Regularity extraction from non-adjacent sounds

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue MAY, 2012, Pages

  Bendixen, Alexandra ^a,b   Schröger, Erich ^a   Ritter, Walter ^c   Winkler, István ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^c NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Auditory object formation; Auditory processing; Implicit learning; Integration; Mismatch negativity (MMN); Non adjacent dependencies; Segregation; Sound grouping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867131134     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00143     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Andreou, L.-V., Kashino, M., and Chait, M. (2011). The role of temporal regularity in auditory segregation. Hear. Res. 280, 228-235.
2. Bee, M. A., and Klump, G. M. (2005). Auditory stream segregation in the songbird forebrain: effects of time intervals on responses to interleaved tone sequences. Brain. Behav. Evol. 66, 197-214.
3. Bendixen, A., Bohm, T. M., Szalárdy, O., Mill, R., Denham, S. L., and Winkler, I. (in press). Different roles of similarity and predictability in auditory stream segregation. Learn. Percept.
4. Bendixen, A., Denham, S. L., Gyimesi, K., and Winkler, I. (2010). Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 3658-3666.
5. Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., and Schröger, E. (2008). Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage 41, 1111-1119.
6. Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., and Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 1664-1677.
7. Bendixen, A., and Schröger, E. (2008). Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts. Biol. Psychol. 78, 231-241.
8. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bregman, A. S., Ahad, P. A., Crum, P. A., and O'Reilly, J. (2000). Effects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory stream segregation. Percept. Psychophys. 62, 626-636.
10. Conway, C. M., Pisoni, D. B., and Kronenberger, W. G. (2009). The importance of sound for cognitive sequencing abilities: the auditory scaffolding hypothesis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18, 275-279.
11. Costa-Faidella, J., Grimm, S., Slabu, L., Díaz-Santaella, F., and Escera, C. (2011). Multiple time scales of adaptation in the auditory system as revealed by human evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 48, 774-783.
12. Creel, S. C., Newport, E. L., and Aslin, R. N. (2004). Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30, 1119-1130.
13. Delorme, A., and Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9-21.
14. Denham, S. L., and Winkler, I. (2006). The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. J. Physiol. Paris 100, 154-170.
15. Dowling, W. J., Lung, K. M.-T., and Herrbold, S. (1987). Aiming attention in pitch and time in the perception of interleaved melodies. Percept. Psychophys. 41, 642-656.
16. Furl, N., Kumar, S., Alter, K., Durrant, S., Shawe-Taylor, J., and Griffiths, T. D. (2011). Neural prediction of higherorder auditory sequence statistics. Neuroimage 54, 2267-2277.
17. Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
18. Greenhouse, S. W., and Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24, 95-112.
19. Grimm, S., Widmann, A., and Schröger, E. (2004). Differential processing of duration changes within short and long sounds in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 356, 83-86.
20. Haenschel, C., Vernon, D. J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J. H., and Baldeweg, T. (2005). Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. J. Neurosci. 25, 10494-10501.
21. Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Jacobsen, T., Maess, B., Schröger, E., and Winkler, I. (2008a). MMN or no MMN: no magnitude of deviance effect on the MMN amplitude. Psychophysiology 45, 60-69.
22. Horváth, J., Winkler, I., and Bendixen, A. (2008b). Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction? Biol. Psychol. 79, 139-147.
23. Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Sussman, E., and Winkler, I. (2001). Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 12, 131-144.
24. Horváth, J., Roeber, U., and Schröger, E. (2009). The utility of brief, spectrally rich, dynamic sounds in the passive oddball paradigm. Neurosci. Lett. 461, 262-265.
25. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 10, 371-375.
26. Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychol. Rev. 83, 323-355.
27. Jones, M. R., and Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol. Rev. 96, 459-491.
28. Jones, M. R., Kidd, G., and Wetzel, R. (1981). Evidence for rhythmic attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 7, 1059-1073.
29. Kaernbach, C., and Demany, L. (1998). Psychophysical evidence against the autocorrelation theory of auditory temporal processing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2298-2306.
30. Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., and Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations. Biol. Psychol. 74, 1-19.
31. Macmillan, N. A., and Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. May, P. J. C., and Tiitinen, H. (2010). Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47, 66-122.
33. Moore, B. C. J., and Gockel, H. (2002). Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acust. United Acust. 88, 320-333.
34. Müller, D., Widmann, A., and Schröger, E. (2005). Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. Psychophysiology 42, 668-676.
35. Näätänen, R., Astikainen, P., Ruusuvirta, T., and Huotilainen, M. (2010). Automatic auditory intelligence: an expression of the sensory-cognitive core of cognitive processes. Brain Res. Rev. 64, 123-136.
36. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., and Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selectiveattention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 42, 313-329.
37. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., and Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 2544-2590.
38. Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., and Winkler, I. (2001). "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci. 24, 283-288.
39. Neuhoff, J. G. (2003). Pitch variation is unnecessary and sometimes insufficient for the formation of auditory objects. Cognition 87, 219-224.
40. Nousak, J. M. K., Deacon, D., Ritter, W., and Vaughan, H. G. Jr. (1996). Storage of information in transient auditory memory. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 4, 305-317.
41. Novak, G. P., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., and Wiznitzer, M. L. (1990). Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75, 255-275.
42. Paavilainen, P., Arajärvi, P., and Takegata, R. (2007). Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. Neuroreport 18, 159-163.
43. Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., and Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology 38, 359-365.
44. Pacton, S., and Perruchet, P. (2008). An attention-based associative account of adjacent and nonadjacent dependency learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34, 80-96.
45. Pressnitzer, D., Sayles, M., Micheyl, C., and Winter, I. M. (2008). Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Curr. Biol. 18, 1124-1128.
46. Rahne, T., Böckmann, M., Von Specht, H., and Sussman, E. S. (2007). Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis. Brain Res. 1144, 127-135.
47. Rahne, T., and Böckmann-Barthel, M. (2009). Visual cues release the temporal coherence of auditory objects in auditory scene analysis. Brain Res. 1300, 125-134.
48. Rahne, T., and Sussman, E. (2009). Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29, 205-211.
49. Remillard, G. (2009). Pure perceptualbased sequence learning: a role for visuospatial attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 35, 528-541.
50. Rimmele, J. M., Schröger, E., and Bendixen, A. (in press). Age-related changes in the use of regular patterns for stream segregation. Hear. Res.
51. Ritter, W., Sussman, E., and Molholm, S. (2000). Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects. Neuroreport 11, 61-63.
52. Roberts, B., Glasberg, B. R., and Moore, B. C. J. (2002). Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2074-2085.
53. Saarinen, J., Paavilainen, P., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., and Näätänen, R. (1992). Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. Neuroreport 3, 1149-1151.
54. Sams, M., Alho, K., and Näätänen, R. (1984). Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatchnegativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 21, 434-441.
55. Schröger, E. (2005). The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acust. United Acust. 91, 490-501.
56. Schröger, E. (2007). Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. J. Psychophysiol. 21, 138-146.
57. Shinozaki, N., Yabe, H., Sato, Y., Sutoh, T., Hiruma, T., Nashida, T., and Kaneko, S. (2000). Mismatch negativity (MMN) reveals sound grouping in the human brain. Neuroreport 11, 1597-1601.
58. Snodgrass, J. G., and Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117, 34-50.
59. Stanislaw, H., and Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 31, 137-149.
60. Sussman, E., Ritter, W., and Vaughan, H. G. Jr. (1998). Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Res. 789, 130-138.
61. Sussman, E., Ritter, W., and Vaughan, H. G. Jr. (1999). An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 36, 22-34.
62. Sussman, E., and Steinschneider, M. (2006). Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex. Brain Res. 1075, 165-174.
63. Sussman, E., and Steinschneider, M. (2009). Attention effects on auditory scene analysis in children. Neuropsychologia 47, 771-785.
64. Sussman, E., and Winkler, I. (2001). Dynamic sensory updating in the auditory system. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 12, 431-439.
