LOM: A linguistic ontology matcher based on information retrieval

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 845-860

  Pirro, Giuseppe ^a   Talia, Domenico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Information retrieval for ontology mapping; Linguistic ontology mapping; Lucene; Ontology mapping

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION THEORY; LINGUISTICS; SEARCH ENGINES; SEMANTIC WEB;

BASIC IDEAS; BENCHMARK TESTS; EXECUTION TIMES; KEY PROBLEMS; LINGUISTIC APPROACHES; LINGUISTIC INFORMATIONS; LINGUISTIC ONTOLOGIES; LINGUISTIC ONTOLOGY MAPPING; LINGUISTIC TECHNIQUES; LUCENE; MAPPING MODELS; MATCHING TECHNIQUES; ONTOLOGY MAPPING; ONTOLOGY MAPPINGS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 57249103104     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551508091014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler and O. Lassila, The semantic web, Scientific American (2001). Available at: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=00048144- 10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21&page=1 (accessed 14 December 2007 ).
2. T.R. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontologies, Knowledge Acquisition 5 (2) (1993) 199-220.
3. D. Maier and M.L. Delcambre, Superimposed information for the internet. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on the Web and Databases (Philadelphia, PA, 2003) 1-9.
4. RDF Resource Description Framework. Available at: http://www.w3.org/RDF/ (accessed 14 December 2007 ).
5. OWL Ontology Web Language. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl- features/ (accessed 14 December 2007 ).
6. P. Bouquet, M. Ehrig, J. Euzenat, E. Franconi, P. Hitzler, M. Kra¶tzsch, L. Serafini, G. Stamou, Y. Sure and S. Tessaris, D2.2.1 Specification of a Common Framework for Characterizing Alignment (2005). Available at: http://knowledgeweb.semanticweb.org/semanticportal/deliverables/ D2.2.1v2.pdf (accessed 18 March 2008 ).
7. P. Bouquet, L. Serafini and S. Zanobini, Semantic coordination: a new approach and an application. In: Proceedings of 1st International Semantic Web Conference (Sanibel Island, FL, 2003) 20-23.
8. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, R. Dhamankar, P. Domingos and A.Y. Havely, Learning to match ontologies on the semantic web, VLDB Journal 12 (4) (2003) 303-319.
9. K. Kotis, G.A. Vouros and K. Stergiou, Capturing semantics towards automatic coordination of domain ontologies. In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (Varna, Bulgaria, 2004) 22-32.
10. S. Castano, A. Ferrara and S. Montanelli, H-MATCH: an algorithm for dynamically matching ontologies in peer-based systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases (Berlin, Germany, 2003) 231-250.
11. N. Choi, I. Song and H. Han, A survey on ontology mapping, SIGMOD Record 35 (3) (2006) 34-41.
12. S. Castano, V. De Antonellis and S. De Capitani di Vimercati, Global viewing of heterogeneous data sources, IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering 13 (2) (2001) 277-297.
13. H.H. Do and E. Rahm, COMA - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Hong-Kong, PRC, 2002) 610-621.
14. J. Madhavan, P.A. Bernstein and E. Rahm, Generic schema matching with cupid, In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Rome, Italy, 2001) 49-58.
15. E. Rahm and P.A. Bernstein, A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching, VLDB Journal 10 (4) (2001) 334-350.
16. D. Aumueller, H. Do, S. Massmann and E. Rahm, Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Demonstration) (Baltimore, MD, 2005) 906-908.
17. X. Su and J.A. Gulla, An information retrieval approach to ontology mapping, Data & Knowledge Engineering 58 (1) (2006) 47-69.
18. J. Euzenat, M. Mochol, P. Shvaiko, H. Stuckenschmidt, O. Å va b, V. Sva tek, W.R. Van Hage and M. Yatskevich, Results of the ontology aligment evaluation initiative 2006. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Matching ( Athens, GA, 2006 ).
19. Ontology Alignment and Evaluation Initiative. Available at: http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2006/ (Accessed 13 December 2007 ).
20. J. Euzenat, P. Gagman and P. Valtchev, OLA in the OAEI 2005 alignment contest. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Matching (Banff, Canada, 2005) 97-102.
21. P. Mitra and G. Wiederhold, Resolving terminological heterogeneity in ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Interoperability ( Lyon, France, 2002 ).
22. The Apache Lucene Project. Available at: http://lucene.apache.org (Accessed 13 December 2007 ).
23. R.A. Baeza-Yates and R.N. Berthier, Modern Information Retrieval ( Addison-Wesley, Indianapolis, IN, 1999 ).
24. G. Salton and M.J. McGill, An Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval ( McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983 ).
25. G. Salton, A. Wong and C.S. Yang, A vector space model for automatic indexing, Communications of the ACM 18 (1) (1975) 613-620.
26. G. Pirra2 and D. Talia, An approach to ontology mapping based on the Lucene search engine library. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Web Architectures For Enterprises (Regensburg, Germany, 2007) 407-412.
27. Prota©ga© API. Available at: http://protege.stanford.edu/ plugins/owl/api/ (accessed 13 December 2007 ).
28. J. Euzenat, An API for ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (Hiroshima, Japan, 2004) 698-712.
29. G. Stoilos, G. Stamou and S. Kollias, A string metric for ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (Galway, Ireland, 2005) 623-637.
30. I.V. Levenshtein, Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertion and reversals, Soviet Physics-Doklady 10 (8) (1966) 707-710.
31. G. Miller, WordNet an on-line lexical database, International Journal of Lexicography 3 (4) (1990) 235-312.
32. J. Jiang and D. Conrath, Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proceedings of International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics ( Taiwan, 1997 ).
33. H. Do, S. Melnik and E. Rahm, Comparison of schema matching evaluations. In: Proceedings of GI-Workshop Web and Databases (Erfurt, 2002) 221-237.
34. V.D. Blondel, A. Gajardo, M. Heymans, P. Senellart and P. Van Dooren, A measure of similarity between graph vertices: applications to synonym extraction and web searching, SIAM Review 46 (4) (2004) 647-666.