A differentor-based adaptive ontology-matching approach

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 459-475

  Xu, Peigang ^a   Wang, Yadong ^a   Liu, Bo ^a  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

differentor; ontology matching; similarity aggregation; similarity calculation

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION STRATEGY; DIFFERENTOR; ENTITY-LEVEL; INTEROPERATIONS; ONE-TO-ONE MAPPINGS; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; SEMANTIC FEATURES; SEMANTIC WEB APPLICATIONS; SIMILARITY CALCULATION; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84867283041     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551512447906     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gruber TD. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 1995 ; 43 (5-6). 907-928
2. Shah NH, Jonquet C, Chiang AP, Butte AJ, Chen R, Musen MA. Ontology-driven indexing of public datasets for translational bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 ; 10: S1
3. Arch-Int N, Sophatsathit P. A semantic information gathering approach for heterogeneous information sources on WWW. Journal of Information Science. 2003 ; 29 (5). 357-374
4. Poggi A, Lembo D, Calvanese D, De Giacomo G, Lenzerini M, Rosati R. Linking data to ontologies. Journal on Data Semantics. 2008 ; 10: 133-173
5. Euzenat J, Shvaiko P Ontology matching. Berlin: Springer ; 2007 :
6. Alasoud A, Haarslev V, Shiri N. An empirical comparison of ontology matching techniques. Journal of Information Science. 2009 ; 35 (4). 379-397
7. Choi N, Song I, Han H. A survey on ontology mapping. SIGMOD Record. 2006 ; 35 (3). 34-41 (Pubitemid 44547581)
8. Rahm E Schema matching and mapping. Bellahsene Z Bonifati A Rahm E, ed. Berlin: Springer ; 2011: 3-27.
9. Hu W, Qu YZ, Cheng G. Matching large ontologies: a divide-and-conquer approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 2008 ; 67 (1). 140-160
10. Mao M, Peng YF, Spring M. An adaptive ontology mapping approach with neural network based constraint satisfaction. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 2010 ; 8 (1). 14-25
11. Pirrò G, Talia D. LOM: a linguistic ontology matcher based on information retrieval. Journal of Information Science. 2008 ; 34 (6). 845-860
12. Akbari I, Fathian M. A novel algorithm for ontology matching. Journal of Information Science. 2010 ; 36 (3). 324-334
13. Melnik S, Garcia-Molina H, Rahm E. Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering ; San Jose, CA, USA ;. 117.
14. Noy N, Musen MA. The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2003 ; 59 (6). 983-1024
15. Doan A, Madhavan J, Dhamankar R, Domingos P, Halevy A. Learning to match ontologies on the semantic web. VLDB Journal. 2004 ; 12 (4). 303-319
16. Avigdor G, Tomer S. Tuning the ensemble selection process of schema matchers. Information Systems. 2010 ; 35 (8). 845-859
17. Li JZ, Tang J, Li Y, Luo Q. RiMOM: A dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment framework. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2009 ; 21 (8). 1218-1232
18. Ji Q, Haase P, Qi GL. Combination of similarity measures in ontology matching using the OWA operator. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge Base Systems ; Torremolinos, Spain ;. 243.
19. Yager RR. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 1988 ; 18 (1). 183-190
20. Jean-Mary YR, Shironoshita EP, Kabuka MR. Ontology matching with semantic verification. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 2009 ; 7 (3). 235-251
21. Meilicke C, Stuckenschmidt H. Analyzing mapping extraction approaches. Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference, Ontology Matching Workshop ; Busan, Korea ;..
22. Stoilos G, Stamou G, Kollias S. A string metric for ontology alignment. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Semantic Web ; Galway ;. 624.
23. WinklerW. The state record linkage and current research problems (Technique Report, Statistics of Income Division, Internal Revenue Service Publication, 1999).
24. Jaccard P. Itude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles. 1901 ; 37: 547-579
25. Euzenat J, Ferrara A, Hollink L, et al. Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2010. Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference 2010, Ontology Matching Workshop ; Shanghai, China ;..
26. Euzenat J, Ferrara A, van Hage WR, et al. Final results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2011. Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference 2011, Ontology Matching Workshop ; Bonn, Germany ;..
27. Pirro G, Talia D. UFOme: an ontology mapping system with strategy prediction capabilities. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 2010 ; 69 (5). 444-471
28. Do HH, Rahm E. COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases ; Hong Komg, China ;. 610.