Representations of the temporal envelope of sounds in human auditory cortex: Can the results from invasive intracortical "depth" electrode recordings be replicated using non-invasive MEG "virtual electrodes"?

NeuroImage

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 185-196

  Millman, Rebecca E ^a   Prendergast, Garreth ^a   Hymers, Mark ^a   Green, Gary G R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beamforming; Magnetoencephalography; Phase locking; Time frequency analyses; Virtual electrodes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; GAMMA NERVE FIBER; HUMAN; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSOR; SPEECH; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRODES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867291846     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abrams D.A., Nicol T., Zecker S., Kraus N. Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:3958-3965.
2. Ahissar E., Nagarajan S., Ahissar M., Protopapas A., Mahncke H., Merzenich M.M. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:13367-13372.
3. Aiken S.J., Picton T.W. Human cortical responses to the speech envelope. Ear Hear. 2008, 29:139-157.
4. Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2003, 18:1-12.
5. Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A., Fawcett I.P., Singh K.D. Realistic spatial sampling for MEG beamformer images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 23:120-127.
6. Bidet-Caulet A., Fischer C., Besle J., Aguera P.-E., Giard M.-H., Bertrand O. Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representations of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:9252-9261.
7. Boemio A., Fromm S., Braun A., Poeppel D. Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:389-395.
8. Brugge J.F., Nourski K.V., Oya H., Reale R.A., Kawasaki H., Steinschneider M., Howard M.A.I.I.I. Coding of repetitive transients by auditory cortex on Heschl's gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:2358-2374.
9. Crone N.E., Boatman D., Gordon B., Hao L. Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:565-582.
10. Dalal S.S., Guggisberg A.G., Edwards E., Sekihara K., Findlay A.M., Canolty R.T., Berger M.S., Knight R.T., Barbaro N.M., Kirsch H.E., Nagarajan S.S. Five-dimensional neuroimaging: localization of the time-frequency dynamics of cortical activity. NeuroImage 2008, 40:1686-1700.
11. Dalal S.S., Baillet S., Adam C., Ducorps A., Schwartz D., Jerbi K., Bertrand O., Garnero L., Martinerie J., Lachaux J.-P. Simultaneous MEG and intracranial EEG recordings during attentive reading. NeuroImage 2009, 45:1289-1304.
12. Ding N., Simon J.Z. Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 107:79-89.
13. Dorman M.F., Loizou P.C., Fitzke J., Tu Z. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 104:3583-3585.
14. Drullman R., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 95:1053-1064.
15. Dudley H. Remaking speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1939, 11:169-177.
16. Gourevitch B., Jeannes R.L.B., Faucon G., Liegeois-Chauvel C. Temporal envelope processing in the human auditory cortex: response and interconnections of auditory cortical areas. Hear. Res. 2008, 237:1-18.
17. Gross J., Kujala J., Hämäläinen M., Timmerman L., Schnitzler A., Salmelin R. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98:694-699.
18. Hall S.D., Holliday I.E., Hillebrand A., Singh K.D., Furlong P.L., Hadjipapas A., Barnes G.R. The missing link: analogous human and primate cortical gamma oscillations. NeuroImage 2005, 26:13-17.
19. Herdman A.T., Wollbrink A., Chau W., Ishii R., Ross B., Pantev C. Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry. NeuroImage 2003, 20:995-1005.
20. Hoogenboom N., Schoffelen J.-M., Oostenveld R., Parkes L.M., Fries P. Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space. NeuroImage 2006, 29:764-773.
21. Huang M.-X., Shih J.J., Lee R.R., Harrington D.L., Thoma R.J., Weisend M.P., Hanlon F., Paulson K.M., Li T., Martin K., Miller G.A., Canive J.M. Commonalities and differences among vectorised beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr. 2004, 16:139-158.
22. Johnson S., Prendergast G., Hymers M., Green G.G.R. Examining the effects of one- and three-dimensional spatial filtering analyses in magnetoencephalography. PLoS One 2011, 6:e22251.
