The eco-evolutionary responses of a generalist consumer to resource competition

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 3130-3143

  Abrams, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Character displacement; Competition; Consumer resource system; Divergence; Trade off

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DIVERGENCE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; POPULATION DENSITY; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; POPULATION DENSITY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY;

EID: 84867102894     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01659.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1983. Life history strategies of optimal foragers. Theor. Popul. Biol. 24:22-38.
2. Abrams P.A. 1986. Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29:107-160.
3. Abrams P.A.. 1987a. Alternative models of character displacement: I. Displacement when there is competition for nutritionally essential resources. Evolution 41:651-661.
4. Abrams P.A.. 1987b. On classifying interactions between populations. Oecologia 73:272-281.
5. Abrams P.A.. 1990. Adaptive responses of generalist herbivores to competition: convergence or divergence. Evol. Ecol. 4:103-114.
6. Abrams P.A.. 1995. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. Am. Nat. 146:112-134.
7. Abrams P.A.. 1996. Evolution and the consequences of species introductions and deletions. Ecology 77:1321-1328.
8. Abrams P.A.. 1999. The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. Am. Nat. 153:83-97.
9. Abrams P.A.. 2000. Character shifts of species that share predators. Am. Nat. 156:S45-S61.
10. Abrams P.A.. 2006a. The prerequisites for and likelihood of generalist-specialist coexistence. Am. Nat. 167:329-342.
11. Abrams P.A.. 2006b. Evolution of resource-exploitation traits in a generalist consumer; the evolution and coexistence of generalists and specialists. Evolution. 60:427-439.
12. Abrams P.A.. 2006c. The effects of switching behavior on the evolutionary diversification of generalist consumers. Am. Nat. 168:645-659.
13. Abrams P.A.. 2010. Quantitative descriptions of resource choice in ecological models. Pop. Ecol. 52:47-58.
14. Abrams, P. A., and Matsuda, H. 1993. Effects of adaptive predatory and anti-predator behavior in a two prey-one predator system. Evol. Ecol 7:312-326.
15. Abrams P.A. 2004. Consequences of behavioral dynamics for the population dynamics of predator-prey systems with switching. Pop. Ecol. 46:13-25.
16. Abrams P.A.. 2005. The effect of adaptive change in the prey on the dynamics of an exploited predator population. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62:758-766.
17. Abrams, P. A., and L. Shen 1989. Population dynamics of systems with consumers that maintain a constant ratio of intake rates of two resources. Theor. Popul. Biol. 35:51-89.
18. Abrams, P. A., Matsuda, H., and Harada, Y. 1993. Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima in the evolution of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7:465-487.
19. Bolnick, D. I. 2004. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in a natural population of sticklebacks. Evolution 58:608-618.
20. Bürger, R. A. 2005. Multilocus analysis of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a quantitative trait. J. Math. Biol. 50:355-396.
21. de Mazancourt, C., and U. Dieckmann 2004. Trade-off geometries and frequency-dependent selection. Am. Nat. 164:765-778.
22. de Mazancourt, C., M. Loreau, and U. Dieckmann 2005. Understanding mutualism when there is adaptation to the partner. J. Ecol. 93:305-314.
23. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
24. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 156:S77-S101.
25. Egas, M., U. Dieckmann, and M. W. Sabelis 2004. Evolution restricts the coexistence of specialists and generalists; the role of trade-off structure. Am. Nat. 163:518-531.
26. Egas, M., M. W. Sabelis, and U. Dieckmann 2005. The evolution of specialization and ecological character displacement of herbivores along a gradient of plant quality. Evolution 59:507-520.
27. Fox, J. A., and D. A. Vassuer 2008. Character convergence under competition for nutritionally essential resources. Am. Nat. 172:667-680.
28. Geritz, S. A. H., É. Kisdi, G. Meszéna, and J. A. J. Metz 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive dynamics and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:35-57.
29. Gilpin, M. E., and F. Ayala 1973. Global models of growth and competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:3590-3593.
30. Holt, R. D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 12:197-229.
31. Holt R.D.. 1997. Community modules. Pp. 333-349 in A. C. Gange and V. K. Brown, eds. Multitrophic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems; 36th Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
32. Iwasa, Y., A. Pomiankowski, and S. Nee 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences; II. The 'handicap' principle. Evolution 45:1431-1442.
33. Lawlor, L. R., and J. Maynard Smith 1976. The coevolution and stability of competing species. Am. Nat. 110:79-99.
34. Lundberg, S., and N. C. Stenseth 1985. Coevolution of competing species: ecological character displacement. Theor. Popul. Biol. 27:105-119.
35. Ma, J., and S. A. Levin 2006. The evolution of resource adaptation: how generalist and specialist consumers evolve. Bull. Math. Biol. 68:1111-1123.
36. Matessi, C., and M. Gatto 1984. Does K-selection imply prudent predation? Theor. Popul. Biol. 25:347-363.
37. Matsuda, H., and P. A. Abrams 1994. Runaway evolution to self-extinction under asymmetrical competition. Evolution 48:1764-1772.
38. Mylius, S., and O. Diekmann 1995. On evolutionarily stable life histories, optimization and the need to be specific about density dependence. Oikos 74:218-224.
39. Preisser, E. L., D. I. Bolnick, and J. H. Grabowski 2009. Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey. Ecol. Lett. 12:315-323.
40. Rueffler, C., T. van Dooren, and J. A. J. Metz 2004. Adaptive walks on changing landscapes; Levins' approach extended. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65:165-178.
41. Rueffler, C., T. van Dooren, and J. A. J. Metz. 2006a. The evolution of resource specialization through frequency-dependent and frequency-independent mechanisms. Am. Nat. 167:81-93.
42. Rueffler, C., T. J. M. van Dooren, O. Leimar, and P. A. Abrams 2006b. Disruptive selection; and then what? TREE 21:238-245.
43. Schoener, T. W. 2011. The newest synthesis: Understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331:426-429.
44. Schreiber, S. J., and G. A. Tobiason 2003. The evolution of resource use. J. Math. Biol. 47:56-78.
45. Schreiber, S. J., R. Bürger, and D. I. Bolnick 2011. The community effects of phenotypic and genetic variation within a predator population. Ecology 92:1582-1593.
46. Werner, E. E., and S. D. Peacor 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083-1100.