Accuracy of glycated haemoglobin in screening for pre-diabetes in Asian Indians-a community survey: The Chandigarh Urban Diabetes Study (CUDS)

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1385-1389

  Bhansali, A ^a   Walia, R ^a   Ravi Kumar, P ^a   Ravi Kiran, M ^a   Shanmugasundar, G ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; INDIAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FASTING; FEMALE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; INDIA; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PREDIABETIC STATE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84867214130     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03634.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047-1053.
2. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type2 diabetes (UKPDS35): prospective observational study. Br Med J 2000; 321: 405-412.
3. WHO. Part1: Definition, Diagnosis, and Classification of Diabetes and its Complications. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/WHO_NCD_NCS_99.2.pdf. Last accessed 21 May 2011.
4. Cox ME, Edelman E. Tests for screening and diagnosis of type2 diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2009; 27: 132-138.
5. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: s62-69.
6. International Expert Committee. Report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1327-1334.
7. Lipska KJ, De Rekeneire N, Van Ness PH, Johnson KC, Kanaya A, Koster A et al.Identifying dysglycemic states in older adults: implications of the emerging use of hemoglobin A1c. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 5289-5295.
8. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Gregg E, Brancati FL, Coresh J. Performance of A1C for the classification and prediction of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 84-89.
9. Hu Y, Liu W, Chen Y, Zhang M, Wang L, Zhou H et al.Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. Acta Diabetol 2010; 47: 231-236.
10. 1c for detecting newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes in Chinese communities living in Beijing. Diabet Med 2009; 26: 1262-1268.
11. Mohan V, Vijayachandrika V, Gokulakrishnan K, Anjana RM, Ganesan A, Weber MB et al.A1C cut points to define various glucose intolerance groups in Asian Indians. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 515-519.
12. Lorenzo C, Wagenknecht LE, Hanley AJ, Rewers MJ, Karter AJ, Haffner SM. A1C between 5.7 and 6.4% as a marker for identifying pre-diabetes, insulin sensitivity and secretion, and cardiovascular risk factors: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS). Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 2104-2109.
13. 1c) be used to detect people with type2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation?Postgrad Med J 2010; 86: 656-662.
14. Olson DE, Rhee MK, Herrick K, Ziemer DC, Twombly JG, Phillips LS. Screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes with proposed A1C-based diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 2184-2189.
15. 1c as a diagnostic test: the ethnic conundrum. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010; 6: 589-593.
16. Szwergold BS, Beisswenger PJ. Enzymatic deglycation - a new paradigm or an epiphenomenon?. Biochem Soc T 2003; 31: 1428-1432.
17. Herman WH, Yong MA, Uwaifo G, Haffner S, Kahn SE, Horton ES et al.Differences in A1c by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Programe. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2453-2457.
18. Selvin E, Zhu H, Brancati FL. Elevated A1c in adults without a history of diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 820-833.
19. 1c in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabet Med 2009; 26: 1068-1069.
20. Likhari T, Gama R. Ethnic differences in glycated haemoglobin between white subjects and those of South Asian origin with normal glucose tolerance. J Clin Pathol 2010; 63: 278-280.
21. Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review13: receiver operating characteristic curves. Crit Care 2004; 8: 508-512.
22. Kumar PR, Bhansali A, Ravikiran M, Bhansali S, Dutta P, Thakur JS et al.Utility of glycated hemoglobin in diagnosing Type2 diabetes mellitus: a community-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 2832-2835.
23. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P et al.Prevention of type2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1343-1350.
24. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 393-403.
25. Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A, Laakso M. Acarbose for prevention of type2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2072-2077.
26. 1c as a screening tool for detection of type2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2007; 24: 333-343.
27. 1c in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 275-278.
28. Buell C, Kermah D, Davidson MB. Utility of A1C for diabetes screening in the 1999 2004 NHANES population. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2233-2235.
29. Nakagami T, Tominaga M, Nishimura R, Yoshiike N, Daimon M, Oizumi T et al.Is the measurement of glycated hemoglobin A1c alone an efficient screening test for undiagnosed diabetes? Japan National Diabetes Survey. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 76: 251-256.