What counts as "engineering": Toward a redefinition

Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and Beyond

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 59-85

  Pawley, Alice L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867251598     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. American Society for Engineering Education. (2006). ASEE Fiscal Year 2006 Annual Report. Washington, DC: ASEE. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/about- us/annual-report/past-annual-reports/ASEE-2006-annual-report.pdf.
2. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt lute books.
3. Appel, T. A. (1994). Physiology in American women's colleges: The rise and decline of a female subculture. Isis, 85(1), 26-56.
4. Apple, R. (1997). Liberal arts or vocational training? Home economics education for girls. In S. Stage & V. B. Vincenti (Eds.), Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession (pp. 79-95). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5. Baillie, C. (2006). Engineers within a local and global society. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
6. Bix, A. S. (2000, Spring). Engineeresses invade campus: Four decades of debate over technical coeducation. IEEE Technology and Society, 20-26.
7. Bix, A. S. (2002). Equipped for life: Gendered technical training and consumerism in home economics, 1920-1980. Technology and Culture, 43(4), 728-754.
8. Bix, A. S. (2004). From engineeresses to girl engineers to good engineers: A history of women's U.S. engineering education. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 27-49.
9. Blaszczyk, R. L. (1997). Where Mrs. Homemaker is never forgotten: Lucy Maltby and home economics at Corning Glass Works, 1929-1965. In S. Stage & V. B. Vincenti (Eds.), Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession (pp. 163-180). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. Catalano, G. (2007). Engineering, poverty, and the Earth. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
11. Cockburn, C. (1983). Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. London, UK: Pluto Press.
12. Committee on the Engineer of 2020 Phase I. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering.
13. Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages, N. A. o. E. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering Press.
14. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities: Knowledge, power and social change. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
15. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
16. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2005). The bare bones of sex: Part 1-sex and gender. Signs, 30(2), 1491-1527.
18. Foor, C. E., & Walden, S. E. (2009). Imaginary engineering or re-imagined engineering: Negotiating gendered identities in the borderland of a college of engineering. NWSA Journal, 21(2), 41-64.
19. Frehill, L. M. (2004). The gendered construction of the engineering profession in the United States, 1893-1920. Men and Masculinities, 6(4), 383-403.
20. Gamber, W. (2003). Dressmaking. In N. Lerman, R. Oldenziel, & A. P. Mohun (Eds.), Gender & technology: A reader (pp. 238-266). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(December), 781-795.
22. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Grose, T. K. (2006, October). Trouble on the horizon. ASEE Prism, 16, 26-31.
24. Hacker, B. C. (1993). Engineering a new order: Military institutions, technical education, and the rise of the industrial state. Technology and Culture, 34(1), 1-27.
25. Hacker, B. C., & Hacker, S. L. (1987). Military institutions and the labor process: Noneconomic sources of technological change, women's subordination, and the organization of work. Technology and Culture, 28(4), 743-775.
26. Hacker, S. L. (1981). The culture of engineering: Woman, workplace and machine. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 4(3), 341-353.
27. Hacker, S. L. (1989). Pleasure, power and technology: Some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
28. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
29. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
30. Klein, J. T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing: Permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 185-211). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
31. Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
32. Kline, R. (1997). Agents of modernity: Home economists and rural electrification, 1925- 1950. In S. Stage & V. B. Vincenti (Eds.), Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession (pp. 237-252). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
33. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Lerman, N. (2003). Industrial genders: Constructing boundaries. In N. Lerman, R. Oldenziel, & A. P. Mohun (Eds.), Gender and technology: A reader (pp. 123-152). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. Meinert, C. L. (2001). The inclusion of women in clinical trials. In M. Lederman & I. Bartsch (Eds.), The gender and science reader (pp. 303-306). New York, NY: Routledge.
36. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Miller, P. H., Rosser, S. V., Benigno, J. P., & Zieseniss, M. L. (2000). A desire to help others: Goals of high-achieving female science undergraduates. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28(1-2), 128-142.
38. Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., Van Velsor, E., & Center for Creative Leadership. (1994). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? Perseus Books Group.
39. Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making technology masculine: Men, women and modern machines in America, 1870-1940. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
40. Oldenziel, R. (2000). Multiple-entry visas: Gender and engineering in the US, 1870-1945. In A. Canel, R. Oldenziel, & K. Zachmann (Eds.), Crossing borders, building bridges: Comparing the history of women engineers 1870s-1990s (pp. 11-49). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
41. Pawley, A. L. (2007). Drawing the line: Academic engineers negotiating the boundaries of engineering. PhD, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison.
42. Pawley, A. L. (2009). Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty describe engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 309-319.
43. Pawley, A. L. (In review). Engineering faculty drawing the line: A theory of boundaries in academic engineering. Engineering Studies.
44. Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social justice. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers.
45. Schön, D. A. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change (November/December), 27-34.
46. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47. Simmons, R. (2002). Smith Pickering engineering program philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.science.smith.edu/departments/Engin/philosophy.html.
48. Slaton, A. E. (2010). Race, rigor and selectivity in U.S. engineering: History of an occupational color-line. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Spanier, B. (2001). Your silence will not protect you: Feminist science studies, breast cancer, and activism. In M. Mayberry, B. Subramaniam, & L. H. Weasel (Eds.), Feminist science studies: A new generation (pp. 258-274). New York, NY: Routledge.
50. Stage, S. (1997a). Ellen Richards and the social significance of the home economics movement. In S. Stage & V. B. Vincenti (Eds.), Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession (pp. 17-33). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
51. Stage, S. (1997b). Introduction: Home economics, what's in a name? In S. Stage & V. B. Vincenti (Eds.), Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession (pp. 1-13). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
52. UNICEF. (2006). Progress for children: A report card on water and sanitation 5. UNICEF.
53. UNICEF Water Environment and Sanitation Section. (2005). Water, sanitation and hygiene education for schools. UNICEF/IRC.
54. Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
55. Watson, K., & Froyd, J. (2007). Diversifying the U.S. engineering workforce: A new model. Journal of Engineering Education (January), 19-32.
56. Wulf, W. A. (2007). Engineering education for the 21st century Retrieved from http://mediasite.engr.wisc.edu/Mediasite/Viewer/?peid= 0dcdd85ed38f40119b515c872aa131361d.
57. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.