Evaluation of marine spatial planning

Marine Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 214-229

  Carneiro, Gonçalo ^a  

^a NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conformance; Evaluation; Marine spatial planning; Methodology; Performance

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; MARINE POLICY; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84867334582     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Nolte N. Nutzungsansprüche und Raumordnung auf dem Meer. Hansa Int Marit J 2010, 147:79-83.
2. Douvere F, Ehler C. New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. J Environ Manage 2009, 90:77-88.
3. Ehler C, Douvere F Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides No. 53, ICAM Dossier No. 6. Paris: UNESCO; 2009.
4. Olsen S, Tobey J, Kerr M. A common framework for learning from ICM experience. Ocean Coast Manage 1997, 37:155-174.
5. Morra Imas LG, Rist R. The road to results. Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations 2009, The World Bank, Washington DC.
6. Forss K. Utvärdering som hantverk. Bortom Mallar Och Manualer 2007, Studentlitteratur, Lund.
7. Vedung E. Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning 1998, Studentlitteratur, Lund. 2nd ed.
8. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation. A Systematic Approach 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 7th ed.
9. OECD. Principles for evaluation of development assistance. Paris: OECD Development Assistance Committee; 1991.
10. MAOT. Proposta de plano de ordenamento do espaço marítimo. Vol. 2, tomo 4. Proposta de programa de monitorização. Lisbon: Ministério do Ambiente e do Ordenamento do Território; 2010.
11. Day J. The need and practice of monitoring, evaluating and adapting marine planning and management-lessons from the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Policy 2008, 32:823-831.
12. Douvere F, Ehler C. The importance of monitoring and evaluation in adaptive maritime spatial planning. J Coast Conserv 2011, 15:305-311.
13. Fletcher S, Potts J, Butler C. Effective marine (spatial) planning: a systematic review of evidence. Littoral 2010-Adapting to Global Change at the Coast: Leadership, Innovation, and Investment 08002. 2011. http://dx.doi.org/%2010.1051/litt/201108002.
14. Laurian L, Crawford J, Day M, Kouwenhoven P, Mason G, Ericksen N, et al. Evaluating the outcomes of plans: theory, practice and methodology. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 2010, 37:740-757.
15. Colt AB. The first step in comprehensively evaluating implementation of an integrated estuarine management plan: developing evaluation criteria. Ocean Coast Manage 1994, 24:85-108.
16. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Massachusetts ocean management plan. Vol. 1. Management and Administration. Boston: Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 2009.
17. ESSIM Planning Office. Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Ocean Management Plan. Strategic plan. Dartmouth: Fisheries and Oceans Canada; 2007.
18. Det Kongelige Miljøverndepartement. Oppdatering av forvaltningsplanen for det marine miljø I Barentshavet og havområdene utenfor Lofoten. Meld. St. 10 (2010-2011). Olso: Det Kongelige Miljøverndepartement; 2011.
19. Faludi A. The performance of spatial planning. Plann Pract Res 2000, 15:299-318.
20. Mastop H, Faludi A. Evaluation of strategic plans: the performance principle. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 1997, 24:815-832.
21. Mastop H, Needham B. Performance studies in spatial planning: the state of the art. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 1997, 24:881-888.
22. Vedung E. Four waves of evaluation diffusion. Evaluation 2010, 16:263-277.
23. Oliveira V, Pinho P. Bridging the gap between planning evaluation and programme evaluation: the contribution of the PPR methodology. Evaluation 2011, 17:293-308.
24. Alexander E, Faludi A. Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 1989, 16:127-140.
25. Baer W. General plan evaluation criteria: an approach to making better plans. J Am Plann Assoc 1997, 63:329-344.
26. Walmsley RD. Approaches to the evaluation and assessment of progress and performance of the Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Management (ESSIM) Initiative. Oceans Coast Manage Rep 2006-03. Dartmouth: Fisheries and Oceans Canada; 2006.
27. Ehler C. Conclusions: benefits, lessons learned, and future challenges of marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 2008, 32:840-843.
28. Halpern B, Diamond J, Gaines S, Gelcich S, Gleason M, Jennings S, et al. Near-term priorities for the science, policy and practice of coastal and marine spatial planning (CMSP). Mar Policy 2012, 36:198-205.
29. Chircop A. Teaching integrated coastal management: lessons from the learning arena. Ocean Coast Manage 2000, 43:343-359.
30. Hoch C. Evaluating plans pragmatically. Plann Theor 2002, 1:53-75.
