Students' understanding of the general notion of a function of two variables

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 365-384

  Martínez Planell, Rafael ^a   Trigueros Gaisman, María ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

^b INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AUTÓNOMO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

APOS; Representations; Schema; Semiotic representation theory; Two variable function

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867096292     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-012-9408-8     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Artigue, M. (1992). Functions from an algebraic and graphical point of view: Cognitive difficulties and teaching practices. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 109-132). Washington, DC: MAA.
2. Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D. J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and development in undergraduate mathematics education. In J. Kaput, E. Dubinsky, & A. H. Schoenfeld (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education II (pp. 1-32). Providence, RI: AMS.
3. Czarnocha, B., Dubinsky, E., Prabhu, V., & Vidakovic, D. (1999). One theoretical perspective in undergraduate mathematics education research. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd conference of PME (Vol. 1, pp. 95-110). Haifa, Israel: PME.
4. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-123). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
5. Dubinsky, E. (1994). A theory and practice of learning college mathematics. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 221-243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergrad mathematics education research. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 273-280). Dordrech, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., & Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 109-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Duval, R. (1999). Representation, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXI annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3-26). Columbus, OH: ERIC.
9. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 103-131.
10. Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 94-116.
11. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2008). Contrasts and oblique connections between historical conceptual developments and classroom learning in mathematics. In: L. English (Ed.) and M. Bartolini Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. A. Lesh, B. Sriraman, & D. Tirosh (Ass. Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education, Second edition (pp. 630-659). New York-London: Routledge.
12. Harel, G., & Dubinsky, E. (Eds.). (1992). The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, MAA Notes no. 28. Washington, DC: MAA.
13. Hitt, F. (1998). Difficulties in the articulation of different representations linked to the concept of function. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 123-134.
14. Kabael, T. (2009). The effects of the function machine on students' understanding levels and their image and definition for the concept of function. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 58-64). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
15. Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function concept: A brief survey. The College Mathematics Journal, 20(4), 282-300.
16. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64.
17. Markovits, Z., Eylon, B., & Bruckheimer, M. (1986). Functions today and yesterday. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(2), 18-28.
18. Montiel, M., Wilhelmi, M., Vidakovic, D., & Elstak, I. (2009). Using the onto-semiotic approach to identify and analyze mathematical meaning when transiting between different coordinate systems in a multivariate context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 139-160.
19. Piaget, J., & García, R. (1983). Psicogénesis e historia de la ciencia [Psychogenesis and the history of science]. Mexico City, Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.
20. Radford, L. (1997). On psychology, historical epistemology and the teaching of mathematics: Towards a socio-cultural history of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 26-33.
21. Schwingendorf, K., Hawks, J., & Beineke, J. (1992). Horizontal and vertical growth of the student's conception of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 133-149). Washington, DC: MAA.
22. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
23. Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification-The case of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 59-84). Washington, DC: MAA.
24. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15-39.
25. Stewart, J. (2006). Calculus: Early transcendentals, 6E. Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole.
26. Tall, D. O., & Bakar, M. (1992). Students' mental prototypes for functions and graphs. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 23(1), 39-50.
27. Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 3-19.
28. Yerushalmy, M. (1997). Designing representations: Reasoning about functions of two variables. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 431-466.