The competitive ability of different chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes against Polygonum aviculare under field conditions

Crop Protection

Volumn 42, Issue , 2012, Pages 312-319

  Radicetti, Emanuele ^a   Mancinelli, Roberto ^a   Campiglia, Enio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Competition indices; Competitive ability; Cultural weed control; Weed density

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; CROP YIELD; GENOTYPE; GRASS; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; LEGUME; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; WEED CONTROL;

ITALY;

CICER ARIETINUM; POLYGONUM; POLYGONUM AVICULARE;

EID: 84867194702     PISSN: 02612194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Avola G., Patanè C. Variation among physical, chemical and technological properties in three Sicilian cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2010, 45:2565-2572.
2. Askew S.D., Wilcut J.W. Ladysthumb interference and seed production in cotton. Weed Sci. 2002, 50:326-332.
3. Askew S.D., Wilcut J.W. Tropic croton interference in cotton. Weed Sci. 2001, 49:184-189.
4. Bastiaans L., Paolini R., Baumann D.T. Focus on ecological weed management: what is hindering adoption?. Weed Res. 2008, 48:481-491.
5. Batlla D., Grundy A., Dent K.C., Clay H.A., Finch-Savage W.E. A quantitative analysis of temperature-dependent dormancy changes in Polygonum aviculare seeds. Weed Res. 2009, 49:428-438.
6. Batlla D., Nicoletta M., Benech-Arnold R. Sensivity of Polygonum aviculare to light as affected by soil moisture conditions. Ann. Bot.-London 2007, 99:1-10.
7. Christensen S. Weed suppression ability of spring barley varieties. Weed Res. 1995, 35:241-247.
8. Chikoye D., Weise S.F., Swanton C.J. Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolie) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 1995, 43:375-380.
9. Cici S.Z.H., Adkins S., Hanan J. A canopy architectural model to study the competitive ability of chickpea with sowthistle. Ann. Bot.-London 2008, 101:1311-1318.
10. Costea M., Tardif F.J. The biology of Canadian weeds. 131. Polygonum aviculare L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2005, 481-506.
11. Cousens R.D. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1985, 107:239-252.
12. Cousens R.D. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. J. Agric. Sci. 1985, 105:513-521.
13. Cousens R.D. Aspects of design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 1991, 5:664-673.
14. Datta A., Sindel B.M., Kristiansen P., Jessop R.S., Felton W.L. Effect of isoxaflutole on the growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop Prot. 2009, 28:923-927.
15. Froud-Williams R.J., Chancellor R.J., Drennan D.S.H. The effects of seed burial and soil disturbance on emergence and survival of arable weeds in relation to minimal cultivation. J. Appl. Ecol. 1984, 21:629-641.
16. Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research 1984, Jhon & son, New York, USA. second ed.
17. Hooper D.U. The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 1998, 79:704-719.
18. Jannink J.L., Orf J.H., Jordan N.R., Shaw R.G. Index selection for weed suppressive ability in soybean. Crop Sci. 2000, 40:1087-1094.
19. Lemerle D., Verbeek B., Orchard B. Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum. Weed Res. 2001, 41:197-209.
20. McDonald G.K., Hollaway K.L., McMurray L. Increasing plant density improves weed competition in lentil (Lens culinaris). Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 2007, 47:48-56.
21. Meets P., Garnier E. Variation in relative growth rate and its components in the annual Polygonum aviculare in relation to habitat disturbance and seed size. Oecologia 1996, 108:438-445.
22. Mohammadi G., Javanshir A., Khooie F.R., Mohammadi S.A., Zehtab Salmasi S. Critical period of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Res. 2005, 45:57-63.
23. Mohammadi G.R. Growth parameters enhancing the competitive ability of corn (Zea mays L.) against weeds. Weed Biol. Manag. 2007, 7:232-236.
24. Odero D.C., Mesbah A.O., Miller S.D., Kniss A.R. Lanceleaf sage (Salvia reflexa) interference in sugarbeet. Weed Technol. 2010, 24:557-561.
25. Oweis T., Hachum A., Pala M. Water use efficiency of winter-sown chickpea under supplemental irrigation in Mediterranean environment. Agr. Water Manage. 2004, 66:163-179.
26. Pala M., Ryan J., Zhang H., Singh M., Harris H.C. Water-use efficiency of wheat-based rotation systems in a Mediterranean environment. Agr. Water Manage. 2007, 93:136-144.
27. Paolini R., Del Puglia S., Principi M., Barcellona O., Riccardi E. Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and soling time. Weed Res. 1998, 38:247-255.
28. Paolini R., Faustini F., Saccardo F., Crinò P. Competitive interactions between chick-pea genotypes and weeds. Weed Res. 2006, 46:335-344.
29. Radicetti E., Mancinelli R., Campiglia E. Combined effect of genotype and inter-row tillage on yield and weed control of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a rainfed Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res. 2012, 127:161-169.
30. Saccardo F., Campiglia E., Mancinelli R., Crinò P., Vitale P. Winter and spring sowing of the Italian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) crop. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 2000, 533:259-266.
31. Safahani Langeroudi A.R., Kamkar B. Field screening of canola (Brassica napus) cultivars against wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) using competition indices and some empirical yield loss models in Golestan Province, Iran. Crop Prot. 2009, 28:577-582.
32. SAS SAS User's Guide: Statistics 1996, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
33. Sheibany K., Baghestani M.A., Atri A. Competitive effects of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) on the growth indices and yield of corn. Weed Biol. Manag. 2009, 9:152-159.
34. Snaydon R.W. Replacement or additive designs for competition studies?. J. Appl. Ecol. 1991, 28:930-946.
35. Verdù A.M.C., Mas M.T. Comparison of Polygonum aviculare L. seedling survival under different tillage systems in Mediterranean dryland agroecosystems. Acta Oecol. 2004, 25:119-127.
36. Weigelt A., Jolliffe P. Indices of plant competition. J. Ecol. 2003, 91:707-720.
37. Whish J.P.M., Sindel B.M., Jessop R.S., Felton W.L. The effect of row spacing and weed density on yield loss of chickpea. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2002, 53:1335-1340.
38. Wilson J.B. Shot competition and root competition. J. Appl. Ecol. 1988, 25:279-296.
39. Wiens M.J., Entz M.H., Martin R.C., Hammermeister A.M. Agronomic benefits of alfalfa mulch applied to organically managed spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2005, 86:121-131.
40. Zimdhal R.L. Weed-Crop Competition 2004, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. second ed.