23. Kozinska D., Carducci F., Nowinski K. Automatic alignment of EEG/MEG and MRI data sets. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:1553-1561.
24. Lehongre K., Ramus F., Villiermet N., Scwatrz D., Giraud A.-L. Altered low-γ sampling in auditory cortex account for the three main facets of dyslexia. Neuron 2011, 72:1080-1090.
25. Liegeois-Chauvel C., Lorenzi C., Trebuchon A., Regis J., Chauvel P. Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:731-740.
26. Litvak V., Eusebio A., Jha A., Oostenveld R., Barnes G.R., Penny W.D., Zrinzo L., Hariz M.I., Limousin P., Friston K.J., Brown P. Optimized beamforming for simultaneous MEG and intracranial local field potential recordings in deep brain stimulation patients. NeuroImage 2010, 50:1578-1588.
27. Luo H., Poeppel D. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 2007, 5:1001-1010.
28. Millman R.E., Prendergast G., Kitterick P.T., Woods W.P., Green G.G.R. Spatiotemporal reconstruction of the auditory steady-state response to frequency modulation using magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 2010, 49:745-758.
29. Morillon B., Lehongre K., Frackowiak R.S.J., Ducorps A., Kleinschimdt A., Poeppel D., Giraud A.-L. Neurophysiological origin of human brain asymmetry for speech and language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:18688-18693.
30. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2001, 15:1-25.
31. Nourski K.V., Reale R.A., Oya H., Kawasaki H., Kovach C.K., Chen H., Howard M.A., Brugge J.F. Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:15564-15574.
32. Pantev C. Evoked and induced gamma-band activity of the human cortex. Brain Topogr. 1995, 7:321-330.
33. Picton T.E., Skinner C.R., Champagne S.C., Kellet A.J.C., Maiste A.C. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1987, 82:165-178.
34. Picton T.E., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int. J. Audiol. 2003, 42:177-219.
35. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as "asymmetric sampling in time". Speech Commun. 2003, 41:245-255.
36. Prendergast G., Johnson S.R., Green G.G.R. Extracting amplitude modulations from speech in the time domain. Speech Commun. 2011, 53:903-913.
37. Rademacher J., Morosan P., Schormann T., Schleicher A., Werner C., Freund H.J., Zilles K. Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. NeuroImage 2001, 13:669-683.
38. Rees A., Green G.G.R., Kay R.H. Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Hear. Res. 1986, 23:123-133.
39. Robinson S.E., Rose D.F. Current source image estimation by spatially filtered MEG. Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects 1992, 761-765. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam. G. Romani (Ed.).
40. Rosen S. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1992, 33:367-373.
41. Rosen S., Wise R.J.S., Chadha S., Conway E.-J., Scott S.K. Hemispheric asymmetries in speech perception: sense, nonsense and modulations. PLoS One 2011, 6:e24672.
42. Ross B., Borgmann C., Draganova R., Roberts L.E., Pantev C. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:679-691.
43. Sedley W., Teki S., Kumar S., Overath T., Barnes G.R., Griffiths T.D. Gamma band pitch responses in human auditory cortex measured with magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 2012, 59:1904-1911.
44. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.-G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270:303-304.
45. Simon J.Z., Wang Y.D. Fully complex magnetoencephalography. J. Neurosci. Methods 2005, 149:64-73.
46. Slaney M. Auditory toolbox: a Matlab toolbox for auditory modelling work. Tech. Rep. 45, Apple Technical Report 1994, Apple Computer Inc.
47. Stone M.A., Füllgrabe C., Moore B.C.J. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 124:2272-2282.
48. Trujillo L.T., Peterson M.A., Kaszniak A.W., Allen J.J.B. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005, 116:172-189.
49. Van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 44:867-880.
50. Zatorre R.J., Belin P., Penhune V.B. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6:37-46.
51. Zumer J.M., Nagarajan S.S., Krubitzer L.A., Zhu Z., Turner R.S., Disbrow E.A. MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time. Brain Res. 2010, 1345:110-124.