The 'Double Movements' of Neighbourhood Change: Gentrification and Public Policy in Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg

Urban Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 3045-3062

  Bernt, Matthias ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON SOCIETY AND SPACE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENTRIFICATION; MARKET CONDITIONS; NEIGHBORHOOD; POLICY APPROACH; POLITICAL PROCESS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN SOCIETY;

BERLIN; GERMANY; HARLEM; NEW YORK [NEW YORK (STT)]; NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84867087660     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012437746     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bernt M.Rübergeklappt: Die 'Behutsame Stadterneuerung' im Berlin der 1990er Jahre. Berlin: Schelzky & Jeep; 2003:.
2. Bernt M.,Holm A.Gentrification in a Global Perspective: The New Urban Colonialism. Atkinson R.Bridge G., ed. Milton Park: Routledge; 2005:106-120.
3. Bernt M.,Holm A.Is it, or is it not? The conceptualisation of gentrification and displacement and its political implications: the case of Prenzlauer Berg.City. 2009;13 (2/3): 312-324.
4. Bodenschatz H.Platz frei für das neue Berlin! Geschichte der Stadterneuerung in der 'größten Mietskasernenstadt der Welt' seit 1871. Berlin: Transit; 1987:.
5. City of New York, City Planning Commission (2008) Final environmental impact statement for 125th Street corridor rezoning and related actions (http://nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/env_review/125th/foreword_feis.pdf).
6. Clark K. B.Dark Ghetto. Hannover, NH: Wesley University Press; 1965:.
7. Closing the door 2007: the shape of subsidized housing loss in New York City. New York City:; 2007:.
8. Dieser H.Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland: Soziale und Räumliche Tendenzen. Häußermann H.Neef R., ed. Berlin: Leske & Budrich; 1996:107-128.
9. DiFilippis J.,Saegert S.The Community Development Reader. New York: Routledge; 2007:.
10. Freeman L.There Goes the 'Hood: Views of Gentrification from the Ground Up. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 2006:.
11. Housing policy in New York City: a brief history. New York University; 2001:.
12. Hackworth J.Post recession gentrification in New York City.Urban Affairs Review. 2002;37:707-725.
13. Hackworth J.,Smith N.Final report: the diffusion of post-recession gentrification. NSF Fastlane; 2000:.
14. Hackworth J.,Smith N.The changing state of gentrification.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 2001;22:464-477.
15. Hartman C.Land Reform American Style. Geisler C.Popper F., ed. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld; 1984:302-318.
16. Harvey D.Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution.Regional Studies. 1974;8:239-255.
17. Häußermann H.,Holm A.,Zunzer D.Stadterneuerung in der Berliner Republik. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag; 2002:.
18. Holm A.Urban renewal and the end of social housing. the roll out of neoliberalism in East Berlin's Prenzlauer Berg.Social Justice. 2006a;33 (3): 114-128.
19. Holm A.Die Restrukturierung des Raumes: Machtverhältnisse in der Stadterneuerung der 90er Jahre in Ostberlin. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag; 2006b:.
20. Hyra D.The New Urban Renewal: The Economic Transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2008:.
21. Lees L.,Ley D.Introduction: gentrification and public policy.Urban Studies. 2008;45 (12): 2379-2384.
22. Lees L.,Slater T.,Wyly E.Gentrification. New York: Routledge; 2008:.
23. Ley D.,Dobson C.Are there limits to gentrification? The context of impeded gentrification in Vancouver.Urban Studies. 2008;45 (12): 2471-2498.
24. Listokin D.,Wyly E. K.,Keating L.,Rengert K. M., et alMaking new mortgage markets. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation; 2000:.
25. Loopmans M.Relevance, gentrification and the development of a new hegemony on urban politics in Antwerp, Belgium.Urban Studies. 2008;45 (12): 2499-2520.
26. Marcuse P.Gentrification of the City. Smith N.Williams P., ed. London: Unwin Hyman; 1986:153-177.
27. McClure K.The low-income housing tax credit as an aid to housing finance: how well has it worked?.Housing Policy Debate. 2000;11 (1): 91-114.
28. McCord C.,Freeman H. P.Excess mortality in Harlem.New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;322:173-177.
29. Mollenkopf J.A Phoenix in the Ashes: The Rise and Fall of the Koch Coalition in New York City Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1992:.
30. New York City Department of City Planning (2008) 125th Street corridor and related actions. Environmental impact statement.
31. Polanyi K.The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1944/1957:.
32. Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies. Porter L.Shaw K., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:.
33. Reimann B.Städtische Wohnquartiere. Opladen: Leske & Budrich; 2000:.
34. Ryzin G. G. van,Genn A.Neighborhood change and the city of New York's ten-year housing plan.Housing Policy Debate. 1999;10 (4): 799-838.
35. Schill M. H.,Ellen I. G.,Schwartz A. E.,Voicu I.Revitalizing inner-city neighborhoods: New York City's ten-year plan.Housing Policy Debate. 2002;13 (3): 529-566.
36. Bericht des Senators für Bau- und Wohnungswesen über die Vorbereitung und Durchführung der Stadterneuerung. Berlin: Leitsätze zur Stadterneuerung in Berlin; 1993:.
37. Shaw K.Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. Atkinson R.Bridge G., ed. London: Routledge; 2005:168-184.
38. Shaw K.Commentary: is there hope for policy?.Urban Studies. 2008;45 (12): 2637-2642.
39. Shaw K.Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies. Porter L.Shaw K., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:253-260.
40. Slater T.North American gentrifcation? Revanchist and emancipatory perspectives explored.Environment and Planning A. 2004;36:1141-1150.
41. Slater T.The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2006;30 (4): 737-757.
42. Smith N.Towards a theory of gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital, not people.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1979;45 (4): 538-548.
43. Smith N.The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge; 1996:.
44. Smith N.New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy.Antipode. 2002;34 (3): 427-450.
45. From Redlining to Reinvestment. Squires G. D., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1992:.
46. Stoecker R.The CDC model of urban redevelopment: a critique and an alternative.Journal of Urban Affairs. 1997;19 (1): 1-22.
47. Uitermark J.,Duyvendak J. W.,Kleinhans R.Gentrification as a governmental strategy: social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam.Environment and Planning A. 2007;39:125-141.
48. US Census Bureau (1991-2008) New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey (http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/nychvs/nychvs.html).
49. Vitullo-MartinJ. (2005) Doing it right: affordable homeownership in Harlem. Monthly newsletter, Center for Rethinking Development, Manhattan Institute, May (www.manhattan-institute.org/email/crd_newsletter05-05.html).
50. Weesep J. van.Gentrification as a research frontier.Progress in Human Geography. 1994;18:74-83.
51. Wyly E.,Hammel D.Islands of decay in seas of renewal: housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification.Housing Policy Debate. 1999;10 (4): 711-771.
52. Wyly E.,Hammel D.Commentary: urban policy frontiers.Urban Studies. 2008;45 (12): 2643-2648.
53. Wyly E.,Moos M.,Foxcroft H.,Kabahizi E.Subprime mortgage segmentation in the American urban system.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. 2008;99 (1): 3-23.