Global precedence and response activation: Evidence from LRPs

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 289-310

  Miller, Jeff ^a   Navon, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; EVOKED RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0036363678     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000280     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Amirkhiabani, G., & Lovegrove, W.J. (1996). Role of eccentricity and size in the global precedence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1434-1447.
2. Coles, M.G.H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269.
3. Coles, M.G.H., Gehring, W.J., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Response activation and verification: A psychophysiological analysis. In G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior, 2 (pp. 779-792). Amsterdam: North Holland.
4. Coles, M.G.H., & Gratton, G. (1986). Cognitive psychophysiology and the study of states and processes. In G.R.J. Hockey, A.W.K. Gaillard, & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and human information processing (pp. 409-424). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
5. Coles, M.G.H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T.R., Eriksen, C.W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.
6. Cooke, E.W., III (1981). FWTGEN - An interactive FORTRAN II/IV program for calculating weights for a nonrecursive digital filter. Psychophysiology, 18, 489-490.
7. Cooke, E.W., III, & Miller, G.A. (1992). Digital filtering: Background and tutorial for psychophysiologists. Psychophysiology, 29, 350-367.
8. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1988). The use of partial information in response processing: A psychophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
9. Donders, F.C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes (W. Koster, Trans.). In W.G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412-431). Amsterdam: North Holland. (Original work published 1868.)
10. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
11. Efron, B. (1981). Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other methods. Biometrika, 68, 589-599.
12. Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 146-156.
13. Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
14. Eriksen, B.A., & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
15. Eriksen, C.W., Coles, M.G.H., Morris, L.R., & O'Hara, W.P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165-168.
16. Eriksen, C.W., & Schultz, D.W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
17. Fink, G.R., Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C., Frith, C.D., Frackowiak, R.S.J., & Dolan, R.J. (1997). Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain, 120, 1779-1791.
18. Fournier, L.R., Scheffers, M.K., Coles, M.G.H., Adamson, A., & Abad, E.V. (2000). When complexity helps: An electrophysiological analysis of multiple feature benefits in object perception. Acta Psychologica, 104, 119-142.
19. Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C.W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
20. Grice, G.R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J.M. (1983). Forest before trees? It depends on where you look. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 121-128.
21. Hackley, S.A., & Miller, J.O. (1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 32, 230-241.
22. Heinze, H.J., & Münte, T.F. (1993). Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: Dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing. Neuropsychologia, 31, 841-852.
23. Huynh, H. (1978). Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika, 43, 161-175.
24. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
25. Kornblum, S., Stevens, G.T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 688-714.
26. Kotchoubey, B., Wascher, E., & Verleger, R. (1997). Shifting attention between global features and small details: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 46, 25-50.
27. LaGasse, L.L. (1993). Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 89-105.
28. Lamb, M.R., & Robertson, L.C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information? Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 254-258.
29. Lamb, M.R., Yund, E.W., & Pond, H.M. (1999). Is attentional selection to different levels of hierarchical structure based on spatial frequency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 88-94.
30. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
31. Leuthold, H. (1994). Analysis of spatial stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect by means of overt behavioral and electrophysiological measures: Covert response activation as a common basis? PhD thesis, University of Konstanz, Germany.
32. Logan, G.D. (1981). Attention, automaticity, and the ability to stop a speeded choice response. In J.B. Long & A.D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention andperformance IX (pp. 205-222). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. Low, K.A., & Miller, J.O. (1999). The usefulness of partial information: Effects of Go probability in the choice/Nogo task. Psychophysiology, 36, 288-297.
34. Lu, C.H., & Proctor, R.W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
35. Luna, D., Merino, J.M., & Marcos-Ruiz, R. (1990). Processing dominance of global and local information in visual patterns. Acta Psychologica, 73, 131-143.
36. Masaki, H., Takasawa, N., & Yamazaki, K. (2000). An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology, 37, 464-472.
37. McClelland, J.L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: A framework for analyzing processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
38. Meyer, D.E., Osman, A.M., Irwin, D.E., & Yantis, S. (1988). Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology, 26, 3-67.
39. Miller, J.O. (1982a). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 273-296.
40. Miller, J.O. (1982b). Effects of noise letters on decisions: Discrete or continuous flow of information? Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 227-236.
41. Miller, J.O. (1988). Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: Theoretical distinctions and empirical results. Acta Psychologica, 67, 191-257.
42. Miller, J.O., & Hackley, S.A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209.
43. Miller, J.O., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99-115.
44. Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. (1977). Data analysis and regression. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
45. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
46. Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 1-32.
47. Navon, D., & Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 955-965.
48. Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
49. Osman, A.M., Bashore, T.R., Coles, M.G.H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D.E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
50. Osman, A.M., & Moore, C.M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292-1312.
51. Pomerantz, J.R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 516-540.
52. Ridderinkhof, K.R., & van der Molen, M.W. (1995). When global information and local information collide: A brain potential analysis of the locus of interference effects. Biological Psychology, 41, 29-53.
53. Simon, J.R. (1968). Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 344-346.
54. Smid, H.G.O.M., Böcker, K.B.E., van Touw, D.A., Mulder, G., & Brunia, C.H.M. (1996). A psychophysiological investigation of the selection and the use of partial stimulus information in response choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 3-24.
55. Smid, H.G.O.M., & Heinze, H.J. (1997). An electrophysiological study of the selection of the color and shape of alphanumeric characters in response choice. Biological Psychology, 44, 161-185.
56. Smid, H.G.O.M., Lamain, W., Hogeboom, M.M, Mulder, G., & Mulder, LJ.M. (1991). Psychophysiological evidence for continuous information transmission between visual search and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 696-714.
57. Smid, H.G.O.M., & Mulder, G. (1995). The availability versus the use of partial information: Multiple levels of selective processing between perception and action. Acta Psychologica, 90, 145-162.
58. Smid, H.G.O.M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1987). The continuous flow model revisited: Perceptual and motor aspects. In R.E. Johnson, Jr., J.W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current trends in event-related potential research. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology (Supp. 40, pp. 270-278). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
59. Smid, H.G.O.M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169-201.
60. Smid, H.G.O.M., Mulder, G., Mulder, L.J.M., & Brands, G.J. (1992). A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1101-1119.
61. Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Hermanutz, M. (1993). Covert effects of alcohol revealed by event related potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 127-135.
62. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
63. Van Dellen, H.J., Brookhuis, K.A., Mulder, G., Okita, T., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1985). Evoked potential correlates of practice in a visual search task. In D. Papakostopoulos, S. Butler, & I. Martin (Eds.), Clinical and experimental neuropsychophysiology (pp. 132-155). Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm.