Tandem repeated irritation in aged skin induces distinct barrier perturbation and cytokine profile in vivo

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 167, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 787-793

  Angelova Fischer, I ^a   Becker, V ^a   Fischer, T W ^a   Zillikens, D ^a   Wigger Alberti, W ^b   Kezic, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b BioSkin GmbH   (Germany)

^c Amsterdam Public Health research institute   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; INTERLEUKIN 1 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; INTERLEUKIN 1ALPHA; TOLUENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; CYTOKINE RESPONSE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN PERMEABILITY; SKIN TEST; SKIN WATER LOSS; STRATUM CORNEUM; TANDEM REPEATED IRRITATION TEST;

ADULT; AGED; BODY WATER; CYTOKINES; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EPIDERMIS; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERLEUKIN-1ALPHA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECEPTORS, INTERLEUKIN-1 TYPE I; SKIN; SKIN AGING; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; SOLVENTS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TOLUENE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867091738     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11049.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Jenkins G,. Molecular mechanisms of skin ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123: 801-10.
2. Makrantonaki E, Zouboulis CC,. Molekulare Îtiologie der Hautalterung. Hautarzt 2011; 62: 582-7.
3. Elias PM, Ghadially R,. The aged epidermal permeability barrier: basis for functional abnormalities. Clin Geriatr Med 2002; 18: 103-20.
4. Ye J, Garg A, Calhoun C, et al. Alterations in cytokine regulation in aged epidermis: implications for permeability barrier homeostasis and inflammation. IL-1 gene family. Exp Dermatol 2002; 11: 209-16.
5. Ghadially R, Brown BE, Sequeira-Martin SM, et al. The aged epidermal permeability barrier. J Clin Invest 1995; 95: 2281-90.
6. Choi EH, Man MQ, Xu P, et al. Stratum corneum acidification is impaired in moderately aged human and murine skin. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 2847-56.
7. Ghadially R,. Aging and the epidermal permeability barrier: implications for contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 1998; 9: 162-9.
8. Sugar M, Schnetz E, Fartasch M,. Does sodium lauryl sulfate concentration vary with time? Contact Dermat 1999; 40: 146-9.
9. Schnetz E, Diepgen TL, Elsner P, et al. Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation. Contact Dermat 2000; 42: 336-43.
10. Wigger-Alberti W, Krebs A, Elsner P,. Experimental irritant contact dermatitis due to cumulative epicutaneous exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene: single and concurrent application. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 551-6.
11. Wigger-Alberti W, Spoo J, Schliemann-Willers S, et al. The tandem repeated irritation test: a new method to assess prevention of irritant combination to the skin. Acta Derm Venereol 2002; 82: 94-7.
12. Frosch P, Kligman A,. The soap chamber test. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979; 1: 35-41.
13. Piérard GE,. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of skin colour. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998; 10: 1-11.
14. Rogiers V, EEMCO Group. EEMCO Guidance for the Assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001; 14: 117-28.
15. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J,. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermat 1990; 22: 164-78.
16. Berardesca E, EEMCO Group. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: electrical methods. Skin Res Tech 1997; 3: 126-32.
17. Angelova-Fischer I, Mannheimer AC, Hinder A, et al. Distinct barrier integrity phenotypes in filaggrin-related atopic eczema following sequential tape stripping and lipid profiling. Exp Dermatol 2011; 20: 351-6.
18. De Jongh CM, Verberk MM, Withagen CET, et al. Stratum corneum cytokines and skin irritation response to sodium lauryl sulfate. Contact Dermat 2006; 54: 325-33.
19. De Jongh CM, Lutter R, Verberk MM, Kezic S,. Differential cytokine expression in skin after single and repeated irritation by sodium lauryl sulphate. Exp Dermatol 2007; 16: 1032-40.
20. Wigger-Alberti W, Rougier A, Richard A, Elsner P,. Efficacy of protective creams in a modified repeated irritation test (RIT): methodological aspects. Acta Derm Venereol 1998; 78: 270-3.
21. Frosch PJ, Kurte A,. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermat 1994; 31: 161-8.
22. Fluhr JW, Akengin A, Bornkessel A, et al. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153: 125-31.
23. Wigger-Alberti W, Caduff L, Burg G, Elsner P,. Experimentally induced chronic irritant contact dermatitis to evaluate the efficacy of protective creams in vivo. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 590-6.
24. Tupker RA, Willis C, Berardesca E, et al. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. Contact Dermat 1997; 37: 53-69.
25. Aramaki J, Loffler C, Kawana S, et al. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145: 704-8.
26. Fluhr JW, Kuss O, Diepgen T, et al. Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145: 696-703.
27. Fartasch M, Schnetz E, Diepgen TL,. Characterization of detergent-induced barrier alterations-effect of barrier cream on irritation. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 1998; 3: 121-7.
28. Fartasch M,. Ultrastructure of the epidermal barrier after irritation. Microsc Res Tech 1997; 37: 193-9.
29. Von den Driesch P, Fartasch M, Hüner A, Ponec M,. Expression of integrin receptors and ICAM-1 on keratinocytes in vivo and in an in vitro reconstructed epidermis: effect of sodium dodecyl sulphate. Arch Dermatol Res 1995; 287: 249-53.
30. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI,. Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br J Dermatol 1990; 123: 607-13.
31. Schwindt DA, Wilhelm KP, Miller DL, Maibach HI,. Cumulative irritation in older and younger skin: a comparison. Acta Derm Venereol 1998; 78: 279-83.
32. Elsner P, Wilhelm D, Maibach HI,. Sodium lauryl sulphate-induced irritant contact dermatitis in vulvar and forearm skin of premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 648-52.
33. Coenraads PJ, Bleumink E, Nater JP,. Susceptibility to primary irritants: age dependence and relation to contact allergic reactions. Contact Dermat 1975; 1: 377-81.
34. Patil S, Maibach HI,. Effect of age and sex on the elicitation of irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermat 1994; 30: 257-64.
35. Kartono F, Maibach HI,. Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: an overview of tandem irritation studies. Contact Dermat 2006; 54: 303-12.
36. Schliemann-Willers S, Fuchs S, Kleesz P, et al. Fruit acids do not enhance sodium lauryl sulphate-induced cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in vivo. Acta Derm Venereol 2005; 85: 206-10.
37. Fluhr JW, Kelterer D, Fuchs S, et al. Additive impairment of the barrier function and irritation by biogenic amines and sodium lauryl sulphate: a controlled in vivo tandem irritation study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2005; 18: 88-97.
38. Fluhr JW, Bankova L, Fuchs S, et al. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151: 1039-48.
39. Kappes UP, Göritz N, Wigger-Alberti W, et al. Tandem application of sodium lauryl sulfate and n-propanol does not lead to enhancement of cumulative skin irritation. Acta Derm Venereol 2001; 81: 403-5.
40. Ale SI, Laugier JK, Maibach HI,. Differential irritant skin responses to topical retinoic acid and sodium lauryl sulphate: alone and in crossover design. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134: 424-30.
41. Perkins MA, Osterhues MA, Farage MA, Robinson MK,. A noninvasive method to assess skin irritation and compromised skin conditions using simple tape adsorption of molecular markers of inflammation. Skin Res Tech 2001; 7: 227-37.
42. De Jongh CM, Verberk MM, Spiekstra SW, et al. Cytokines at different stratum corneum levels in normal and sodium lauryl sulphate-irritated skin. Skin Res Tech 2007; 13: 390-8.
43. Hirao T, Aoki H, Yoshida T, et al. Elevation of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the stratum corneum of sun-exposed and ultraviolet-B irritated human skin. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106: 1102-7.
44. Terui T, Hirao T, Sato Y, et al. An increased ratio of interleukin-receptor antagonist to interleukin-1α in inflammatory skin diseases. Exp Dermatol 1998; 7: 327-34.