Modeling Technological Change in Energy Demand Forecasting: A Generalized Approach

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 249-263

  Decanio, Stephen J ^a   Laitner, John A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMAND FORECAST; ENERGY DEMAND; INNOVATION DIFFUSION; MODELLING APPROACH; TECHNOLOGY CHOICE;

EID: 0031465886     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1625(97)00002-4     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Energy Information Administration: The National Energy Modeling System: An Overview. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, March 1996.
2. Conlisk, J.: Why Bounded Rationality? Journal of Economic Literature 34(2), 669-700 (1996).
3. DeCanio, S. J.: Economic Modeling and the False Tradeoff Between Environmental Protection and Economic Growth. Manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1996.
4. Koomey, J. G.: Energy Efficiency Choices in New Office Buildings: An Investigation on Market Failures and Corrective Policies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1990.
5. Hausman, J. A.: Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables, Bell Journal of Economics 10(1), 44-54 (1979).
6. Geller, H., and Nadel, S.: Market Transformation Strategies to Promote End-Use Efficiency, Annual Review of Energy and Environment 19, 301-346 (1994).
7. Hartman, R., and Doane, M.: Household Discount Rates Revisited, Energy Journal 7(1), 139-148 (1986).
8. Train, K. E., and Atherton, T.: Rebates, Loans, and Customers' Choice of Appliance Efficiency Level: Combining State- and Revealed Preference Data, Energy Journal 16(1), 55-69 (1995).
9. Cole, H., and Fuller, R.: Residential Energy Decision Making: An Overview with Emphasis on Individual Discount Rates and Responsiveness to Household Income and Prices. Hittman Associates, Columbia, MD, 1980.
10. Meier, A., and Whittier, J.: Consumer Discount Rates Implied by Purchases of Energy Efficient Refrigerators, Energy 8(12), 957-962 (1983).
11. McRae, D.: Rational Models for Consumer Energy Conservation, in Energy and Housing. R. J. Burby and M. E. Marsden, eds., Oelgeschleger, Gunn and Hain, Cambridge, MA, 1980.
12. Decision Analysis Corporation of Virginia: Energy Economics and Demand-Side Management (DSM) Influences on Equipment Choices in the Residential and Commercial Sectors: Draft Review of the Literature, prepared for Energy Information Administration, by Decision Analysis Corporation of Virginia, Vienna, VA, 1996.
13. DeCanio, S. J.: The Energy Paradox: Bureaucratic and Organizational Barriers to Profitable Energy-Saving Investments. Manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 1995.
14. Inglis, M.: Beta Coefficients in NEMS Residential Demand Module. Manuscript, ICF Kaiser, Fairfax, VA, June 23, 1995.
15. Energy Information Administration: Draft Model Documentation Report: Commercial Sector Demand Module of the National Energy Modeling System. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, January 1996.
16. Ross, S. A., and Westerfield, R. W.: Corporate Finance. Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing, St. Louis, MO, 1988.
17. Ibbotson, R. G., and Sinquefield, R. A.: Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation (SBBI) 1987 Yearbook. Ibbotson Associates, Chicago, IL, 1987.
18. Energy Information Administration: Financial Statistics of Major U.S. Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1994. DOE/EIA-0437(94)/1, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, December 1994.
19. Scapens, R. W., and Sale, T. J.: Performance Measurement and Formal Capital Expenditure Controls in Divisionalised Companies, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 8(4), 389-419 (1981).
20. Dixit, A. K., and Pindyck, R. S.: Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994.
21. Hassett, K. A., and Metcalf, G. E.: Energy Conservation Investment, Energy Policy 21(6), 710-716 (1993).
22. Sanstad, A H., Blumstein, C., and Stoft, S. E.: How High Are Option Values in Energy-Efficiency Investments? Energy Policy 23(9), 739-743 (1995).
23. O'Connell, V.: New Risk in Credit Cards: Punitive Rates, Wall Street Journal (July 13, 1995).
24. Kumar, V., and Kumar, U.: Innovation Diffusion: Some New Technological Substitution Models, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 17(2-3), 175-194 (1991).
25. Fisher, J. C., and Pry, R. H.: A Simple Substitution Model of Technological Change, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 3(1), 75-88 (1971).
26. Banks, R. B.: Growth and Diffusion Phenomena. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
27. Modis, T., and Debecker, A.: Innovation in the Computer Industry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 33(3), 267-278 (1988).
28. Griliches, Z.: Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change, Econometrica 25(4), 501-522 (1957).
29. Mansfield, E.: Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation, Econometrica 29(4), 741-766 (1961).
30. Boedecker, E., Cymbalsky, J., Honeycutt, C., Jones, J., Kydes, A. S., and Le, D.: The Potential Impact of Technological Progress on U.S. Energy Markets, Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, 1996.
31. Bass, F. M.: A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables, Management Science 15(5), 215-227 (1969).
32. Blackman, A. W., Jr.: The Rate of Innovation in the Commercial Aircraft Jet Engine Market, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2(3/4), 269-276 (1971).
33. Blackman, A. W., Jr.: A Mathematical Model for Trend Forecasts, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 3(4), 441-152 (1972).
34. Nevers, J. V.: Extensions of a New Product Growth Model, Sloan Management Review 13(2), 77-91 (1972).
35. Dixon, R.: Hybrid Corn Revisited, Econometrica 48(6), 1451-1461 (1980).
36. Olshavsky, R. W.: Time and the Rate of Adoption of Innovations, The Journal of Consumer Research 6(4), 425-428 (1980).
37. Lawrence, K. D., and Lawton, W. H.: Applications of Diffusion Models: Some Empirical Results, in New-Product Forecasting. Y. Wind and V. Mahajan, eds., Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1981.
38. Easingwood, C., Mahajan, V., and Muller, E.: A Nonsymmetric Responding Logistic Model for Forecasting Technological Substitution, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 20(3), 199-213 (1981).
39. Antonelli, C.: The International Diffusion of New Information Technologies, Research Policy 15(3), 139-147 (1986).
40. Bewley, R., and Fiebig, D. G.: A Flexible Logistic Growth Model with Applications in Telecommunications, International Journal of Forecasting 4(2), 177-192 (1988).
41. Gatignon, H., Eliashberg, J., and Robertson, T. S.: Modeling Multinational Diffusion Patterns: An Efficient Methodology, Marketing Science 8(3), 231-247 (1989).
42. Bayus, B. L.: High-Definition Television: Assessing Demand Forecasts for a Next Generation Consumer Durable, Management Science 39(11), 1319-1333 (1993).
43. Labson, B. S., and Gooday, P.: Factors Influencing the Diffusion of Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Technology, Applied Economics 26(9), 917-925 (1994).
44. Energy Information Administration: Draft Model Documentation Report: Residential Sector Demand Module of the National Energy Modeling System. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, January 1996.
45. Xenergy, Inc.: Review and Enhancement to NEMS Technology Choice Models. Final report prepared for DOE/EIA, Xenergy, Inc., Burlington, MA, June 1994.