Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: Prioritizing sources of uncertainty

Water Research

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 639-651

  Sin, Gürkan ^a   Gernaey, Krist V ^a   Neumann, Marc B ^b,c   van Loosdrecht, Mark C M ^d   Gujer, Willi ^b,e  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^e ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

BSM1; Design; Influent fractions; Plant performance; Sensitivity; Uncertainty; Wastewater treatment; WWTP

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; EFFLUENTS; ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; RECLAMATION; SEWAGE PUMPING PLANTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

BSM1; INFLUENT FRACTIONS; PLANT PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY; UNCERTAINTY; WWTP;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AMMONIA;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; ASH; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENERGY; ENGINEERING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SLUDGE; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

EID: 78650416295     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abusam A., Keesman K. Sensitivity analysis of the secondary settling tank double-exponential function model. European Water Management Journal. 2002, 2002-2007.
2. Brun R., Kuhni M., Siegrist H., Gujer W., Reichert P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters - systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets. Water Res. 2002, 36:4113-4127.
3. Campolongo F., Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: an application of different analysis methods. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1997, 57:49-69.
4. Copp J.B. The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual 2002, Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg.
5. Chu K.H., van Veldhulzen H.M., van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Respirometric measurement of kinetic parameters: effect of activated sludge floc size. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48(8):61-68.
6. Flores-Alsina X., Rodríguez-Roda I., Sin G., Gernaey K.V. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty. Water Res. 2008, 42:4485-4497.
7. Flores-Alsina X., Rodríguez-Roda I., Sin G., Gernaey K.V. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of control strategies using the Benchmark Simulation Model No1 (BSM1). Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(3):491-499.
8. Helton J.C. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive-waste disposal. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1993, 42(2-3):327-367.
9. Helton J.C., Davis F.J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2003, 81:23-69.
10. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 2000, IWA Scientific and Technical Report 9, IWA Publishing, London.
11. Holmberg A. On the practical identifiability of microbial growth models incorporating Michaelis-Menten type nonlinearities. Math. Biosci. 1982, 62:23-43.
12. Hulsbeek J.J.W., Kruit J., Roeleveld P.J., van Loosdrecht M.C.M. A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45(6):127-136.
13. Iman L.R., Conover W.J. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Commun. Statist.-Simula. Computa. 1982, 11:311-334.
14. McKay M.D., Morrison J.D., Upton S.C. Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1999, 117:44-51.
15. Morris M.D. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 1991, 33:161-174.
16. Neumann M.B., Gujer W., von Gunten U. Global sensitivity analysis for model-based prediction of oxidative micropollutant transformation during drinking water treatment. Water Res. 2009, 43:997-1004.
17. Refsgaard J.C., van der Sluijs J.P., Højberg A.L., Vanrolleghem P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - a framework and guidance. Environ. Modell. Soft. 2007, 22:1543-1556.
18. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Tarantola S., Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis practices: strategies for model-based inference. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2006, 91:1109-1125.
19. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Saisana M., Tarantola S. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The primer 2008, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
20. Sin G., Gernaey K.V., Neumann M.B., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Gujer W. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design. Water Res. 2009, 43:2894-2906.
21. Sin G., Van Hulle S.W.H., De Pauw D.J.W., van Griensven A., Vanrolleghem P.A. A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: a SWOT analysis. Water Res. 2005, 39:2459-2474.
22. Takács I., Patry G.G., Nolasco D. A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process. Water Res. 1991, 25(10):1263-1271.
23. Van Veldhuizen H.M., Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Heijnen J.J. Modelling biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a full scale activated sludge process. Water Res. 1999, 33:3459-3468.
24. Walker W.E., Harremoes P., Rotmans J., Van der Sluijs J.P., Van Asselt M.B.A., Janssen P., Krayer von Krauss M.P. Defining uncertainty a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr. Assess. 2003, 4(1):5-17.
25. Weijers S.R., Vanrolleghem P.A. A procedure for selecting best identifiable parameters in calibrating activated sludge model no. 1 to full-scale plant data. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 36(5):69-79.