Domain of concern of occupational therapy: Relevance to pediatric practice

Frames of Reference for Pediatric Occupational Therapy: Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 31-49

  Luebben, Aimee J ^a   Hinojosa, Jim ^b   Kramer, Paula ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867080314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (1979). Occupational Therapy Output Reporting System and Uniform Terminology System for Reporting Occupational Therapy Services. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
2. American Occupational Therapy Association. (1989). Uniform terminology for occupational therapy-second edition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 808-814.
3. American Occupational Therapy Association. (1994a). Application of uniform terminology to practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 1055-1059.
4. American Occupational Therapy Association. (1994b). Uniform terminology for occupational therapy-third edition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 1047-1054.
5. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 609-639.
6. Butts, D. S., & Nelson, D. L. (2007). Agreement between the occupational therapy practice framework classifications and occupational therapists classifications. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 512-518.
7. Christiansen, C., Clark, F., Kielhofner, G., Rogers, J., & Nelson, D. (1995). Position paper: Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 1015-1018.
8. Cynkin, S., & Robinson, A. M. (1990). Occupational Therapy and Activities Health: Towards Health Through Activities. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
9. Gutman, S. H., Mortera, M. H., Hinojosa, J., & Kramer, P. (2007). Revision of the occupational therapy practice framework. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 119-126.
10. Hinojosa, J., & Kramer, P. (1997). Statement: Fundamental concepts of occupational therapy: Occupation, purposeful activity, and function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 864-866.
11. Hopkins, H. L., & Tiffany, E. G. (1988). Occupational therapy-a problem solving process. In H. L. Hopkins, & H. D. Smith (Eds). Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy (7th ed., pp. 102-111). Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott Co.
12. Levine, R. E. (1984). The cultural aspects of home care delivery. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 734-738.
13. Mosey, A. C. (1986). Psychosocial Component of Occupational Therapy. New York: Raven Press.
14. Nelson, D. L. (2006). Critiquing the logic of the Domain section of the occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 511-523.
15. Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., & Brotherson, M. J. (1986). Family life cycle: theoretical and empirical implications and future directions for families with mentally retarded members. In J. J. Gallagher, & P. M. Vietze (Eds). Families of Handicapped Persons (pp. 45-65). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
16. World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO.
17. World Health Organization. (2007). History of the Development of the ICD. Retrieved July 19, 2007 from http://www.who.int/entity/classifications/icd/en/HistoryOfICD.pdf.