, P. Forecasting the diffusion of photovoltaic systems in southern Europe: A learning curve approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70, 39-65.
17. Riahi, K.; Rubin, E.S.; Taylor, M.R.; Schrattenholzer, L.; Hounshell, D. Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Energy Econ. 2004, 26, 539-564.
18. Lund, P.D. Exploring past energy changes and their implications for the pace of penetration of new energy technologies. Energy 2010, 35, 647-656.
19. Hall, C.A.S.; Balogh, S.; Murphy, D.J.R. What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must have? Energies 2009, 2, 25-47.