The role of image understanding in contour detection

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 622-629

  Zitnick, C Lawrence ^a   Parikh, Devi ^b  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTOUR DETECTION; DETECTING OBJECTS; HIGH-LEVEL INFORMATION; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN STUDY; IMAGE GRADIENTS; LOW-LEVEL CUES; MACHINE ALGORITHM; MID-LEVEL CUE; OVER CURRENT; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84867129630     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247729     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. P. Arbelaez, M. Maire, C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. PAMI, 33(5):898 -916, 2011. 2, 3, 7
2. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. PAMI, 24(4), 2002. 1, 2
3. J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. PAMI, 8(6), 1986. 1, 3
4. M. J. Choi, J. Lim, A. Torralba, and A. Willsky. Exploiting hierarchical context on a large database of object categories. In CVPR, 2010. 4
5. D. Comaniciu and P. Meer. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. PAMI, 24(5), 2002. 3, 7
6. P. Dollár, Z. Tu, and S. Belongie. Supervised learning of edges and object boundaries. In CVPR, June 2006. 1
7. J. Driver and R. S. Frackowiak. Neurobiological measures of human selective attention. Neuropsychologia, 39(12):1257-1262, 2001. 2
8. J. Elder and S. Zucker. Computing contour closure. In ECCV. 1996. 1, 3
9. P. F. Felzenszwalb and D. P. Huttenlocher. Efficient graph-based image segmentation. IJCV, 59(2), 2004. 3, 7
10. V. Ferrari, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool. Simultaneous object recognition and segmentation by image exploration. In ECCV. 2004. 1, 2, 8
11. C. C. Fowlkes. Measuring the ecological validity of grouping and figure-ground cues. Thesis, 2005. 2
12. C. C. Fowlkes, D. R. Martin, and J. Malik. Local figure-ground cues are valid for natural images. Journal of Vision, 7(8), 2007. 1, 2
13. L. Grady, M.-P. Jolly, and A. Seitz. Segmentation from a box. In ICCV, 2011. 2
14. G. W. Hartmann. Principles of gestalt psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20:623-628, 1936. 1
15. D. Hoiem, A. Efros, and M. Hebert. Putting objects in perspective. In CVPR, 2006. 1
16. Y. J. Lee and K. Grauman. Collect-cut: Segmentation with top-down cues discovered in multi-object images. In CVPR, 2010. 1, 2
17. D. R. Martin, C. C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues. PAMI, 26:530-549, 2004. 1, 2, 4
18. J. McDermott. Psychophysics with junctions in real images. Perception, 33:1101-1127, 2004. 2
19. P. Parent and S. Zucker. Trace inference, curvature consistency, and curve detection. PAMI, 11(8):823 -839, 1989. 1
20. D. Parikh. Recognizing jumbled images: the role of local and global information in image classification. In ICCV, 2011. 2
21. D. Parikh and C. Zitnick. The role of features, algorithms and data in visual recognition. In CVPR, 2010. 2
22. D. Parikh and C. Zitnick. Finding the weakest link in person detectors. In CVPR, 2011. 2
23. D. Parikh, C. Zitnick, and T. Chen. From appearance to context-based recognition: Dense labeling in small images. In CVPR, 2008. 2
24. M. Peterson. Object recognition processes can and do operate before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 1994. 2
25. A. Rabinovich, A. Vedaldi, C. Galleguillos, E. Wiewiora, and S. Belongie. Objects in context. ICCV, 2007. 1, 2
26. J. Rivest and P. Cabanagh. Localizing contours defined by more than one attribute. Vision Research, 36(1):53 - 66, 1996. 2
27. C. Rother, V. Kolmogorov, and A. Blake. "grabcut": interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. In SIGGRAPH, 2004. 1
28. J. Shi and J. Malik. Normalized cuts and image segmentation. PAMI, 22(8), 2000. 3
29. J. Shotton, J. Winn, C. Rother, and A. Criminisi. Texton-boost: Joint appearance, shape and context modeling for multi-class object recognition and segmentation. In ECCV. 2006. 1, 2, 8
30. J. Sivic, B. Russell, A. Efros, A. Zisserman, andW. Freeman. Discovering objects and their location in images. In ICCV, 2005. 2
31. H. Tao, H. Sawhney, and R. Kumar. A global matching framework for stereo computation. In ICCV, 2001. 1
32. A. Torralba, R. Fergus, and W. Freeman. 80 million tiny images: A large data set for nonparametric object and scene recognition. PAMI, 30(11), 2008. 2
33. Z. Tu, X. Chen, A. L. Yuille, and S.-C. Zhu. Image parsing: Unifying segmentation, detection, and recognition. IJCV, 63:113-140, 2005. 1, 2, 8
34. R. von der Heydt, E. Peterhans, and G. Baumgartner. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science, 224(4654), 1984. 1
35. J. Wang and E. Adelson. Representing moving images with layers. TIP, 3(5), 1994. 1
36. L. R. Williams and D. W. Jacobs. Stochastic completion fields: a neural model of illusory contour shape and salience. Neural Comput., 9:837-858, 1997. 1
37. J. Winn and N. Jojic. Locus: learning object classes with unsupervised segmentation. In ICCV, 2005. 1
38. A. Yoonessi and C. L. Baker. Contribution of motion parallax to segmentation and depth perception. Journal of Vision, 11(9), 2011. 2