Effects of delayed visual feedback on Grooved Pegboard test performance

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue MAR, 2012, Pages

  Fujisaki, Waka ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Critical interval; Delayed auditory feedback; Delayed visual feedback; Spatial disparity; Temporal disparity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867116415     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00061     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adelstein, B. D., Begault, D. R., Anderson, M. R., and Wenzel, E. M. (2003). "Sensitivity to haptic-audio Asynchrony," in The Fifth International Conference on Multimodal Interface (Vancouver: Vancouver), 73-76.
2. Black, J. W. (1951). The effect of delayed side-tone upon vocal rate and intensity. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 16, 56-60.
3. Blakemore, S. J., Frith, C. D., and Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatiotemporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 551-559.
4. Botvinick, M., and Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756.
5. Bryden, P. J., and Roy, E. A. (2005). A new method of administering the Grooved Pegboard Test: performance as a function of handedness and sex. Brain Cogn. 58, 258-268.
6. Butler, R. A., and Galloway, F. T. (1957). Factoral analysis of the delayed speech feedback phenomenon. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 632-635.
7. Cunningham, D. W., Billock, V. A., and Tsou, B. H. (2001). Sensorimotor adaptation to violations of temporal contiguity. Psychol. Sci. 12, 532-535.
8. Dabrowski, J. R., and Munson, E. V. (2001). "Is 100 milliseconds too fast?" in The CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle: Seattle), 317-318.
9. Di Luca, M., Machulla, T. K., and Ernst, M. O. (2009). Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency. J. Vis. 9(12):7, 1-16.
10. Fairbanks, G., and Guttman, N. (1958). Effects of delayed auditory feedback upon articulation. J. Speech Hear. Res. 1, 12-22.
11. Finney, S. A., and Warren, W. H. (2002). Delayed auditory feedback and rhythmic tapping: evidence for a critical interval shift. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 896-908.
12. Fujisaki, W., and Nishida, S. (2010). A common perceptual temporal limit of binding synchronous inputs across different sensory attributes and modalities. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 2281-2290.
13. Fujisaki, W., Shimojo, S., Kashino, M., and Nishida, S. (2004). Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 773-778.
14. Gates, A., Bradshaw, J. L., and Nettleto, N. C. (1974). Effect of different delayed auditory-feedback intervals on a music performance task. Percept. Psychophys. 15, 21-25.
15. Hanson, J. V. M., Heron, J., and Whitaker, D. (2008). Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities. Exp. Brain Res. 185, 347-352.
16. Harrar, V., and Harris, L. R. (2005). Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision. Exp. Brain Res. 166, 465-473.
17. Harrar, V., and Harris, L. R. (2008). The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity. Exp. Brain Res. 186, 517-524.
18. Heron, J., Hanson, J. V., and Whitaker, D. (2009). Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing. PLoS ONE 4, e7681. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007681.
19. Howell, P., Powell, D. J., and Khan, L. (1983). Amplitude contour of the delayed signal and interference in delayed auditory feedback tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 9, 772-784.
20. Kalmus, H., Denes, P., and Fry, D. B. (1955). Effect of delayed acoustic feed-back on some non-vocal activities. Nature 175, 1078.
21. Keetels, M., and Vroomen, J. (2008). Temporal recalibration to tactile-visual asynchronous stimuli. Neurosci. Lett. 430, 130-134.
22. Kitazawa, S., Kohno, T., and Uka, T. (1995). Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human. J. Neurosci. 15, 7644-7652.
23. Lee, B. S. (1950). Effects of delayed speech feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22, 824-826.
24. Mackay, D. G. (1968). Metamorphosis of a critical interval - age-linked changes in delay in auditory feedback that produces maximal disruption of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43, 811.
25. Metcalf, C., Adams, J., Burridge, J., Yule, V., and Chappell, P. (2007). A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF. Musculoskeletal Care 5, 160-173.
26. Miall, R. C., Weir, D. J., and Stein, J. F. (1985). Visuomotor tracking with delayed visual feedback. Neuroscience 16, 511-520.
27. Navarra, J., Hartcher-O'Brien, J., Piazza, E., and Spence, C. (2009). Adaptation to audiovisual asynchrony modulates the speeded detection of sound. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 9169-9173.
28. Navarra, J., Vatakis, A., Zampini, M., Soto-Faraco, S., Humphreys, W., and Spence, C. (2005). Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 499-507.
29. Okamoto, S., Konyo, M., Saga, S., and Tadokoro, S. (2009). Detectability and perceptual consequences of delayed feedback in a vibrotactile texture display. IEEE Trans. Haptics 2, 73-84.
30. Pfordresher, P. Q., and Benitez, B. (2007). Temporal coordination between actions and sound during sequence production. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26, 742-756.
31. Roseboom, W., and Arnold, D. H. (2011). Twice upon a time: multiple concurrent temporal recalibrations of audiovisual speech. Psychol. Sci. 22, 872-877.
32. Shimada, S., Fukuda, K., and Hiraki, K. (2009). Rubber hand illusion.
33. Siegel, G. M., Fehst, C. A., Garber, S. R., and Pick, H. L. Jr. (1980). Delayed auditory feedback with children. J. Speech Hear. Res. 23, 802-813.
34. Smith, K. U., and Sussman, H. M. (1970). Delayed feedback in steering during learning and transfer of learning. J. Appl. Psychol. 54, 334-342.
35. Smith, W. M., McCrary, J. W., and Smith, K. U. (1960). Delayed visual feedback and behavior. Science 132, 1013-1014.
36. Stetson, C., Cui, X., Montague, P. R., and Eagleman, D. M. (2006).
37. Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron 51, 651-659.
38. Sugano, Y., Keetels, M., and Vroomen, J. (2010). Adaptation to motor-visual and motor-auditory temporal lags transfer across modalities. Exp. Brain Res. 201, 393-399.
39. Takahashi, K., Saiki, J., and Watanabe, K. (2008). Realignment of temporal simultaneity between vision and touch. Neuroreport 19, 319-322.
40. Tanaka, H., Homma, K., and Imamizu, H. (2011). Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation. Exp. Brain Res. 208, 257-268.
41. Vatakis, A., Navarra, J., Soto-Faraco, S., and Spence, C. (2008). Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments. Exp. Brain Res. 185, 521-529.
42. Vroomen, J., Keetels, M., de Gelder, B., and Bertelson, P. (2004). Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Cogn. Brain Res. 22, 32-35.