31. Garcia S, Staples D, Chesson J. The FAO guidelines for the development and use of indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries and and Australian example of their application. Ocean Coast Manage 2000, 43:537-556.
32. Central Research Unit. Indicators to monitor progress of integrated coastal zone management: a review of worldwide practice. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive; 2001.
33. Bowen R, Riley C. Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast Manage 2003, 46:299-312.
34. Ehler C. Indicators to measure governance performance in integrated coastal management. Ocean Coast Manage 2003, 46:335-345.
35. Olsen S. Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean Coast Manage 2003, 46:347-361.
36. Pomeroy R, Parks J, Watson L. How is you MPA doing? A guidebook of natural and social indicators for evaluating marine protected area management effectiveness 2004, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
37. Belfiore S, Barbière J, Bowen R, Cicin-Sain B, Ehler C, Mageau C, et al. Handbook for measuring the progress and outcomes of integrated coastal and ocean management. IOC Manuals and Guides, 46; ICAM Dossier, 2. Paris: UNESCO; 2006.
38. Hockings M, Stolton S., Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J. Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas 2006, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. 2nd ed.
39. Perrin B. What is a results/performance-based delivery system? An invited presentation to the European Parliament. Evaluation 2011, 17:417-424.
40. A description of the marine planning system for England 2011, DEFRA, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
41. Armytage L. Evaluating aid: An adolescent domain of practice. Evaluation 2011, 17:261-276.
42. Rutherford M, Dickinson M, Gunton T. An evaluation of the national framework for marine planning in Canada. Evironments 2010, 37:47-71.
43. Dickinson M, Gunton T, Rutherford M. Benefits of marine planning: Assessment of the experiences of other jurisdictions. Marine Planning Research Report No.1. http://pncimamatters.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Marine_Planning_Report1_March_09.pdf.
44. Stojanovic T, Ballinger RC, Lalwani CS. Successful integrated coastal management: measuring it with research and contributing to wise practice. Ocean Coast Manage 2004, 47:273-298.
45. Patton M. Evaluation research. 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook 2007, 2. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
46. Talen E. Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. J Plann Lit 1996, 10:248-259.
47. Carmona M, Sieh L. Performance measurement in planning-towards a holistic view. Environ Plann C: Govt Policy 2008, 26:428-454.
48. Billé R. A dual-level framework for evaluating integrated coastal management beyond labels. Ocean Coast Manage 2007, 50:796-807.
49. Oliveira V, Pinho P. Measuring success in planning. Developing and testing a methodology for planning evaluation. Town Plann Rev 2010, 81:307-332.
50. Ravallion M. The mystery of the vanishing benefits: An introduction to impact evaluation. World Bank Econ Rev 2001, 15:115-140.
51. Kenny A, Skjoldal H, Engelhard G, Kershaw P, Reid J. An integrated approach for assessing the relative significance of human pressures and environmental forcing on the status of Large Marine Ecosystems. Prog Oceanogr 2009, 81:132-148.
52. Foley M, Halpern B, Micheli F, Armsby M, Caldwell M, Crain C, et al. Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 2010, 34:955-966.
53. Mayne J. Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Can J Program Eval 2001, 16:1-24.
54. Mayne J. Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect. ILAC Brief 16. Rome: Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative; May 2008.
55. Havsplaneringsutredningen. Kunskap på djupet-kunskapsunderlag för havsplanering. SOU 2011:56. Stockholm: Fritzes; 2011.
56. Levin P, Fogarty M, Murawski S, Fluharty D. Integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:23-28.
57. Francis T, Levin P, Harvey C. The perils and promise of future analysis in marine ecosystem-based management. Mar Policy 2011, 35:675-681.
58. Pauly D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 1995, 10:430.
59. Samhouri J, Levin P, James C, Kershner J, Williams G. Using scientific capacity to set targets for ecosystem-based management: a Puget Sound case study. Mar Policy 2011, 35:508-518.
60. Patton M. Utilization-Focused Evaluation 2008, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 4th ed.
61. Smits P, Champagne F Assessment of the theoretical underpinnings of practical participatory evaluation. Am J Eval 2008, 29:427-442.
62. Talen E. After the plans: methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans. J Plann Educ Res 1996, 16:79-91.
63. Oliveira V. Avaliação em planeamento urbano. Porto: U. Porto Editorial; 2011.