A growth model for the quadruple helix

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 849-865

  Afonso, Oscar ^a   Monteiro, Sara ^b   Thompson, Maria ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

economic growth; government expenditure; innovation systems; quadruple helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867272335     PISSN: 16111699     EISSN: 20294433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2011.626438     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anagnostopoulou, S. C 2008. R&D expenses and firm valuation: a literature review, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management 16 1: 5-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/18347640810887735
2. Arnkil, R., Jarvensivu, A., Koski, P. and Piirainen, T. 2010. Exploring the Quadruple Helix, Work Research Center, University of Tampere.
3. Barro, R. J 1990. The stock market and investment, Review of Financial Studies 3 1: 115-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/3.1.115
4. Barro, R. J.; Sala-i-Martin, X 2004. Economic Growth, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.
5. Barroso, J. M 2010. Europe 2020: A European Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, European Commission, COM (3.3.2010).
6. Benavie, A.; Grinols, E.; Turnovsky, S. J 1996. Adjustment costs and investment in a stochastic endogenous growth model, Journal of Monetary Economics 38: 77-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(96)01272-X
7. Carayannis, E. G.; Campbell, D. F 2006. Introduction and Chapiters summaries, in Elias, G. C.; Campbell, D. F. J (Eds.). Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters. A Comparative System Approach Accross the United States, Europe and Asia. Praeger, westport, Connecticut, ix - xxvi.
8. Carayannis, E. G.; Campbell, D. F 2009. "Mode 3" and "Quadruple Helix": towards a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management 46 3/4: 201-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
9. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Connolly, M.; Valderrama, D 2005. North-South Technological Diffusion: a New Case for Dynamic Gains from Trade. Duke University WP. Available from Internet:http://econ.duke.edu/~connolly/Working%20Papers/North_South_Tech_Diffusion.pdf
11. Eriksson, M.; Niitamo, V.-P.; Kulkki, S.; Hribernik, K. A 2006. Living labs as a multi-contextual R&D methodology, in The 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services Through Collaborative Networks, ICE 2006. Milan, Italy, 26-28 June 2006
12. Etzkowitz, H.; Klofsten, M 2005. The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development, R&D Management 35 3: 243-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00387.x
13. Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple Helix of University-Industry-Government relations, Research Policy 29 22: 109-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
14. Evans, G., Honkapohja, S. and Romer, P. 1998. Growth cycles. American Economic Review, 88(3): 495-515.
15. Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of Creative Class: and How Its Transforming Work Leisure Community, and Everyday Life, Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
16. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowothy, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge, the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
17. Ginevicius, R. and Korsakiene, R. 2005. The knowledge-based economy in Lithuania: an analysis of tendencies. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 6(4): 231-239.
18. Godin, B 2011. Taking statistics (more) seriously: the measurement of science, technology and innovation and its future, in Montreal: Centre-Urbanisation Culture Société de L'Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, 35.
19. Hayashi, F 1982. Tobin's marginal q and average q: a neoclassical interpretation, Econometrica 50: 213-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912538
20. Irmen, A.; Kuehnel, J 2009. Productive government expenditure and economic growth, Journal of Economic Surveys 23 4: 692-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00576.x
21. Johnson, B 1992. Institutional learning, in Lundvall, B (Ed.). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London.
22. Karnitis, E. 2006. A knowledged-based human-centred growth model for Latvia. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 7(3): 95-101.
23. Khan, M. R.; Al-Ansari, M 2005. Sustainable Innovation as a Corporate Strategy. Available from Internet:http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2005/01/02.pdf
24. Liljemark, T. 2004. Innovation Policy in Canada. Strategy and Realities, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies.
25. MacGregor, S. P.; Marques-Gou, P.; Simon-Villar, A 2010. Gauging readiness for the quadruple helix: a study of 16 European organizations, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 1 3: 173-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0012-9
26. Matsuyama, K. 1995. Complementarities and cumulative processes in models of monopolistic competition. Journal of Economic Literature, 33: 701-729.
27. OECD 2005. Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD.
28. OECD 2009. New Nature of Innovation. Available from Internet:http://www.newnatureofinnovation.org/full_report.pdf
29. Powell, W. W. and Grodal, S. 2005. "Networks of innovators". In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Edited by: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. R. Oxford University Press.
30. Rivera-Batiz, L.; Romer, P 1991. Economic integration and endogenous growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 531-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937946
31. Romer, D 1996. Advanced Macroeconomics. Mc-Graw-Hill Companies, Inc,
32. Thompson, M 2008. Complementarities and costly investment in a growth model, Journal of Economics 94 3: 231-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00712-008-0007-1
33. Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
34. West, M. and Farr, J. 1989. Innovation at work: psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour, 4: 15-30.
35. Whited, T. M. 1992. Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: evidence from panel data. Journal of Finance, 47(4): 1425-1460.
36. Yawson R. M. The ecological system of innovation: a new architectural framework for a functional evidence-based platform for science and innovation policy, in The Future of Innovation Proceedings of the XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference Vienna, Austria June 2009