65. Sussman, E., Čeponiene, R., Shestakova, A., Näätänen, R., and Winkler, I. (2001). Auditory stream segregation processes operate similarly in school-aged children and adults. Hear. Res. 153, 108-114.
66. Sussman, E. S. (2005). Integration and segregation in auditory scene analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1285-1298.
67. Sussman, E. S., Horváth, J., Winkler, I., and Orr, M. (2007). The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 136-152.
68. Takegata, R., Brattico, E., Tervaniemi, M., Varyagina, O., Näätänen, R., and Winkler, I. (2005). Preattentive representation of feature conjunctions for concurrent spatially distributed auditory objects. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 169-179.
69. Timm, J., Weise, A., Grimm, S., and Schröger, E. (2011). An asymmetry in the automatic detection of the presence or absence of a frequency modulation within a tone: a mismatch negativity study. Front. Psychol. 2:189. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00189.
70. van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975). Temporal Coherence in the Perception of Tone Sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven.
71. van Zuijen, T. L., Simoens, V. L., Paavilainen, P., Näätänen, R., and Tervaniemi, M. (2006). Implicit, intuitive, and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: an event-related brain potential study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1292-1303.
72. Vliegen, J., and Oxenham, A. J. (1999). Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 339-346.
73. Walker, L. J., Carpenter, M., Downs, C. R., Cranford, J. L., Stuart, A., and Pravica, D. (2001). Possible neuronal refractory or recovery artifacts associated with recording the mismatch negativity response. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 12, 348-356.
74. Weise, A., Grimm, S., Müller, D., and Schröger, E. (2010). A temporal constraint for automatic deviance detection and object formation: a mismatch negativity study. Brain Res. 1331, 88-95.
75. Weise, A., Müller, D., Grimm, S., Rübsamen, R., and Schröger, E. (2007). Differential processing of terminal tone parts within structured and non-structured tones. Neurosci. Lett. 421, 163-167.
76. Winkler, I. (1996). "Necessary and sufficient conditions for the elicitation of the mismatch negativity," in Recent Advances in Event-Related Brain Potentials Research. Proceedings of the XIth International Conference on Event-Related Brain Potentials (EPIC), Okinawa, Japan, June 25-30, 1995, eds C. Ogura, Y. Koga, and M. Shimokochi (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 36-43.
77. Winkler, I. (2003). "Change detection in complex auditory environment: Beyond the oddball paradigm," in Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings, ed.J. Polich (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 61-81.
78. Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J. Psychophysiol. 21, 147-163.
79. Winkler, I., and Czigler, I. (1998). Mismatch negativity: deviance detection or the maintenance of the "standard". Neuroreport 9, 3809-3813.
80. Winkler, I., Czigler, I., Jaramillo, M., Paavilainen, P., and Näätänen, R. (1998). Temporal constraints of auditory event synthesis: evidence from ERPs. Neuroreport 9, 495-499.
81. Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., Mill, R., Böhm, T. M., and Bendixen, A. (2012). Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 1001-1012.
82. Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., and Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 532-540.
83. Winkler, I., Kushnerenko, E., Horváth, J., Čeponiene, R., Fellman, V., Huotilainen, M., Näätänen, R., and Sussman, E. (2003a). Newborn infants can organize the auditory world. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 11812-11815.
84. Winkler, I., Sussman, E., Tervaniemi, M., Horváth, J., Ritter, W., and Näätänen, R. (2003b). Preattentive auditory context effects. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 3, 57-77.
85. Yabe, H., Tervaniemi, M., Reinikainen, K., and Näätänen, R. (1997). Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission. Neuroreport 8, 1971-1974.
86. Yabe, H., Tervaniemi, M., Sinkkonen, J., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R. J., and Näätänen, R. (1998). Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain. Psychophysiology 35, 615-619.
87. Zachau, S., Rinker, T., Körner, B., Kohls, G., Maas, V., Hennighausen, K., and Schecker, M. (2005). Extracting rules: early and late mismatch negativity to tone patterns. Neuroreport 16, 2015-2019.